A Comparison of Accuro EMR and Wolf EMR Software Systems

This report provides a detailed comparison of two Electronic Medical Record (EMR) software systems: Accuro EMR by QHR technologies and Wolf EMR by TELUS physician solution. The report examines the types of offices that utilize each system, highlighting their respective target markets and functionalities. It discusses common features such as billing solutions, charting capabilities, workflows, E/M coding, lab integration, and meaningful use certifications. Furthermore, the report differentiates the two systems by analyzing their unique features, such as personalized care and streamlined workflows in Wolf EMR, and clinic tools and patient management software in Accuro EMR. The report also delves into the kind of technical support offered to users by each system, including training and implementation support for Accuro EMR and centralized processes for Wolf EMR. The report concludes by suggesting that Wolf EMR is the better option, leveraging integrated tools and a standard-based platform for improved care delivery. Finally, the report includes a list of references used in the analysis.

Running head: EMR SOFTWARE SYSTEMS
EMR software systems
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author Note

1EMR SOFTWARE SYSTEMS
Comparison and discussion on accuro EMR by QHR technologies and wolf EMR
by TELUS physician solution:
Name of the systems:
The name of the systems is “wolf EMR by TELUS physician solution” and “Accuro EMR by
QHR technologies”.
Types of offices that the systems can be used in:
Accuro EMR by QHR technologies has been used under the offices that make use of Clinic
Tool and EMR software. Further, various offices using client supports, product updates, different
EMR migrations, various onsite training along with remote training and cloud EMR hosting also
makes use of the system.
On the other hand, wolf EMR by TELUS physician solution is used by various healthcare
organizations. The practice can be used with the EMR solutions that are cloud based for managing
patient records. They must get the practice of a management solution that is simple to use. This is
suitable for various practices types with the customized to meet the necessities.
Discussion on the common features:
First of all both the EMR solutions are helpful to make quick, integrated and painless
solutions for billing. Then, it helps in charting. It never encourages the charting in real time leading
to burnout, inaccuracy, stress and unfinished charts. Next, it helps in workflows. Both of then
provides the customizable workflows and keeps every people on track. Further, there is E/M Coding.
This is useful to complying with the management and evaluation of document standards. Here, the

2EMR SOFTWARE SYSTEMS
standards as been ensuring the payers of healthcare to have the data they need to pay out (Zaidan et
al., 2015). Next, there is lab integration. It involves the e-prescribing, capability for seamlessly
monitor the analysis, delivery, outcomes and degree of certainty in an electronic manner. These have
been incredibly helpful relying on the way how the lab-dependent the practice has been. Moreover,
both of them helps in meaningful use of certifications. For example, various programs have been
offering the cash money for pepping who can be proved that they have been performing the
meaningful usage of the certified technology of EHR.
Features that have been setting them apart:
The “Wolf EMR by TELUS physician solution” has been providing personalized care. Tis is
helpful to access the real-time patient data and advantages from various integrated tools for
supporting the management of chronic disease. Next, it deals with streamlining the workflows.
Business can spend lesser time on the administration having effective scheduling, clinical and billing
tools. These are helpful to mane activities like lab reports and referrals. Apart from this, the EMR
has access to move on. One can stay connected to the patients and clinics in office and move on. The
business is able to upload the patient charts to patients, checking the schedule fetch encounter notes
and much more with the efficient app of the mobile app of TELUS EMR (Weber & Price, 2016).
On the other hand, Accuro EMR by QHR technologies, has been fund to be bust with virus
practices. This is impossible for leaving n time with the charts to be done. Thus, there are Accuro
EMR supports that has quality time with the patients and is useful to get the life back. Again, Accuro
EMR has been offering the suite of clinic tools and the software of patent management that makes
empowerment and engage the patients through using the rise of overall productivity. Again, there are
clinic tools that are been both intuitive and individualizes. Here, the practice has been spending on
much time on what has been vitally known to be patient care.

3EMR SOFTWARE SYSTEMS
Kind of technical support for users:
Accuro comprises of training, sales specialists and implementation over the ground. This is
to get ready for providing the local-in person supports every province they operate. They comprise
of more than 70 numbers of customer service with about 40 migration exerts. Thus, one can rest to
know that the transition to the Accuro EMR has been under good hands.
On the other hand, wolf EMR is helpful to centralize the processes. Thus, one can develop
the productivity to be more effective scheduling, patient health managing and the billing. This can be
done through tracking the patient interactions under a consolidated digital chart. Moreover, it has
been supporting patient care with simplified templates and various pre-populated forms. This is
helpful to develop the medication management having the medication, allergy and built-in
prescriptions (Christodoulakis, Asgarian & Easterbrook, 2017). Moreover, Wolf has been offering
powerful searches and support of decision making for enabling the customized queries and various
alerts at the patient level. Besides, they have been empowering the patients in booking the online
appointments and deliver access to personal health data with the help of user-friendly applications.
Understanding which of them is better:
The Wolf EMR is a better option here. It has been leveraging the huge array of integrated
tools. The standard based platform TELUS Heath Exchange enable the clinicians in communicating
around the primary care settings for helping to develop the care delivery.

4EMR SOFTWARE SYSTEMS
References:
Christodoulakis, C., Asgarian, A., & Easterbrook, S. (2017, November). Barriers to adoption of
information technology in healthcare. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International
Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (pp. 66-75). IBM Corp..
Dong, L., & Keshavjee, K. (2016). Why is information governance important for electronic
healthcare systems? A Canadian experience. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social
Sciences, 2(5), 250-260.
McFarlane, C., Beer, M., Brown, J., & Prendergast, N. (2017). Patientory: A Healthcare Peer-to-Peer
EMR Storage Network v1. Entrust Inc.: Addison, TX, USA.
Weber, J. H., & Price, M. (2016, May). Closing the gap—Enacting knowledge transfer between
engineering and use of healthcare software. In 2016 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on
Software Engineering in Healthcare Systems (SEHS) (pp. 19-25). IEEE.
Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Al-Haiqi, A., Kiah, M. L. M., Hussain, M., & Abdulnabi, M. (2015).
Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP
and TOPSIS. Journal of biomedical informatics, 53, 390-404.
Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Hussain, M., Haiqi, A., Kiah, M. M., & Abdulnabi, M. (2015). Multi-
criteria analysis for OS-EMR software selection problem: A comparative study. Decision
Support Systems, 78, 15-27.