Postal Rules and Modern Communication

This assignment examines the history and application of postal rules in contract law. It traces the origins of these rules back to the 19th century and explores how they were adapted for electronic communications through legislation like the Electronic Transactions Act. The discussion also analyzes the difficulties in applying postal rules to modern communication methods due to their instantaneous nature, highlighting the need for further legislative development.

Postal Rules 2
Introduction
Postal rules provide a leading exception in context of the rules regarding the date of offer
or acceptance under the contract law. Through the postal rules, the problems regarding distant
communications are ruled out. Since the inception of postal rules back in 1818, these have
changed a lot and have developed further owing to the creation of modern communications. In
businesses, long distance communications are common and these cannot be avoided1. Through
the postal rules, the issues relating to remote communications was resolved. Though, the postal
rules still continue to be somewhat controversial and confusing. This is particularly due to the
highly developed information technology communications, which raises a question on
applicability of postal rules on modern communications.
In the following parts, the history of postal rules has been traced in addition to its present
standing. This is done in addition to the clash between supremacy of the postal rules and the two
legislations of Electronic Transactions Act, 19992 and the Electronic Transactions Act, 20003.
This would help in presenting a thorough analysis of postal rules based in common law and the
present statutory law of Australia.
Background of postal rules
Under the contract law, the two most crucial elements are the offer and acceptance. In
order for a contract to have legal validity, there is a need for these two elements being present.
The postal rules were brought out as being an exception to the general rule of date of acceptance
1 Jeffrey Frederick Fitzpatrick, Christopher F. Symes, Angelo Veljanovski and David Parker, Business and
Corporations Law (Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 3rd ed, 2017)
2 Electronic Transactions Act, 1999 (Cth)
3 Electronic Transactions Act, 2000 (Vic)

Postal Rules 3
and offer. Under the general rule of date of acceptance and offer, the offer could be revoked or
withdrawn any moment before the acceptance is given4. Often, conflicts are raised on whether a
particular offer has been revoked or accepted. This problematic issue between the offeree and
offeror is solved through the postal rules. The distant communications raise particular issues. The
mailings and posts are usually referred to as the snail mail as they could take a long duration in
reaching the recipient. This becomes problematic in revocation and formation of contracts. The
offerors could not know when these two took place5.
Through the case of Adam v Lindsell6, the postal rules were born. In this case, the court
had to decide on the period of contract creation through mail. The two parties of this case had
communicated through post where the exact time of acceptance could not be determined. This
was due to the fact that mailings usually lasted for a number of days and a number of parties
were not having the knowledge of the communication at that very moment7. This caused a
number of issues and resulted in postal rules being formed. Based on this case and the case of
Henthorn v Fraser8, the postal rules provide that in such cases where it is within the
contemplation of parties that based on the ordinary usage of mankind, the post could be used as a
manner of communicating the offer, the acceptance is to be deemed as completed upon the same
being posted9.
When it comes to the one-on-one situations, the business parties can communicate where
the questions are raised. In the environment of indirect business or distant contracting, the
4 Neil Andrews, Contract Law (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed, 2015)
5 Andy Gibson and Douglas Fraser, Business Law (Pearson Higher Education AU, 2013)
6 [1818] B & Ald 681
7 Paul Latimer, Australian Business Law 2012 (CCH Australia Limited, 31st ed, 2012)
8 [1892] 2 Ch 27
9 Phillip Lipton, Abe Herzberg, and Michelle Welsh, Understanding Company Law (Thomson Reuters, 18th ed,
2016)

