Organizational Structure and System Acquisition Method of Coca Cola
Verified
Added on 2023/06/12
|16
|3618
|274
AI Summary
This report provides a literature review on the organizational structure, operational problems, system acquisition method, and accounting software of Coca Cola. It also identifies the market leaders and their competitive advantages.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: MPA MPA Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1MPA Table of Content Introduction of the organization.................................................................................................2 Organizational Structure........................................................................................................2 Literature Review.......................................................................................................................3 Part-1..........................................................................................................................................3 Current organizational structure.............................................................................................3 Operational Problems caused by the structure.......................................................................4 System acquisition method....................................................................................................5 Describing and drawing the system flowchart of sales procedures for Coca Cola................6 Identifying any control problems in the system and sorts of fraud possible in the system....7 Part 2:.........................................................................................................................................7 Development and adoption of the accounting software.........................................................7 Current market size................................................................................................................9 Identifying the leaders in the market size and what provides them the competitive advantages ..................................................................................................................................................10 Identifying the current gaps or challenges encountered by the users or customer of accounting software package......................................................................................................................11 Recommendation..................................................................................................................11 Conclusion................................................................................................................................12 References................................................................................................................................13
2MPA Introduction of the organization This report provides a detailed literature review revolving around the organizational structure, its impact on the operation and system acquisition method. The purpose of the report is to review how organizational structure and operational methods can influence the overall performance of the business.In order to conduct the review with real-world evidences,thereportincludeCocaCola,whichissoftdrinkandbeverageitems manufacturer. The firm was established in 1886 but now has become a global leader in non- alcoholicbeverageindustry.CocaColaemployed92,800employeesin200nations. However, the current operational scenario indicate that net revenue of Coca Cola has declined by 20% for the first quarter as well as 15% for the full year (coca-colaglobal.com). Nonetheless, the recent data also indicates that Coca Cola delivered an increasing fourth quarter operating results. It is particularly identified that the organization delivered broad- based organic revenue growth while the overall revenue may continue to be impacted largely due to the ongoing refreshing initiatives. The following paragraph defines the organizational structure of Coca Cola. Organizational Structure It has been identified that Coca Cola Company presently employs approximately 94,800 employees.Asper thegeneral organizationalstructure gainedfrom company’ website, there are almost more than five different hierarchical level at the corporate level. The head of the Canadian division report to the president as well as COO of the North America Group. The president reports to the CFO, who further reports to the general level. Because of its tall structure, Coca Cola has experienced communication issues. One of the major problem found through a survey conducted by Irefinet al. (pp. 33-41), is the people and the organization lacked a clear goals. In this context, Crifoet al. (pp. 405-416)
3MPA commented that tall hierarchies also remains as motivation problem and due to which the organization is seeking to get employees more engaged. Figure 1: Organizational Structure (Source: Sadraouiet al.pp53-76) Literature Review Part-1 Current organizational structure A brief of the organizational structure has been provided above in the introductory section and it is found that organization observes a major communication problems such as lack of understanding about the gaols between the people and the organization. It is also found that due to tall hierarchies, the organization faces motivational issues. Moodie, Rob,et
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4MPA al.(pp. 670-679) conducted analytical report and found that increased usefulness of company’s intranet may largely increase the communication in the each level of Coca Cola. This also allows the upper management to appropriately communicate to the front line employees of the organization. In addition to this, organization realizes that a divisional structure provides the company with the opportunity to respond to the changes in its uncertain environment but the firm allows divisional structure to maintain a range of stability. On the other side, Fletcheret al.(pp. 967-974) mentionedthat multidivisionalstructureremainsbeneficialfor the company for a multiple reasons. Hence, Khanet al.(p.5)also mentioned that the division based on the geographic regions permits particular range of elements of organization’s operation to be implemented to the individual market. For instance, one advertising campaign mightnotbeperfectforanothermarket;thereby,thedecisionregardingparticular advertisement are usually made closer to the individual markets. Thereby, it is worth mentioning that divisional manager of the organization finds it easy to deal with regular operation due to multi-divisional structure while the corporate managers have the scope for long-term planning. Operational Problems caused by the structure Alexanderetal.(pp.26)mentionedthattherearesomeissuesassociatedwiththe organisational structure; for example, if the organization generates a divisional competition, the coordination may decrease as each division may want to have an advantage over every entity. On the other side, Gaba, Vibha, and John Joseph (pp.1102-1119) also added that communication may exist as the information become distorted when it is supposed to travel throughoutthetallhierarchies.Therefore,theauthorhasalsomentionedthata multidivisional matrix structure could be effective for the Coca Cola Company.
