Constitutional Law: Model for Institutional Reform in Kingdom of Shangri-La

Constitutional law

Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Summary of the findings............................................................................................................3
History and culture.....................................................................................................................4
Separation of powers..................................................................................................................4
Federal system............................................................................................................................6
Representative democracy and responsible government...........................................................7
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................7
References..................................................................................................................................8

Introduction
The model relating to the institutional reform with regard to the administration of the
Kingdom of Shangri-La would be based on the democratization to a further extent as far as
the application of the aspect pertinent to the Constitution of Australia is concerned. It would
help in the carrying out of affairs on a daily basis for the Kingdom of Shangri-La in a fair and
equal manner without any kind of major discrimination or exploitation of resources by the
company which has been permitted to carry out business activities by Rani Plantagenet
(Barendt, 2017).
Summary of the findings
The facts of the case imply that the status in relation to the community of Shong is
similar to that of the indigenous people in Australia; the application of the proposed model
would help in the wider participation of the community of Shong in the mainstream society
of the Kingdom of Shangri-La. Referendums with regard to the amendments of the
Constitution of Australia have played in important role in the recognition of the rights of the
indigenous people as far as their participation and representation in the mainstream society is
concerned (Michaels, 2015). As a result, it is imperative that the implementation of the
proposed model would help in the guaranteeing of the rights of the Shong as far as their
representation in a fair and equal manner is concerned with regard to the modus operandi of
the Kingdom of Shangri-La in an effective and efficient manner without any kind of major
political instability. It would help in the securing of the rights of the community of Shong
thereby ensuring that they are not subject to derogatory treatment in the future.
In the case of Mabo v Queensland (No.1), it was prayed by the plaintiffs that the
Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act of 1985 which implied the abolition of the native
tiltes pertaining to land rights is to be declared invalid as it is in contrary to the Racial
Discrimination Act of 1975. In this case, it was held by the High Court of Australia that the
Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act of 1985 as not valid as it is in gross contravention
of the Racial Discrimination Act of 1975 taking account of Section 109 of the Constitution of
Australia which implies supremacy of the federal parliament.
In the case of Mabo v Queensland (No.2), it was prayed by the plaintiffs that the
ownership, possession and occupancy of the land must be guaranteed as they are the