This Common Law Assignment provides an in-depth analysis of business law, including sources of law, contracts, ethics, and legal remedies. It explores the Australian legal system and the importance of ethical standards in business.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
COMMON LAW ASSIGNMENT
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Contents BUSINESS LAW..................................................................................................................................3
BUSINESS LAW Business law refers to the body of laws which is regulated to manage and control the activities in the business. In refers to business laws which is designed by the Australian government to manage and control the activities in business. Laws are morally imposed in respect of managing the social, cultural and economic factors which resulting in adapting the change in right manner1. In this essay the discussion is based upon the sources of law and also its perspective of managing the business entities in better way. It also carries the forms of contract which is made between the partiesand also they are legally bound to follow the contract as per the set terms. It also stated that ethics is to be maintained in the business regarding not committing breach in any of the terms which is imposed under the contract act. Laws are mainly imposed upon the business in respect of securing the right of the parties to deal in any type of transaction. In modern times, it is Necessary to amend the laws due to changes in time and thus by this aspects ethical standards are to set which they had to achieved within the stipulated time period2. As it is not proven that every person entered in the business are in favor of performing the contract as per the set indication. Thus breaches raised in respect of performing the contract with the set terms. In respect of sources of law, it is stated that it carries two forms such as statue law and common law. In context of common law, it stated that the judges interpreted the decision on the bases of referring the previous cases and then accordingly the decision is passed3. In respect of statue law, it is stipulated that they refers the judgment by viewing the laws mentioned under the constitution. Usually in case of business, they had to follow the legislation mentioned under the corporation act, 2001. This is explained with the case of Taylor V Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 as in this case the issues is raised regarding entering into the false agreement with Johnson regarding purchasing the land for the particular amount. But due to carrying confusion in respect of deciding the amount, Johnson refuse to perform the contract4. Taylor demands for the specific performances of the contract but due to carrying mistaken about the amount. The contract is repudiated and also new contract is formed in which both the parties mutually decide to enter into the contract as per the new norms or standards. In respect of undertaking the matters of the jurisdiction, it is stated that the every terms whatever implied and express terms are equivalent in the eyes of laws and thus the 1Allen, D., & Blackham, A. (2018, June). Confidentiality and Settlement: Uncovering the Hidden Secrets of the Enforcement of Equality Law in Australia and the UK. InBerkeley Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law Study Group 2018 Conference at Melbourne Law School at the University of Melbourne. 2Gardner, J., & Kariyawasam, K. (2019). Online Auctions and Consumer Protection in the United Kingdom and Australia: The Value of Transparency. 3Gray, A. (2019). Sponsor pressure to discipline employees who have unexpressed unwelcome views and reform of the business torts in Australia.Australian Business Law Review.47(5). 349-363. 4Di Lieto, G., & Treisman, D. (2018). International Trade Law.International Trade Law, Textbook published by The Federation Press, Sydney (Australia).
person can file the suit under both the terms in case of infringing their rights. As jurisdiction carry the power to hear the matters which is related to civil and criminal matters5. In terms of legislation, it is stated that the federal courts carry the rights to hear the cases in which the infringement of the federal cases are stipulated. Ethical standards are applied to the business in respect of entering into the valid terms and agreement. In respect of Contract Act, the parties must enter into the agreement regarding entering the contract in respect of making an offer on particular things and other person is accepting the offer6. It is necessary that the parties must be competent to handle the contract and such contract is made with the mutual consent. The contract must be made on the bases of consideration. In this case, ethics reflects in the terms of contract act. As it is necessary for the both the parties to follow the essential elements which is required to make the contract valid. As offer is to be made to the parties in ethical way. This is presented through examining the respective case as Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. as in this case the company offer to buy the balls through the mode of advertisement and thus in respect of getting benefits of such purchase, Carlill deal to buy the balls. But after using the balls, he suffered with the diseases. Carlill file the suit in the court regarding claims for the damages in respect of hiding the real situation which is undertaken after using the products. In respect of acceptance of the offer, it is stated that it is necessary to communicate the offer before entering into the contract. The offerror carry the right to terminate the contract before they gets acceptance from the offerree regarding carrying