Ask a question from expert

Ask now

Comparison of performance based design and forced based design PDF

19 Pages3839 Words131 Views
   

Added on  2021-08-30

Comparison of performance based design and forced based design PDF

   Added on 2021-08-30

BookmarkShareRelated Documents
COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN AND FORCED BASED DESIGN
APPROACH FOR HIGH RISE CONCRETE BUILDING
ABSTRACT:
The main objective of this report is the understanding of the impact of multihazard loading, brought by
wind and earthquakes, on the behavior of high-rise buildings, in order to apply such knowledge to design.
The main contributions of the current study are summarized as follows:
(i)For dynamics and response under wind loads, general agreements between the results of the pressure
integration technique and the aeroelastic experiment exist. However, the effect of the aerodynamic
damping on the worst responses of a multi story building/highrise in the two lateral directions is shown
to be positive, which resulted in partial response reduction.
(ii)The study that will be discussed in this project report will show that it is advantageous to predict the
responses of tall buildings in their preliminary design stages as this can provide an opportunity to rotate
the building to an optimal orientation that can lead to significant reduction in the responses. The results
will show that the worst peak acceleration is reduced by 38.5%, by rotating the building (multi story
building/highrise) to a suggested orientation. This reduction is achieved without adding any structural
elements/components to the primary building (no additional cost).
(iii)The results that will be done for load calculations in this project will show that wind and earthquake
loads are different from each other and are also different from static loads. This comes from the spectral
comparison of the response of a high-rise building under the two types of excitation. The results indicate
that earthquake loads excite higher modes that produce less interstory drift but higher acceleration which
occurs for a relatively short time (compared to wind loads)..
(iv)Although the acceleration under wind loads is lower than that under earthquake loads, it occurs for
longer periods that become a comfort issue.
(v)It seems that tall buildings designed for wind are safe under moderate earthquake loads. Nevertheless,
it is important to mention that, even if the interstory drift ratios in tall buildings may be relatively small
with no significant apparent issues for the main force resisting system of the structure, nonstructural
systems may represent a high percentage of loss exposure of buildings to earthquakes due to high floor
acceleration. Accordingly, appropriate damping techniques are recommended for response reduction
under wind and earthquake loads.
Seismic design of structures is commonly based on strength or force considerations rather than
displacement as the seismic design codes generally use lateral inertia forces to account for seismic ground
motion effects. The distribution of these static forces (and therefore, stiffness and strength) is based
implicitly on the elastic vibration modes [1, 2]. Therefore, as structures exceed their elastic limits in
severe earthquakes, the use of inertia forces corresponding to elastic modes may not lead to the optimum
distribution of structural properties [2, 3]. The need for finding cost-efficient and optimum structural
designs has led to the development of different structural optimization methodologies. Optimum design of
structures for seismic loads has been studied by many researchers over the past decades [4-8]. The
conventional methods used in these studies are usually gradient-based solution strategies that require the
satisfaction of some specific mathematical conditions. Due to the difficulty in calculating appropriate
Comparison of performance based design and forced based design PDF_1
expressions for optimisation constraints, these methods cannot be practically applied for optimum design
of nonlinear structures subjected to seismic excitations.
INTRODUCTION:
In today‟s era the aim of limiting excessive damage and to maintain functionality of the building after an
earthquake is becoming more desirable. In order to predict damage to a structure in an earthquake,
performance based design method is a new method which is rapidly gaining popularity. It is well known
that structures designed by current codes undergo large inelastic deformations during high earthquakes.
However, current seismic design approach is generally based on elastic analysis. The seismic design of
structures is continuously evolving. Conventional design procedures have the objective of achieving life
safety in a structure by providing sufficient strength and ductility to resist whole or partial collapse of the
structure. Structures designed according to current seismic design provisions or design code should, in
general, satisfy the following rules. First, to resist minor level of earthquake ground motions without
damage; second, to resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage, but may experience some non-