5MPA Furthermore, it is estimated that due to tall organizational structure, the employees at each level may find it difficult to communicate with both upper and lower level of management. Moreover, as the organization is performing in an internal environment, the approval of managerial decisions take a lot of time. For example, if a branch in Asian market needs to implement an action of digital media implementation, it has to wait for the approval of the decision for the executives and president to respond.Consequently, the overall operational performance may delay. On the contrary, Wilden, Ralf,et al.(72-96) performed a research and found that the organization with vast operation and tall structure may find it difficult to stand the purpose of using technology because, for example, implementing custom software or any accounting software may high guidance and monitoring. The employees must have proper knowledge about the software and its use and without training and guidance from the management, the employees may not be able to use it properly. However, providing required guidance to all managerial levels employees require time and strategic planning and this entire process could slow the operation due to tall dimensional structure. System acquisition method The effective system acquisition method that Coca Cola uses is “Enterprise Resource Planning”, which works as the corporate or enterprise—wide information system which is highly complex but helps to derive information from the entire organization and even from the outside of the firm. In addition, Tripodi, and Joe (p.9) conducted research on Coca Cola and found that ERP system helps to automate the process from all functions and provides a modular information system. For example, the iconic cans of sugar water is the presentation ofCocaCola’sexecutivesbasedontheinitiativeofglobalSAPERPinitiativethe organization has embedded with operation. Furthermore, it is also identified that Coca Cola tends to standardize on the general IT backbone (SAP’s ERP in 2009) but Sheth, Jagdish
6MPA (p166-182) mentioned that there is a much more to go because ERP implementation at all levelofoperationsrequirecarefulattention,knowledgemanagementintheinternal environment, which is difficult under tall organizational structure. Describing and drawing the system flowchart of sales procedures for Coca Cola The following system flowchart indicates that how Coca Cola process the sales of its products items. The diagram particularly indicates that how both traditional and ERP marketing process have been used to guide and lead the overall sales. Figure 2: Sales flow chart of Coca Cola Twoway Communication Sales distribution process Sales through Traditional Marketing ERP marketing Sales through Cloud marketing platform Distributors Products to Target Audience
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7MPA (Source: Made by Student) The organization uses a two way communication which party involves in the selling process will inform or update the parties sitting at the top or at the bottom.On the other side, the organization also uses the ERP system to process the sales, which certainly increases the speed of processing the sales. Likewise, the cloud platform works as the storage device which stores all information of sales and updates provided by the distributor and selling channels authority. According to (), the most effective part of sales system of Coca Cola is it uses both traditional and ERP based selling practices. However, Culnanet al.(p.12) argued that two way communication in the selling process is not effective because the distance between involved entities are large; thereby, the communication gets delayed in the middle. Identifying any control problems in the system and sorts of fraud possible in the system The sale procedures system of Coca Cola certainly has issues related to control of the operation due to multiple reasons. Firstly, although the ERP is implemented in selling but the people in the organization are not accustomed to the system and the major flow of operation is usually done through the traditional channels of selling while the organizations invested a large amount on the ERP implementation to speed up the selling process.In this context, Adeyemi, and Salami (p. 135-142) commented that ERP plays a great role in maintaining and processing the online selling but improper use and lack of attention to ERP with respect to selling at Coca Cola causes delay in selling process. Moreover, Granlund and Markus (pp. 3- 19) also mentioned that due to two way communication in the selling system, not always the information each the respective entity on time.