Postal Rules 4
instantaneous mode of communicating is not available. When such a situation is raised, the
business parties seldom hold the knowledge of refusal of contract or that of its acceptance. Thus,
the postal rules help in solving the problematic issues, for instance in cases of delayed
communications. Postal rules basically dictated that the date of communication is the date of
posting the communication mail. So, the communicating party was not required to wait for the
receipt of such communication. This helped in eradicating the issue of delay in communication,
as in such cases where the postal rules were deemed as a valid mode of acceptance and where the
parties accepted to get a mail for reply, the date of acceptance or the relevant communication
would be the date of receipt10.
Impact of Postal Rules in context of statutes
The Electronic Transactions Act, 1999 was the act which was brought back on 15th
March, 2000 and this was a strategic policy of the Australian Government for developing the
information economic. The government of the nation particularly formed the electronic
commerce expert group for establishing the report for issues regarding the ecommerce, where the
Model Law on Electronic Commerce given by the United Nations Commission on International
Trade Law was applied11. As per the ecommerce expert group of the Attorney General, the nation
conducting business used contracts and for acceptance to take place, the place of parties had to
be clearly provided. The Electronic Transactions Act, 2000 was a response to this report. As per
this legislation, the electronic communication date and time of receipt in addition to the place of
communication could be descried based on the sending location and time of the party. Basically,
10 Stephen Graw, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (Thomson Reuters, 7th ed, 2011)
11 Ian Wakeman, Ehud Gudes and Christian Damsgaard Jense, Trust Management V: 5th IFIP WG 11.11
International Conference, IFIPTM 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 29 - July 1, 2011, Proceedings (Springer
Science & Business Media, 2011)

Postal Rules 5
the postal rules were applied in this act. However, this legislation was not applied on facsimile or
telex machines12.
Under the commonwealth Electronic Transactions Act, section 14 provides that the time
of dispatch is the time when the electronic communication leaves the information system of the
originator13. The time of receipt is provided under section 14A of this act which provides that the
time of receipt of electronic communication is the time on which the electronic communication
becomes capable of being retrieved by the addressee14. Section 14B provides the place of
dispatch and the place of receipt. This is the place on which the originator or the addressee has
their place of business15. Where these are matched with the postal rules, the postal rules dictate
that the date of the communication is the date on which the letter covering the communication is
posted. A crucial aspect of this is that in a clash between the common law and the legislation,
these two acts would prevail.
Applying postal rules to modern communication
In the modern era, communications are sent more than often through digital means and a
leading one in this regard is email. With the information technology developing, the distances
between the individuals are getting reduced on daily basis. The communications can easily be
made by individuals through different modes like the telephone, emails, online chats, messages
through applications, and the like. A number of professionals express the views which they hold
through the use of emails or the other online methods which are instantaneous communications.
12 Ronald J. Mann, Elizabeth Warren and Jay Lawrence Westbrook, Comprehensive Commercial Law: 2017
Statutory Supplement (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2017)
13 Electronic Transactions Act 1999, s14
14 Electronic Transactions Act 1999, s14A
15 Electronic Transactions Act 1999, s14B

Postal Rules 6
Based on this, there is an applicability of general acceptance rules here. The website acceptance
is dependent upon the space ad actual time of sending and the acceptance of such contract. An
example of this can be found in email communications which are deemed as different in
comparison to website contracting16.
When it comes to the email contracts, the legislative establishments were absent in
determining the revocation or acceptance of the offer. When the information was transmitted
through emails, it was deemed to be sent when the offering party gets online and presses on the
icon. The offeree could get the message when the same was sent successfully or where they got a
failed delivery notice in their mailbox. The internet or computers could take lot longer than
minutes to respond. In context of the timing issues in electronic transactions, the emails could
not be deemed as similar to contracting made through the websites, which is an example of
instantaneous method of communication in general17.
As there are a number of failure situations and delays in messages being sent and
received through emails, the instantaneous communications were not present between the parties.
This required the postal rules to be applied to the email contracts. But there was an absence on
the requisite legislations to decide on the status or timings of the emails. The website acceptances
could be clear on general rules and the same being applied on it. This resulted in the postal rules
to be developed and applied on the email communications in order to benefit all the parties. With
the technology developing at fast pace, the instant communication methods could bring an end to
the postal rules18.
16 Jill Poole, Casebook on Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 2016)
17 Richard Stone and James Devenney, Text, Cases and Materials on Contract Law (Routledge, 3rd ed, 2014)
18 John Cartwright, Contract Law: An Introduction to the English Law of Contract for the Civil Lawyer (Bloomsbury
Publishing, 3rd ed, 2016)