structural damage; and finally, to resist major earthquakes without collapse, but possibly with some
structural and/or non-structural damage. The unexpectedly high financial losses related to functional
downtime and non-structural damage from recent large earthquakes near prime locations emphasizes the
limitations behind the current ductile designs using FBD method. In the current Indian design practice, it
is common to calculate design base shear from code specified spectral acceleration, with the assumption
that structure to behave elastic. It is also reduced by response reduction factor R. the design forces is also
influenced by importance factor I, based on occupancy. By the use of these parameters lateral forces are
found, member size will be selected from design results and then analysis regarding drift and deflection of
the structure is done, which must be within an acceptable limit. Sometime the structures experienced high
earthquake forces however, the structures designed by such procedures have been found to undergo
inelastic deformations in a somewhat „uncontrolled‟ manner. This may results undesirable and
unpredictable behavior, sometimes total collapse, or difficult and costly repair works. So the societal
requirements are pushing the practice to achieving higher levels of performance, safety and economy,
including life-cycle costs. Performance Based Plastic Design is a recent designing concept of seismic
resistant structure, in which the design criteria are expressed in terms of achieving stated performance
objectives when the structure is subjected to higher level of seismic hazards. Since 1994 Northbridge
earthquake and other earthquakes in the world during the end of 20th century led the structural engineer
to use the concept of Performance based design.
DESIGN OF A STRUCTURE OF HIGHRISE BUILDING AND ITS CALCULATIONS:
Structures tare ta tgroup tsuch tas tbeams, tcolumns, tslabs, tfoundations, tgirders, tand ttrusses, tthat
twork tas ta tunit tto tfulfill ta tpurpose. tAn tengineer's tduty tis tto tdesign tstructures tin ta tprofessional,
tsafe, tand teconomical tmanner tin torder tto tfulfill tthe tpurpose tfor twhich tit twas tdesigned tin tthe
tfirst tplace. tStructures tas tclassified tinto teither tbeing tstatically tdeterminate tor tstatically
tindeterminate.
Statically tdeterminate tstructures tare tstructures tthat tcan tbe tanalyzed tusing tstatics tequations tonly,
t(i.e., tequilibrium tin tall tdirections). tOn tthe tother thand, tstatically tindeterminate tstructures tcan't tbe
tanalyzed tusing tstatics tequations tonly; tthey trequire tother tmaterial tproperties, tsuch tas
Comparison of performance based design and forced based design PDF_2
tdeformations, tin torder tto tanalyze tthem.When tengineers tconduct tstructural tanalysis, tthey tcalculate
tthe treaction tforces tdue tto tthe texternal tforces tapplied tto tthe tstructure tas twell tas tinternal tforces,
tsuch tas tthe tbending tmoment, tshear tforce, tand tnormal tforce. tStructural tanalysis tis tnecessary tfor
tstructural tdesign tin torder tfor tthe tstructural tengineer tto tchoose tthe tproper tsizes tand tmaterials tso
tthe tstructure tcan teconomically tand teffectively tresist tthe teffects tof tthe tpossible texternal tloads
tapplied tto tit.
METHADOLOGY OF STRUCTURE DESIGN
This tproject tcompare tbraced tand tunbraced tframes tapplied tto teuro tcode tEC tand tBritish tstandard
tBS5950.
Method tused tto tcompare tare thand tcalculation, tand tsoftware tsuch tas tstrand7 tand trobot
tanalysis. tAs tan tengineer twe tknow tthat tone tonly ttrial twouldn’t tbe tsatisfactory tto tmake
ta tpoint, tso tit thas tbeen tcreated tbuilding tfor teach tprocedure tand teach tprocedure tcontain
tdesigning tof tEUROCODE tand tBRITISH tSTANDARD twith ttwo tdifferent tdimensions tas
tdimensions tcan taffect tthe tbuckling tand tbending tof tthe tmember, tand tP-delta tfactor thas
tbeen tanalysed.
Drawing tare tbeen tmade ton tAUTOCADt(figure1) tthen ttransferred tto trobot tfor tthe
tanalysis.
After teach tmember tdesign, ta ttype tof tcross tsectional tarea tis tbeen tchosen tfrom tthe tBlue
tbook tbased ton ttheir tresistance tformulated ton tthe tcalculation.
LOAD TYPE Dead tLoad
Dead tload tas twell tas tknown tas tthe tpermanent tload. tAll tthe tmembers ttaking tpart ton
tthe tstructure tand tkeeping ttogether tthe tstructure tare tcalled tdead tLoads, tas teach thas tits
town tweight tand teffects tthe tstiffens tof tthe tnext tpermanent tmember. tGood texamples tare:
tslab, tbeam tcolumn, troof, tcladding tetc. In torder tto thave ta tsecure tand tdurable tmember ta
tsafety tfactor tis tused. tAs tof tthe tEuro-code timply ta tfactor tof t1.35, tand tBS tstandard
timply t1.4.
Comparison of performance based design and forced based design PDF_3

FIG 1: BASEMENT PLAN OF A HIGHRISE BUILDING SHOWING GRID STRUCTURE.
Comparison of performance based design and forced based design PDF_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
multi-stored buildings PDF
|50
|9027
|315

Damage-Based Assessment for Performance-Based Design and Analysis of Timber or Wood Structure Under Earthquake Load
|26
|5950
|63

Difference between Dead Loads, Imposed Loads, Live Loads, and Earthquake Loads
|7
|965
|129