Types of Economic Systems and their Resource Allocation
Verified
Added on  2023/01/11
|12
|3597
|61
AI Summary
This document discusses the different types of economic systems and how they allocate resources. It covers mixed, free market, and command economies with examples.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Task 2 a.The different types of economic system and the ways by which they allocate their resources are as follows: Mixed economic system- Mixed economies are mostly accompanied by a distinct private sector where the resources are mainly allocated by the market forces, for instance the grocery sector in the UK economy. As stated by Chiang and Chen (2016) mixed economies are also accompanied by distinct public sectors, where the resources are mainly allocated by the government of the country such as defence, police and fire services. In majority of the sectors belonging to the mixed economies, the resources are mainly allocated by a combination of markets and planning such as healthcare which possesses both public and private possessions.Examples of mixed economic system are USA and France. Free markets- The markets which facilitates mutually beneficial exchange between the producers and consumers of the market and the system which rely on the market in order to solve various economic problems is termed as free market economy. In case of a free market economy, the resources are allocated by the interaction between the free and self-directed market forces which means that what to produce is determined by the customers in the market, how to produce is accordingly determined by the producers in the market and who purchases the product is determined by the purchasing power of the customers in the market.Examples of free market economies are Hong Kong and Singapore. Command economy- One of the ways to solve economic problems of a country or a particular government is allocation of scarce resources by the government of the country or by an agency which is appointed by the government of the country. As stated by Huggins, Morgan and Williams (2015) the allocation of resources by the government of a country or by a government appointed agency is termed as central planning and the economies or countries which follow the policy of central planning is termed as command economies in which the government direct or command resources in order to be used in particular ways.Examples of command economy are North Korea and Cuba.
b.As stated by Singh and Rao (2018) fiscal policy helps in determining the rules and regulations with respect to the nature and extent of taxation and expenditure by the government. The limit of tax collection and government expenditure in different sectors majorly impacts the position of profit of business organizations. As opined by Haldane (2018) monetary policy helps in influencing the extent of money supply in an economy. Depending on the need of a country in order to boost or control inflation, the government of that country make modifications accordingly in the monetary policy of the country and accordingly the changes in the monetary policy impacts both the availability of and the cost of fund for the business organizations. The monetary policy adopted by the government of a country also helps in influencing the value of the national currency of the country in the international market and the impacting profit positons of the company which operates in the global markets. The organization which is selected in the current report is Primark, which is one of the largest retail chains of UK. As opined by Vasilyev et al.(2017) in order to carry out their business activities and day to day operations, the company needs to abide by the competition policy of UK and the other regulatory mechanism which are place in UK. In order to compete in the market, Primark needs to abide by the Competition policy in UK which is based on the Competition Act 1998, Enterprise Bill Act 2002, Office of Fair Trading and the Competition Commission. Primark also needs to abide by the regulatory reforms which are in place in the UK market such as Companies Act 2006, the regional policy, the industrial policy, enterprise strategy, training and skills policy, employment policy, anti-discrimination laws work place health and safety laws etc. in order to carry out their business activities. c.Market structure is defined as the number of buyers and sellers in a market. The different types of market structure and their determination of pricing and output decisions are as follows: Perfect Competition- As stated by Reimers, Guo and Li (2018) perfect competition is defined as the market structure where there are multiple sellers of the same product and the determination of the price and the output decisions of the products depend on the demand of the product in the market. In case of a competitive market it is observed that the buyers of a product determine the
