The assignment discusses the usage of social theory in healthcare research, highlighting strengths and weaknesses of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. The importance of validity, reliability, and generalizability is emphasized, with references to various studies and articles.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: COMMON ASSESSMENT PROJECT AND PEER REVIEWS1 Common Assessment Project and Peer Reviews Name of the Student: Name of the University: Course Number:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
COMMON ASSESSMENT PROJECT AND PEER REVIEWS2 Research 1 In this research, the usage of social theory throughout and within the healthcare industry has been highlighted. The main strengths of using qualitative research in the study are as follows: All topics and the problems are completely covered throughout the research in a detailed manner, in this study also helped to interpret the social processes and potentially explained the findings also. On the contrary, some of the major weaknesses for performing this research are as follows: The data that is collected in the study is limited in a small group as the assumptions cannot be made beyond that, and it has been also observed that as the data is quite big in quantity so the interpretation also takes a lot of time (Meyer and Ward, 2014). In case of the validity of qualitative research, the major challenge starts from the epistemology and ontology with regards to the issues that are being studied. Furthermore, for enhancing the validity different methods were adopted. Research 2 In this specific article quantitative research method has been considered for performing this entire study. It has been observed that quantitative research also plays a vital role in the healthcare segment. The main strengths of this research are: it provides almost accurate numerical, statistical and mathematical results, and it also seeks to answers for the questions of why, how, where, who and when (Leung, 2015). The major weaknesses of performing this research are: The knowledge produced by this method can be quite general and abstract for direct application to the particular local situations and individuals.
COMMON ASSESSMENT PROJECT AND PEER REVIEWS3 The reliability with regards to the quantitative research mainly refers to the diversified paradigms and it is quite challenging in this method. The validity generally means to which extent a concept is particularly measured with regards to the quantitative study. It depends on the study completely if it meets the exact criteria like it has met in this study then it can be termed as valid. The recommendations for improvement are to use the new perspectives from the quantitative method because it can help to assist an individual for the next research goal in this segment. Research 3 In this article, it has been showcased that the mixed methods have been used in the healthcare industry. Mixed methods are one of the most emerging methodologies in the entire field of research that mixed the qualitative and quantitative data together within a single investigation (Wisdom and Creswell, 2013). It is the method that has been mainly born from the social sciences and nowadays it is been used widely used in the medical and the science field such as mental health, nursing, pharmacy, and etcetera. The main strengths of using this method are: It reflects the patient's point of view, methodological flexibility is provided, and it also contrasts the qualitative and quantitative data. The weaknesses of this method are: the Increased amount is required by this method, the evaluations become quite complex in nature. In the mixed method, various types of procedures for collecting data and obtaining that particular information via different sources can enhance the reliability and validity of the data and its interpretation. Research 4 Observational research that is a part of the quantitative research has been reflected entirely in this study. It is an intervention with regards to the context of the research in the
COMMON ASSESSMENT PROJECT AND PEER REVIEWS4 biomedical field for the purpose of the risk reduction strategy. Furthermore, in the observational research, the results are mainly measured without the help of the researchers applying any kind of intervention (Howlett, 2013). One of the biggest strength of this method is that it can be used for identifying variables and trends of interest. The main disadvantage of this method is it is quite time-consuming in nature. The reliability depends upon study and if the observational techniques are unreliable then it results in highly invalid data. The future research needs robust spectator training, crystal clear measurable criteria for evaluating the domain knowledge of the researcher and the observational competence.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
COMMON ASSESSMENT PROJECT AND PEER REVIEWS5 References Howlett, B. (2013). Healthcare Research Methods. Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research.Journal of family medicine and primary care,4(3), 324. Meyer, S., and Ward, P. (2014). ‘How to’use social theory within and throughout qualitative research in healthcare contexts.Sociology Compass,8(5), 525-539. Wisdom, J., and Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models.Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.