Conflict Management Styles Theory 2022

Running head: MANAGEMENT
Management
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1MANAGEMENT
Introduction
The following paper will look to discuss on the various aspects of the conflict
management styles within the organizations. The conflicts are the most common factors in the
workplaces and it needs the proper handling so it can be stopped for the higher productivity level
within the organization (Hurt & Welbourne, 2018). There are various conflict management styles
that can be seen in the organizations of different cultures. In this paper, the conflict management
styles of dominating and compromising. Though these theories are quite contradictory to each
other but it has yielded better results for the understanding of the professional managers in the
workplace industries.
Positive sections
The central most important perspective for the managers is to make the decisions and
they have to be ready to take all these decisions properly. Otherwise, they cannot run their
organizations with success in the positive directions. The foremost theory that can be found in
this scenario is the context of the compromising theory (Hurt & Welbourne, 2018). The
compromising theory is definitely the most crucial fact for the managers since they have to face
many precarious situations within the workplace where they find it very difficult to be strict in all
the contexts (Tjosvold, Wong & Feng Chen, 2014).
This type of skill or theory has become very much valuable in the modern workplace
situations. This type of skill is basically very important for the owners of the small business
concerns since they have to manage various concerns and they have the task in hand to
strengthen their future properly. The deal negotiation is the most crucial fact behind this issue

2MANAGEMENT
indeed. The most difficult fact in this scenario for the managers is to know when they should
compromise and how this should compromise would work positively.
The perception of the compromise style has indeed become very much evident in all the
ways. It is because both the parties in deal would like to get the best share and the best results for
their part. In this scenario, one party must make the negotiations and comprise so the deal is not
cancelled and it is done properly. The needs are generally balanced through this method for both
the parties and all of them. Critics are of the opinion that this kind of conflict management style
will consume more time than the others.
Therefore, there is a high need that this process can be avoided but it will have to be used
in the most necessary cases (Tjosvold, Wong & Feng Chen, 2014). If this style has to be applied,
one must keep in notice that this kind of the conflict management style would definitely need
skills and capabilities of more people. Otherwise, this style cannot be implemented at all.
However, most business critics have said that this type of business conflict management style
can be more manageable and less problematic than the concept of avoidance. If one of the parties
keeps on avoiding the other, it might not lead to good results.
Negative sides
On the other hand, the comprising conflict management style will keep the partnerships
to carry on and make it more concrete in the future. People who prefer the compromising style
are very good listeners and they can solve the issues properly within a proper scenario. Both the
parties will feel the sense of victory since both their interests will be kept (Tjosvold, Wong &
Feng Chen, 2014). The act of comprising is generally believed to be a positive measure for the
business leaders to stay in the hunt for the betterment in all sorts. This is kind of maturity and