price of a product or service while the firms determine the output decisions in comparison to the demand of the product as every firm focuses on offering products at lower prices in order to increase their market share.For instance the closest example of nearly competitive market isthe agricultural market which is accompanied by large number of buyers and sellers. Source- cliffsnote.com (2019) Monopoly- In a monopoly market structure, there is a single firm which is present in the market and they are responsible for providing products and services to the customers. As opined by Gainullina (2016) in a monopolistic market structure, the sole provider of the product and service in the market determine the price and output decision regarding their products. In this type of market structure, the firm can charge whatever price from the customers and they are bound to pay it as they do not have any other choices. In this type of market structure, the firm focuses on producing its product with full capacity in order to fulfil customer demands and to earn more profit and market share.For example providers of water, natural gas and electricity are perfect examples of monopolistic market. Oligopoly- The market structure which is dominated by few large sellers of the same product is termed as oligopoly market structure and the sellers have some control over the prices of the product as they set an ongoing rate for their product. As opined by Feess and Paust (2015) in
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
oligopoly market structure it is observed that all the sellers offers the product at nearly the same price and it depends on the customers regarding the selection of the sellers and therefore sellers belonging to this market structure depend on advertisement for attracting their customers. In this market structure, the output decision is taken by the firms depending on the customer demand of the products.For instance the video game consoles market is an oligopoly market which is mainly dominated by Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo. The different types of market forces and how they shape organizational responses are as follows: Demand- As opined by Zidan (2015) the demand for a product can either increase or decrease for an organization and business organization needs to respond to both the situation. In case of increase in demand of the product, the company looks to produce more quantity of the product by hiring additional workers and in case of decrease of product demand there will be decrease of cash in-flow for the company which forces organizations to cut operational costs such as by cutting job of the employees.For instance Xiaomi required increasing their mobile phone production in India as a result of the increased demand of the mobile phones of the company. Supply- Similar to demand, the supply of a product can either increase or decrease for a business organization and they need to take responses according to it. As stated by Wiggan (2018) when there is an increase in the supply of products the demand of the product will decrease whereas in case of decrease in supply of the product, the demand of the product will increase and in such cases business organizations respond by producing their products based on the demand so that they do not have to face issues such as increased supply or supply shortage.For instance, Apple manufactures and supplies their products in the market based on the demand of the products of the company in the market.
Source- marketbusinessnews.com (2019) Employees- The employees of an organization is a vital market force which have the capability to change the behaviour of an organization. If the government of a country announces minimum wages for the workers and therefore business organizations must pay their worker with the minimum wages otherwise they will experience increased employee turnover and can also face legal proceedings against them.For instance Amazon decided to increase the salary of the workers of the company to $15 per hour as a result of increased government pressure and a tight labour market condition. Customers- The customers of the company are considered as the most important market force which shapes organizational responses as the success and failure of a product or service is dependent on the acceptance of products or services by the customers and therefore in order to make their product acceptable to their customers, business organizations must focus on designing theirproductsandserviceswhichsatisfiescustomerexpectations.For instance,Walmart improved their online and e-commerce platform as a result of increasing customer preference towards online shopping. Suppliers- As stated by Fan and Zhu (2014) the suppliers of a business organization are also a major force which has the capability to change the behaviour of an organization. The increase in the price of the raw materials by the suppliers tends to increase the prices of the product. If the products of a company are price elastic in nature, therefore the change of price will increase the demand of the product, and therefore the firm needs to negotiate with their existing suppliers or