forward the contract on the stipulated terms of contract7. The parties cannot claim for the damages, if the time period of the contract is expired or also made on the bases of counter offer. This indicates that the other part demand to counter offer the contract on the bases of their respective terms which they stipulated upon the contract. This refers to the ethical standards which is imposed upon the business regarding working under the norms stipulated by the government. In respect of oral forms, the contract is not valid if both the parties orally decide to exchange some valuable things with each other or promise to pay the money in future. In terms of laws such contract are not valid and also no person imposed any of the remedy regarding getting justice on particular case. If any of the party mutually decide whether to carry the contract in future perspective or not, than it refers to be ethical. Ethics in laws terms refers the matters which are legally and bound upon the party to follow under the guidelines mentioned under the contract act8. As it is tough to impose any laws in the country, as before imposing any laws, it is necessary that bill is to passed regarding making any new laws which is necessary in the business. It is duty of the public authorities to inspect the changes and then 5Miller, R. L. (2016).Business Law Today, Comprehensive. Cengage learning. 6O'Brien, L., Ramsay, I., & Ali, P. (2018). The hidden dimension of business bankruptcy in Australia.Australian Business Law Review.46(5). 291-306. 7Long, Z., & Huang, S. (2019). A Comparative Study of Transfer Pricing Taxation System between China and Australia.Journal of Chinese Tax and Policy.5(1). 8Chen, X. & et.al., (2018). The Effect of Sanctions on Continuous Disclosure Under the Responsive Enforcement Strategy: Evidence from Australia.Available at SSRN 3221640.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
pass the bill to the further committee9. The stability of the bill depends upon the voting which is undertaken in the committed and after finalizing the bill and also gets approval from all the committee, the bill is signed by head of the government. Similarly in case of remedy which is imposed regarding resolving the issues which is arisinginthecountryisrelatingtothedamagesorinjunctionorimposingspecific performances of the contract. In case of common law remedies, it is imposed in respect of paying damages to compensate for the losses incurred10. Through this manner, it indicates that the defendant are liable to pay the actual damages in respect of breach committed. It is necessary that in mostly cases the court decide the amount of damages to be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also carry the right to terminate the contract with the stated terms and such termination is mainly undertaken regarding not facing any issues in adapting the work11. As the right of terminate is mainly carried by the parties whose rights are affected in respect of not performing the contract as per the set terms. Injunction is the legal remedy which is mainly provided by the courts after getting suggestion from the parties whose rights are infringed. If any of the party not perform the contract and also not complete the order which is set in the contract or the issues is raised in respect of entering into the contract with the third party12. The other party carry the right to place injunction regarding stopping the party to perform the contract. They can also demand for the specific performance of the contract, if the contract is necessary to be fulfilled as per the terms of the plaintiff. The legal issue which is raised is relating to the not resolving the issues between the parties or it carries the costly and time consuming procedure. Thus, in such cases court demand to take the services which is provided out of court such as in case of appointing the arbitrator to settle the matters. The decision which is provide by arbitrator is also bound upon the person and also after their rewards, no person can further reach to court for not satisfying the arbitrator decisions13. Thus, through this manner, they can resolve the issues in better manner and also can save the time and cost regarding spending for further cases. 9Uddin, N. (2019). Rahul K. Gairola PhD (University of Washington, USA) is The Krishna Somers Lecturer in English & Postcolonial Literature in the College of Arts, Business, Law, & Social Sciences and a Fellow of the Asia Research Centre at Murdoch University in Perth, Western Australia. He is the author of Homelandings: Postcolonial. 10Benjamin, J& et.al (2018). Underwater archaeology and submerged landscapes in Western Australia.Antiquity.92(363). 11Brown, E. F. (2016). Lessons from efforts to manage the shift of pensions to defined contribution plans in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.Am. Bus. LJ.53. 315. 12Eagle, L., McCarthy, B., & Low, D. (2018). Winds of change: a study of the acceptability of renewable energy in regional Australia. 13Clarkson, K. W., & Miller, R. L. (2020).Business law: Text and cases. Cengage Learning.
From this essay, it concluded that the Australian legal system impose the judgment on the bases of referring the case through the common law or statue law. As in context of business, it is stated that the laws are imposed in respect of working under the set norms mentioned under the Corporation act, 2001. It is discussed that ethical standards are to be maintained in respect of entering into the contract. It is necessary to offer some valuable things to another person and the other person accepts such offer. The offer must be made on the bases of consideration. Various legal solution are given to the parties regarding resolving the disputes in better manner.