COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) Checklist
Verified
Added on 2023/06/04
|2
|717
|53
AI Summary
This checklist provides guidance on reporting qualitative research. It includes items related to research team and reflexivity, study design, participant selection, data collection, analysis and findings. Each item has guide questions and authors must report the page number where they consider each item in their manuscript.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) Checklist A checklist of items that should be included in reports of qualitative research. You must report the page number in your manuscript where you consider each of the items listed in this checklist. If you have not included this information, either revise your manuscript accordingly before submitting or note N/A. TopicItem No.Guide Questions/DescriptionReported on Page No. Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity Personal characteristics Interviewer/facilitator1Which author/s conducted the interview or focus group? Credentials2What were the researcher’s credentials? E.g. PhD, MD Occupation3What was their occupation at the time of the study? Gender4Was the researcher male or female? Experience and training5What experience or training did the researcher have? Relationship with participants Relationship established6Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? Participant knowledge of the interviewer 7What did the participants know about the researcher? e.g. personal goals, reasons for doing the research Interviewer characteristics8What characteristics were reported about the inter viewer/facilitator? e.g. Bias, assumptions, reasons and interests in the research topic Domain 2: Study design Theoretical framework Methodological orientation and Theory 9What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? e.g. grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis Participant selection Sampling10How were participants selected? e.g. purposive, convenience, consecutive, snowball Method of approach11How were participants approached? e.g. face-to-face, telephone, mail, email Sample size12How many participants were in the study? Non-participation13How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? Setting Setting of data collection14Where was the data collected? e.g. home, clinic, workplace Presence of non- participants 15Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? Description of sample16What are the important characteristics of the sample? e.g. demographic data, date Data collection Interview guide17Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? Repeat interviews18Were repeat inter views carried out? If yes, how many? Audio/visual recording19Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? Field notes20Were field notes made during and/or after the inter view or focus group? Duration21What was the duration of the inter views or focus group? Data saturation22Was data saturation discussed? Transcripts returned23Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
TopicItem No.Guide Questions/DescriptionReported on Page No. correction? Domain 3: analysis and findings Data analysis Number of data coders24How many data coders coded the data? Description of the coding tree 25Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? Derivation of themes26Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? Software27What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? Participant checking28Did participants provide feedback on the findings? Reporting Quotations presented29Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? e.g. participant number Data and findings consistent30Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? Clarity of major themes31Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? Clarity of minor themes32Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? Developed from: Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007. Volume 19, Number 6: pp. 349 – 357 Once you have completed this checklist, please save a copy and upload it as part of your submission. DO NOTinclude this checklist as part of the main manuscript document. It must be uploaded as a separatefile.