switch to new suppliers.For instance GT advanced technologies, one of the major suppliers of Apple, filed for bankruptcy as Apple refused them to bail them out of danger as the supplies of the company did not meet the expectation of Apple. d.The business and cultural environment of UK shapes the behaviour and responses of Primark in the following ways: Political- The political environment of UK affects the behaviour and responses of Primark as the strategies and policies of the company are developed in accordance with the policies adopted by the UK government. Economic-AsopinedbyKrajnakova,NavickasandKontautiene(2018)theeconomic environment of UK affects the behaviour and responses of Primark as the pricing policies of the products and services of the company are determined based on the purchasing power of the customers. Socio-cultural- As opined by Kukovec, Mulej and Žižek (2018) the socio-cultural environment of UK affects the behaviour and responses of Primark as the design of the products are determined by the taste of the customers and the purchase preference of the customers. Technological- The technological environment of UK affects the behaviour and responses of Primark as the rate of technological advancement in UK determines the research and design of the products and the marketing of the products. Environmental- The ecological environment of UK affects the behaviour and responses of Primark as the environmental policies of the country helps in determining the sustainability strategy to be adopted by the company. Legal- As stated by Zirra (2015) the legal environment of UK affects the behaviour and responses of Primark as the various legal and regulatory frameworks adopted by the government of UK helps in determining various policies of the company such as training and recruitment policy, anti-discrimination policy, workplace equality policy and work place health and safety policy.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Task 3 UK is being positioned as the fourth most open economy in the world. The significance of international trade to the business organizations of UK are as follows: ï‚·It helps in the innovation of business products and services belonging to the UK economy. ï‚·Internationaltradeenablestechnologicalimprovementswhichhelpinlowering transportation and communication costs in UK. ï‚·International trade enables the business organizations of UK to build a larger network in terms of customers, suppliers, employees and other stakeholders. ï‚·It helps in the transfer of intellectual assets, ideas, skills and tactic knowledge to the UK business organizations ï‚·As opined by Engelmann (2014) it helps in creating employment opportunities, facilitates better training processes and improved skills and knowledge of the employees. ï‚·It helps in increasing competition which helps in enhancing the products of the company and enhances the value of the product to the customers. ï‚·International trade provides an opportunity for the business organizations of UK to expand and outsource their products which enables them to reach to a wider audience. The impact of global factors on UK business organizations are as follows: The various factors have a bearing on the activities of multi-national organizations such as Primark which not only operates domestically but also operates internationally and those factors are termed as global factors. Many of the companies which operate in UK conduct their business in other locations, where the labour costs are low and through international trade, which helps in boosting the economy of UK. As a result of the good reputation of UK in the world due to its application of advanced technology and a leading manufacturer of a variety of products, the UK based companies gets an opportunity to expand their business operations globally. According to Harris and Moffat (2015) the WTO has vital concerns regarding matters related to trade and exchange of goods and services among various countries of the world and ensuring global actions of organizations in an effective manner. The UK government contributes greatly to the liberalization of trade and exchange by formulating laws and policies which help in focusing on the global growth of UK based companies. According to Krasnozhon,Simpson and Block
(2015) the Protectionism policy adopted by the government of UK restricts the import of certain items for ensuring healthy competition of the goods and services produced in UK. Therefore the government of UK by the application of various taxes and tariffs restricts imports in certain areas. The BRICS countries are considered as the one of the fastest developing economies in the world which poses significant threat to the UK economy and the UK based organizations. Task 4 The European Union or the EU has various rules and policies which must be followed by various organizations conducting their business activities in UK and other member countries. As Primark operates in multiple countries which are members of the EU, and therefore it must follow the regulations and policies of EU. One of the most important policies of EU, which must be followed by companies operating in EU countries, is conducting all dealings between the organizations and its subsidiary based at the member countries in Euro currency by the European Money Transfer Union which strengthens the Euro currency. As stated by Hatzigeorgiou and Lodefalk (2016) the various EU policies have an impact on the business activities of the organizations in UK which affects the operations of companies in various areas such as employment, training and development, selection and recruitment, spending, taxes levied, subsidiaries, international trade etc. The countries which belong to the EU are permitted to do free trade with other member countries while the government of those countries remain responsible for monitoring the business activities as per the policies of EU. Therefore all UK based organizations such as Primark must comply with the rules and regulations of EU in order to avoid disciplinary actions for violating the rules and regulations.
