2COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report provides information regarding the financial performance ofCOCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services and COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Services based on last five years.The ratio analysis has been used to complete the financial analysis of the company. As per the analysis the main issue that can be observed is that the net profit margin ratio ofCOGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Servicesis very low in comparison toCOCHLEARLIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services. Thus, for better return it is feasible for the investor to invest in COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services.
3COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION:........................................................................................................4 IDENTIFICATION OF THE ISSUES:.........................................................................4 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:............................................................................................4 Debt to Asset Ratio:...................................................................................................4 Debt to Equity Ratio:.................................................................................................5 Assets to Equity Ratio:...............................................................................................5 Receivables Turnover Ratio:......................................................................................6 Total Asset Turnover Ratio:.......................................................................................7 Current Ratio:.............................................................................................................7 Cash Ratio:.................................................................................................................8 Gross Profit Margin Ratio:.........................................................................................9 Net Profit Margin Ratio:............................................................................................9 Operating Cash Flow Ratio:.....................................................................................10 RECOMMENDATION:..............................................................................................10 REFERENCING:.........................................................................................................12
4COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS INTRODUCTION: The financial statement analysis holds a considerable amount of importance for an investor. It is the financial statement that provides complete overview about the company’s performance in a single accounting year. The financial ratios is also one of the financial statement analysis that provides complete insight about the company’s financial performance in a single financial year. Thus, to analyse the financial performance of COH and CGS leverage ratios, profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, asset utilization ratios and cash flow ratios are being analysed to oversee which company performed well. IDENTIFICATION OF THE ISSUES: COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services and COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Services are the two Australian companies that mainly deals with the medical instruments of the country. To analyse the performance of both the company’s ratio analysis has been performed. The analysis has been performed based on the five years of financial performance of the company. The main problem that can be identified while analysing the financial statements of both the companies is that the net profit of both the companies is low in spite of having high revenue. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: Debt to Asset Ratio: As per the analysis it can be said that COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services performed low in comparison to COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Services. The percentage of assets that borrowed by COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services is higher in comparison to its counterpart.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS 20192018201720162015 0.0000 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 DEBT-TO-ASSETS RATIO Debt to Equity Ratio: As per the analysis it can be determined that the debt to equity ratio of both the company is below 1 on last five years. This indicates that the dependency of the company on the equity for both companies is low and hence the company are expected to have strong sustainability. 20192018201720162015 0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200 1.400 1.600 DEBT-TO-EQUITY RATIO Assets to Equity Ratio: The asset to equity ratio for both the company is almost similar in last five years.
6COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS As per the analysis both the company tried to collect fund from the market through equity. If the dependency on the equity increase in future then the companies can face some serious problems. 20192018201720162015 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 ASSETS-TO-EQUITY RATIO Receivables Turnover Ratio: As per the analysis it can be determined that both the companies have sufficient abilities to collect the receivables from the client. The last five-year analysis of both the companies states that the company has sufficient resources to collect the receivables from the market. 20192018201720162015 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.500 RECEIVABLES TURNOVER RATIO
7COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS Total Asset Turnover Ratio: The company’s ability to generate sales from the market are being analysed using this ratio. As per the analysis of the asset turnover ratio of both the companies, the ability to generate sales from the assets is pretty high. Both the companies are more or less same. The asset turnover ratio of both the company in last five years is above 1, which means that the company’s liquidity position is in good state. 20192018201720162015 0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200 1.400 1.600 1.800 TOTAL ASSET TURNOVER RATIO Current Ratio: The ability to pay up the short-term debt using the current assets for both the company is very high. that COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services performed behave better performance in recent years in comparison to its counterpart. In last five years that COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services able to accumulate current assets and reduce the current liabilities, which was not the case for COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Services (Huang, Yan, and Gang Kou 2014). Thus, the financial performance of that COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services performed in recent years is much better in comparison to COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Service.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
8COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS 20192018201720162015 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 CURRENT RATIO Cash Ratio: The ability to meet the current liabilities of the company using the cash and cash equivalent can be determined using the cash ratio. As per the analysis of the annual report of five years ofCOCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services and COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Services it can be determined that both the companies have strong ability to meet the short-term obligations. 20192018201720162015 0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200 1.400 1.600 1.800 CASH RATIO
9COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS Gross Profit Margin Ratio: As per the analysis it can be determined that the gross profit of COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services is much better in comparison to its counterpart. 20192018201720162015 0.000% 20.000% 40.000% 60.000% 80.000% 100.000% 120.000% GROSS PROFIT MARGIN Net Profit Margin Ratio: As per the analysis it can be determined that the net profit margin ratio in recent years of COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Services is pretty low in comparison to its counterpart (Altmanet al.,2017). The only reason that can be determined that in recent years the company started realizing losses due to which the profit margin of the company decreased.
10COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS 20192018201720162015 -40.000% -30.000% -20.000% -10.000% 0.000% 10.000% 20.000% 30.000% NET PROFIT M ARGIN RATIO Operating Cash Flow Ratio: Operating cash flow ratio measures the company’s ability to meet the short-term obligations. As per the analysis it can be determined that COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Services performed low in comparison to its counterpart. 20192018201720162015 -1.000 -0.800 -0.600 -0.400 -0.200 0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 OPERATING CASH FLOW RATIO RECOMMENDATION: After analysing the financial ratios of both te companies it can be determined that both the company’s liquidity position is pretty strong. The ability to collect cash from the supplier and the client is also strong for both the company. The main problem lies with the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
11COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS company’s profitability. In recent years COGSTATE LTD (CGS) Health Care Equipment & Services incurred losses, which ultimately reduced the financial performance of the company and thus, it is advisable to invest in COCHLEAR LIMITED (COH) Health Care Equipment & Services.
12COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATIOS REFERENCING: Altman, Edward I., Małgorzata Iwanicz‐Drozdowska, Erkki K. Laitinen, and Arto Suvas. "Financial distress prediction in an international context: A review and empirical analysis of Altman's Z‐score model."Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting28, no. 2 (2017): 131-171. http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/C/ASX_COH_2017.pdf http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/C/ASX_COH_2016.pdf http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/C/ASX_COH_2017.pdf http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReports/PDF/ASX_COH_2018.pdf https://www.cochlear.com/c782c6e8-cd66-402e-87b8-936db9f1fea8/2019AnnualReport.pdf? MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE- c782c6e8-cd66-402e-87b8-936db9f1fea8-mOnUHj- https://www.cogstate.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/2016-Annual-Report-Web.pdf https://www.cogstate.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Annual-Report-to-shareholders-21- Sept-18.pdf https://www.cogstate.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Annual-Report.pdf Huang, Yan, and Gang Kou. "A kernel entropy manifold learning approach for financial data analysis."Decision Support Systems64 (2014): 31-42.