logo

Contract Law Assignment - Astley v Austrust Limited

6 Pages922 Words164 Views
   

Added on  2020-12-09

Contract Law Assignment - Astley v Austrust Limited

   Added on 2020-12-09

ShareRelated Documents
Contract Law
Contract Law Assignment - Astley v Austrust Limited_1
Table of ContentsMAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................1ANALYSIS OF ISSUE...................................................................................................................1CASE LAWS...................................................................................................................................2CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................2REFERENCES................................................................................................................................4
Contract Law Assignment - Astley v Austrust Limited_2
MAIN BODYFacts related with case: in this case Pia a fitness coach went for Ski trip and upon reaching theski center she signed a form without reading it and submitted the fees.Formation of contractAs per provision of contract law a contract is formed when parties intent to be legallybound by their promises and have agreed clearly on term promises made by them. For a contractto be their there are certain requirements that must be fulfilled that are: offer, acceptance andconsideration. Parties to contract must agree on sane terms than valid contract is formed. Exclusion clause: As per Australian contract law an exclusion clause term in contract which limits theliability of beach under the contractual agreement (Exclusion Clauses. 2018). This is generallymentioned on the bills and or in cautionary language and defied that in case of breach the partycan not be held liable for the same. This is inserted to protect oneself from thing that might gowrong within a contract.Negligence:Duty of careDivision 2As per law of negligence ski center owes a duty of care toward each and every personwho cones to there center for taking ski trip. It is their duty to well inform them about the anyrisk though it is minor but still need to be informed to them in order to make them vigilant aboutthe trip they are going to undertake.Duty of warn risk: Section 10A person who owes a duty of care to another person gives a warning and otherinformation to the later person in respect of any risk involved satisfy duty of care in the formerperson takes reasonable care in giving that warning (Law of negligence and limitation ofliability Act, 2008). ANALYSIS OF ISSUEThe issues to be answered in this case are:Whether there was a valid contract between Pia and Ski center?Does the notice falls under exclusion clause? Does their was negligence on behalf of the Ski center? 1
Contract Law Assignment - Astley v Austrust Limited_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Validity and Payment in Contract Law
|6
|1492
|74

Newman Tours Ltd v Ranier Investments Ltd
|6
|649
|49

Business Law Assignment - Contract Formation, Consumer Law and Implied Terms
|8
|2248
|155

Business Law Legal Analysis 2017
|13
|3450
|101

Liability of Fun Parks Adventureland under Negligence Principles
|5
|1293
|5

Applying Legal Principles in Contract and Consumer Law
|11
|4140
|96