8MPA Part 2: Development and adoption of the accounting software As put forward by Jadhavet al.(pp. 1394-1407), accounting software is probably the first application to come up in organization with the entry of software and hardware. The author has also mentioned that the reason is the money as the first concern when the organization think of the control. Wagneret al.(pp. 181-197) conducted a research and found that there are several type of accounting software such as day care accounting software, pay roll accounting software –oracle financial but most of the organization prefers payroll accounting software. Nonetheless, the scholars have mentioned that it is yet difficult for the marketers to understand which particular accounting software fits for their environment. As put forward by Jadhav (p.1399), accounting software remains mandatory for organizations of all size as well as in any sector. Such software provides a seriesof benefits to the organization such as faster accounting, decreased cost and error free-taxation. To be more specific, accounting software could offer a range of relevant features and organizations usually choose a solution that include an attractive interface, which becomes easy to use. For example, the organization Delluses SaaS, SAP to process their employee payroll and control the distribution network. Ontheotherside,thelargesoftwaremanufacturerMicrosoftusesFinancialForce Accounting software and NetSuit ERP to control and manage its overall operation. Hence, Granlund and Markus (p.17) mentioned that as the technology is rapidly developing due to force of dynamic market environment, the organizations are heading towards the adoption of technology in the form of an application software such as the accounting one. Understanding this need of application software in accounting and in other areas of operation, Coca Cola implements two different information system (IS) which is further working under one more IS- CCBL
9MPA Figure 3: Accounting software (Source: Granlund and Markus, p.17) Current market size According to the recent statistics provided in the annual report, Coca Cola holds a leading position in the soft drink and beverage industry. Sadraouiet al.(pp. 53-76) particularly, mentioned that during the period 2000 to 2017, the organization has increased earnings per share from $0.74 to $2.00, which remains equivalent to a CAGR of 6.9%. The organization has compounded EPS at a rate of 10.2% which is an increasing rate of earning growth. Conversely, Khanet al.(pp.122) mentioned that even though the earnings growth is high, in the field of juice, nectars and still drink, the share of Coca Cola’s largest fruit-based Mazza decreased 223 basis points to 34.4%. Hence, Gaba, Vibha, and John Joseph (pp. 1102- 1119) argued that Pepsi’s Slice dropped to 4.3 basis points to 9.6% during the period June to September in 2017.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10MPA Identifying the leaders in the market size and what provides them the competitive advantages It has been identified that even though the share of Coca Cola has declined to a certain range but the organization is still leading the market with 48.6% of market share, while PepsiCo holds 20.5% and 30.9% is acquired by other brands in the industry such as Nestle, Starbucks Corp, Diageo and others (Ogolaet al. pp. 2234). Figure: Market Share and the leaders in the beverage industry (Source:Ogolaet al. pp. 2234) A conducted a research and found that presently in the Asian market such as India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan Coca Cola is losing market share to the regional rivals such as Parle, Dabur and ITC because the global soft drink giants launched more fruit-based and more healthier products to minimize their reliance and sugary sodas. However, the market
11MPA leaderssuchasPepsiCohavestrengthenedtheirmarketpositionandPepsiCogains competitive advantage by applying cost leadership strategy, in which, to compete against Coca Cola products, PepsiCo sets low price for the product. This happens because the firm minimize the operation cost. On the other side, PepsiCo uses broad differentiation as their second generic competitive strategy. This generic strategy helps the firm to gain competitive advantages by attracting customers to find the unique features. For example, Lays and potato chips of PepsiCo are sold and marketed as the healthiest snack item due to low of amount of saturated fat content.Hence, Pepsi’s strategic objective for the broad differentiation generic strategy is to innovate products to identify the concern about the health effects. Identifying the current gaps or challenges encountered by the users or customer of accounting software package As argued by Wagneret al. (pp. 181-197) accounting issues are natural amongst against those who are currently using the accounting software. Granlund and Markus (pp.15) mentioned that non user-friendliness is probably the major problem. Lack of