References Chiang, T. C., and Chen, X. (2016). Stock returns and economic fundamentals in an emerging market: An empirical investigation of domestic and global market forces.International Review ofEconomics&Finance,43,107.Availableat https://search.proquest.com/docview/1789513960?accountid=30552 Cliffsnote.com(2019)DemandinaperfectlycompetitivemarketAvailable at-https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/economics/perfect-competition/demand-in-a- perfectly-competitive-marketAccessed as on 01/04/2019 Engelmann, S. (2014). International trade, technological change and wage inequality in the UK economy.Empirica,41(2), 223-246. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10663-013-9209-z Fan, D., and Zhu, C. J. (2014). How do chinese multinationals perceive factors affecting the integration-responsiveness framework?International Journal of Emerging Markets,9(2), 181- 204. Available athttps://search.proquest.com/docview/1520636114?accountid=30552 Feess,E.,andPaust,M.(2015).Implementingefficientmarketstructures:Theroleof information transmission.Finanz - Archiv : Zeitschrift Für Das Gesamte Finanzwesen,71(2), 240-277. Available athttps://search.proquest.com/docview/1690432839?accountid=30552 Gainullina,Y.R.(2016).FORMATIONOFINNOVATIVEAPPROACHESTOTHE DESIGNING OF A THREE-PRONGED CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION.Journal of Internet Banking andCommerce,21,1-19.Availableathttps://search.proquest.com/docview/1855296994? accountid=30552 Haldane, A. G. (2018). How monetary policy affects your gross domestic product.The Australian Economic Review,51(3), 309-335. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12292 Harris, R., and Moffat, J. (2015). The impact of exporting and importing goods and services on productivityintheUK.TheWorldEconomy,38(11),1781. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/twec.12292
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Hatzigeorgiou, A., and Lodefalk, M. (2016). The brexit trade disruption revisited.The Estey CentreJournalofInternationalLawandTradePolicy,17(1),41-58.Availableat https://search.proquest.com/docview/1965063434?accountid=30552 Huggins, R., Morgan, B., and Williams, N. (2015). Regional entrepreneurship and the evolution of public policy and governance.Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,22(3), 473-511. Available athttps://search.proquest.com/docview/1702051811?accountid=30552 Krajnakova, E., Navickas, V., and Kontautiene, R. (2018). Effect of macroeconomic business environment on the development of corporate social responsibility in baltic countries and slovakia.OeconomiaCopernicana,9(3),477-489,489A-489C. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.024 Krasnozhon, L. A., Simpson, D., and Block, W. E. (2015). FAIR TRADE: ITS REAL IMPACT ON THE WORKING POOR.The Review of Social and Economic Issues,1(2), 5-28. Available athttps://search.proquest.com/docview/1678730123?accountid=30552 Kukovec, D., Mulej, M., and Žižek, S. Š. (2018). Professional languages alone do not suffice for successful and socially responsible internal communication between different cultures.Nase Gospodarstvo : NG,64(3), 47-55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2018-0017 Marketbusinessnews.com(2019)WhataremarketforcesAvailable at-https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/market-forces/Accessed as on 01/04/2019 Reimers, K., Guo, X., and Li, M. (2018). Beyond markets, hierarchies, and hybrids: An institutionalperspectiveonIT-enabledtwo-sidedmarkets.ElectronicMarkets,,1-19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0319-0 Singh, S. K., and Rao, D. T. (2018). IS MONETARY POLICY SYMMETRICAL IN ITS EFFECT ON SECTORAL OUTPUT?Economics, Management and Financial Markets,13(1), 11-31. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22381/EMFM13120181 Vasilyev, E. P., Filimonenko, I. V., Likhacheva, T. P., and Rouiga, I. R. (2017). The rationale for increasing the theoretical understanding on the basic concepts of economic theory.European
ResearchStudies,20(4),386-407.Availableat https://search.proquest.com/docview/1968019359?accountid=30552 Wiggan, J. (2018). Policy boostering the social impact investment market in the UK.Journal of Social Policy,47(4), 721-738. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000089 Zidan, Z. H. M. (2015).Environmental factors affecting on creativity level of the egyptian business organizations. London: The Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM). Available athttps://search.proquest.com/docview/1757281552?accountid=30552 Zirra,A.(2015).RECENTDEVELOPMENTSOFINTERNATIONALBUSINESS ENVIRONMENT.RomanianEconomicandBusinessReview,10(4),69-80.Availableat https://search.proquest.com/docview/1792214861?accountid=30552