This essay discusses the Australian legal system, court agreements, jurisdiction, and governing laws in commercial conflict of laws. It covers topics such as the convention for choice of court agreements, choice of law, and jurisdiction clause.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Commercial Conflict of Laws Research Essay
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Introduction The commercial law is mentioned as business and corporate law. This law focus on the laws which governs sales, trade, merchandise and commerce, and it also participate in activities which includes businesses and individuals. The commercial law is a division of civil and commercial law which surrounds a many topics mainly as taxation law, finance and banking law, trade and practices and consumer law. The Australian commercial law obtain its power from numerous founts.The Corporation Act 2001set forth the law which preside over how companies are set up, and how they will operate, internally and their relationship with other businesses. This statute is regulate by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission. Commercial law plays essential role in modern era most ofbusinesses and the individuals operate in what can be seen as disputative time. The commercial law protects businesses, which examines international commercial law, and provides the detailed introduction to World Trade Organization and to agreement central to trade business countries. Many of these categories comes within this law, the aspect of this law pertaining to the financial markets. This will also be to regulate corporate contracts, hiring practices and sales of consumer goods. This draft also includes the Australian Legal System, Court Agreements and Jurisdiction. Main Body The Australian Legal System is distinctive, this is a combination of English common law and U.S. this framework is developed from the federal nature of Australia. the legal system of this country which consists of the body of law, most of the countries which were the colony of British, they have legal system which have been handed down to them, in most of the cases the countries have get independence from them. The laws have been made and specifically serves need of the society. The constitution of Australia defined the legal system of Australia. the federal nature of government governs in Australia, the states and the territory of government have better control over the laws which exists in the judicial system. There is a bicameral parliament in each state and territory. The system of courts in each of the territory and state is in the hands of many of laws of the jurisdiction, and most of them are from the common law of England and which is inherited by Australia from Britain when they were their colony.
There is a convention for choice of court agreements which have been set out for how the jurisdiction being treated by the court in private contract, the parties have discretion that where they wants to resolve the disputes. This convention will apply to civil and commercial laws and this have exclusion and qualification. The objective of this convention is to support. This convention only applies to the exclusive choice of the agreements made by the court, these agreements have to be presumed and have to be exclusive until the parties provide this otherwise. The convention of the Hague Principles will reflect the existing situation, where the choice of agreements of court will generally given effect from the relevant courts, this convention also imposes some obligation on courts as to be designated in this jurisdiction and have to be obliged to perform jurisdiction, the courts are obliged to decline the jurisdiction, the agreements in Australia for the treatment of exclusive choice of court is largely governed from common law. The enforceability of this agreement is general. The new civil law act will implement this convention.The committee stated that Singapore is the only asian party to the treaty and taken into consideration the AGD's proof that Asia did not get the required concern for the purpose of representation at the Hague conference. Giving much importance to the relationship among Australian and Asian commercial activities, the committee appreciates the efforts of Australia of pushing the Asian countries in the participating at the above mentioned conference.The NIA stated that the treaty will ascertain that the adjudicating authority must exercise its control according to the agreements formulated between the parties. This will create a balance and removes uncertainty between the proceedings going hand in hand in various domains. The further application of the treaty will ensure that more number of foreign verdicts will be able to get acknowledgement and imposition in Australia. It is believed by NIA that this will definitely increase the scope of business litigation across the border as the substitute to arbitration which will ensure much more competitiveness and reduced costs the governing law is to be determined as the law which can be applied to an agreement and the legal dispute arises from it. It also provides about the set of legal principle which will be applied to determine the rights and obligation of the parties. We have the choice of law which can clause any of the international contracts. Generally the courts will respect the parties, this clause may not be effective. The courts in many circumstances applies their own procedural and related rules to determine the dispute. The courts will have the choice of law and this can be conferred with the terms and nature of the contract and the general circumstances. This will be governed by law
if there is no express and implied choice of law. The jurisdiction clause is there to select the court which will interfere a dispute arises with any agreement between the parties. It will also determine the court which adjudicate dispute and the chosen law will be applied to the selected jurisdiction. The choice of jurisdiction have to be there, when there is a contract or it may have a foreign element. If the jurisdiction clause is being omitted then the parties may suffer the disadvantages. The parties in a civil proceeding have the exclusive jurisdiction to the court, that only means the said court have the power to adjudicate the case until there is any strong case is against it . the forum non-conveniens have to be refer there.