security:The user of accounting software tend to face the security threats of their information become they are usually accessible by foreign entities. Although, the firewalls are considered to have the capacity to resolve this problem. Weak reporting service:It is identified that some accounting software solutions remain powerless in guiding users who want to get their business data out. The users are irritated with the fact that it is easy to put information in yet impossible to receive them later. Recommendation It is identified that most of the users when using accounting software tend to make the common mistakes such as not baking up the financial record storage. The organizations or its employees can resolve these issues by following the instruction of using the software. The
12MPA organization needs to provide proper training and development program with respect to the use of accounting software; this would help them to avoid the common mistakes in the software. However, the issues of security can be avoided by availing the updated version of the software. Conclusion This report provides a detailed literature review of the organizational structure and its impact on the operation, employees and other parties. From the review, it has been identified that due to tall and dimensional organization structure, the organization Coca Cola observed a significant communication issue which further delaying the decision-making process of the organisation. In addition, the review of literature also helps to find out that due to lack of training and development programs, the organisational members often find it difficult to use accounting software.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
13MPA References "Coca-Cola Journey | Refreshing India One Story At A Time".The Coca-Cola Company, 2018, https://www.coca-colaglobal.com/. Accessed 24 Apr 2018. Adeyemi, S. L., and A. O. Salami. "Inventory management: A tool of optimizing resources in a manufacturing industry a case study of coca-cola bottling company, Ilorin Plant."Journal of social Sciences23.2 (2010): 135-142. Alexander, Eleanore, Derek Yach, and George A. Mensah. "Major multinational food and beveragecompaniesandinformalsectorcontributionstoglobalfoodconsumption: implications for nutrition policy."Globalization and health7.1 (2011): 26. Crifo, Patricia, Marc-Arthur Diaye, and Sanja Pekovic. "CSR related management practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis of the quantity–quality trade-off on French data."International Journal of Production Economics171 (2016): 405-416. Culnan, Mary J., Patrick J. McHugh, and Jesus I. Zubillaga. "How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value."MIS Quarterly Executive9.4 (2010). Fletcher, Jason M., David E. Frisvold, and Nathan Tefft. "The effects of soft drink taxes on childandadolescentconsumptionandweightoutcomes."JournalofPublic Economics94.11-12 (2010): 967-974. Gaba, Vibha, and John Joseph. "Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms."Organization Science24.4 (2013): 1102-1119. Granlund, Markus. "Extending AIS research to management accounting and control issues: A research note."International Journal of Accounting Information Systems12.1 (2011): 3-19.
14MPA Irefin,Peace,andMohammedAliMechanic."Effectofemployeecommitmenton organizational performance in Coca Cola Nigeria Limited Maiduguri, Borno state."Journal of Humanities and Social Science(2014): 33-41. Jadhav, Anil S., and Rajendra M. Sonar. "Framework for evaluation and selection of the software packages: A hybrid knowledge based system approach."Journal of Systems and Software84.8 (2011): 1394-1407. Khan, Tamkeen, Lisa M. Powell, and Roy Wada. "Fast food consumption and food prices: evidence from panel data on 5th and 8th grade children."Journal of obesity2012 (2012). Moodie, Rob, et al. "Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries."The Lancet381.9867 (2013): 670- 679. Ogola, Fredrick Onyango, and Thomas Dreer. "Market share as an indicator for corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending: The study of Coca Cola's market."African Journal of Business Management6.6 (2012): 2234. Sadraoui, Tarek, Ayadi Afef, and Jallouli Fayza. "Six Sigma: a new practice for reducing water consumption within Coca Cola industry."International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage6.1-2 (2010): 53-76. Sheth,JagdishN."Impactofemergingmarketsonmarketing:Rethinkingexisting perspectives and practices."Journal of Marketing75.4 (2011): 166-182. Tripodi,Joe."Cocacolamarketingshiftsfromimpressionstoexpressions."Harvard Business Review. Retrieved, August(2013).
15MPA Wagner, Erica L., Jodie Moll, and Sue Newell. "Accounting logics, reconfiguration of ERP systemsandtheemergenceofnewaccountingpractices:Asociomaterial perspective."Management Accounting Research22.3 (2011): 181-197. Wilden,Ralf,etal."Dynamiccapabilitiesandperformance:strategy,structureand environment."Long Range Planning46.1-2 (2013): 72-96.