Postal Rules 7
With the passage of time, the courts have a crucial issue and this is to decide upon
whether the postal rules can be extended on the modern communications, particularly the
instantaneous communications. With the progress of the electronic methods, the dispatch and the
receipt of message often coincide and any kind of law which dealt with the delay in the two
communications, particularly the postal rules, would become obsolete or even useless. It has
already been proved that the telephonic conversations are given the same status as is given to the
communication taking place between two individuals in same room, resulting in the applicability
of receipt rules. This means that the communication has to be received by the offeror before the
contract can be made and this differs from the postal rules as the receipt had to be acknowledged
by the offeror. Though, there are cases where the dispatch does not result automatically in the
communication of acceptance19.
In Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation20, telex was brought before the court which
led to Lord Denning giving a number of examples of acceptance being communicated. This led
to him concluding that the rule of instantaneous communication amidst the parties differed from
the rules regarding post. The contract could only be completed when the same was received by
the offering party and upon the receipt of acceptance a contract was made. Thus, the
responsibility here was with the offering party for communicating the acceptance in an effective
manner before a contract is completed.
Unlike postal rules, this is not the case as the law does not favour the consumer but
adopts a practical approach and makes sense of the parties being aware of their position. This is
19 David M. Henkin, The Postal Age: The Emergence of Modern Communications in Nineteenth-Century America
(University of Chicago Press, 2008)
20 [1955] EWCA Civ 3

Postal Rules 8
due to the fact that the postal rules do not give the acknowledgement but the instantaneous
communications do. One cannot make an assumption that the acceptance message which is sent
in the normal business hours through instantaneous communications is reasonably received. A
problem is raised when this method is used but the message is not instantaneous. It is practical to
adopt the approach that all messages could be sent at all times. This begs the need of laws
pertaining to instantaneous communications to be more fair and concise in comparison to postal
rules21.
There is one more practical problem in this regard. Where postal rules are applied on
electronic communications of present day like whatsapp or Facebook messenger, it would
become difficult to determine the exact time and location of such messages and the exact
moment on which the contract was formed. This is due to parties claiming the lack of intention
and the issues like request for information supply for information and the other concepts
revolving around offer and acceptance becoming jumbled up.
Conclusion
To bring the discussion to its conclusion, the preceding parts highlighted the various
aspects revolving around postal rules. The discussion not only highlighted what exactly postal
rules are but also traced back its history. Established back in 1800s, the postal rules provide the
rule that the date of communication is the date on which such communication is mailed or
posted. With the advancement of information technology, and the communications like emails,
the crux of postal rules was applied on the email communications and this led to the advent of
the commonwealth and Victorian legislations of Electronic Transaction Act. In these legislations,
21 At 5

Postal Rules 9
the provisions were covered for the exact time and location of electronic communication being
sent. Even though these are aligned with postal rules, in situations of clash between the two, the
legislation prevails. However, the application of postal rules to the modern communications is
difficult task due to the swift nature of these communications being exchanged. And for this
purpose, pertinent legislation would be needed.

Postal Rules 10
Bibliography
A. Articles/ Books/ Journals
Andrews N, Contract Law (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed, 2015)
Cartwright J, Contract Law: An Introduction to the English Law of Contract for the Civil Lawyer
(Bloomsbury Publishing, 3rd ed, 2016)
Fitzpatrick JF, Symes CF, Veljanovski A and Parker D, Business and Corporations Law (Lexis
Nexis Butterworths, 3rd ed, 2017)
Gibson A and Fraser D, Business Law (Pearson Higher Education AU, 2013)
Graw S, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (Thomson Reuters, 7th ed, 2011)
Henkin DM, The Postal Age: The Emergence of Modern Communications in Nineteenth-Century
America (University of Chicago Press, 2008)
Latimer P, Australian Business Law 2012 (CCH Australia Limited, 31st ed, 2012)
Lipton P, Herzberg A, and Welsh M, Understanding Company Law (Thomson Reuters, 18th ed,
2016)
Mann RJ, Warren E and Westbrook JL, Comprehensive Commercial Law: 2017 Statutory
Supplement (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2017)
Poole J, Casebook on Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 2016)
Stone R and Devenney J, Text, Cases and Materials on Contract Law (Routledge, 3rd ed, 2014)

Postal Rules 11
Wakeman I, Gudes E and Jense CD, Trust Management V: 5th IFIP WG 11.11 International
Conference, IFIPTM 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 29 - July 1, 2011, Proceedings
(Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)
B. Cases
Adam v Lindsell [1818] B & Ald 681
Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] EWCA Civ 3
Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27
C. Legislations
Electronic Transactions Act, 1999 (Cth)
Electronic Transactions Act, 2000 (Vic)