Corporate and Financial Accounting: A Study on AASB in IFRS Process and Debt to Equity Analysis of Listed Companies
Verified
Added on 2023/06/08
|14
|3562
|318
AI Summary
This report analyzes the effectiveness of AASB in IFRS process and debt to equity position of Woolworths, Wesfarmers, Myer Holdings, and JB Hi Fi. It also discusses the necessity of regulation in financial accounting and reporting.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Corporate and Financial Accounting 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Executive summery In present competitive environment, accounting information plays important role for business performance and economic outlooks. In present world, businesses are mostly dependent on the financial information and build their strategic as per available information. The report focused on the effectiveness of the AASB in the IFRS process, debt to equity analysis of Woolworths limited, Wesfarmers Ltd, Myer Holdings Ltd and JB Hi Fi Ltd. The discussion shows that regulation helps the business in preventing the potential failure of the market. AASB provides additional guidelines or the supporting commentary which are not there in the IASB. All of these help in the following AASB standard without contradicting the IFRS standards.The position of debt and equity for the business shows that Wesfarmers Ltd always remained on the less risky side of the industry by sacrificing growth opportunity to some extent. JB Hi Fi Ltd’s unpredictable data could be a cause of concern for the wrong strategy of the business. 2
Table of Contents Executive summery....................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................4 Corporate regulation...................................................................................................................4 The necessity of regulation in the financial reporting and accounting..................................4 Accounting standard setting.......................................................................................................5 The IFRS and the AASB’s taking part in this process of global accounting.........................5 Owner’s equity...........................................................................................................................8 Item of equity and the changing pattern of it.........................................................................8 Position of debt to equity analysis.........................................................................................9 Conclusion................................................................................................................................11 Reference..................................................................................................................................12 3
Introduction The accounting or the financial information has become highly important for the international economic outlook. In the current world economic environment the businesses are relying more and more on the financial system that is based on the capital market. Therefore the timely, accurate and proper standard based financial information disclosure has become highly important for the businesses. Considering this the current report would investigate the requirement of regulation for the financial accounting and reporting process, the role of AASB in the IFRS processes, the debt and equity position analysis of four listed public company. This approach would provide a theoretical and practical overview of the corporate and financial accounting process. Corporate regulation The necessity of regulation in the financial reporting and accounting The necessity of regulation in the financial accounting and the reporting process has many justifications but the free market approach state other way. As per this free market approach the financial information is treated as like the economic assets. This information therefore would have a natural demand and the supply side would be met by the companies. This would lead to a natural process of exchange. Therefore this approach would produce the appropriateamountofinformationforthedifferentstakeholdersandtheirrelevant information as per the demand supply point of view would not be produced (Botzem, 2012).Under this approach of accounting any financial information disclosure the manager would have the voluntary right to disclose the information. As per this approach the manager would have the motivation to disclose proper information to keep the company’s resource baseintact.ThetheoreticalmodelofAgencytheorywouldbeusefulforthebetter understanding development Agency theory- This theory state that different party based contractual relationship intersects in the company’s activity. On the other hand stakeholders have their personal interest. The economic perspective of the agency theory gives rise to the concept of agency and principle (Ballwieseret al.,2012). The principles are the owner and they select the administrator or the agent to manage the business on behalf of them. But at the time of operation different psychological and economic goal are followed by the manager and that may in turn be in 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
conflict with the profit maximisation goals of the owner. This conflict is reduced by aligning the goals or their monitoring approach. The monitoring process increases cost for the owners which in turn would reduce the remuneration for the manger. Therefore as per this theory the manager would try to provide the reliable information to improve their evaluation and hence theremuneration.Thiswouldreducethemonitoringcostandimprovereliabilityof accounting and financial information. This context can be taken to the wider market context and there the quality work of the manager would important for the potential market investors (Sorrentino, Cossu, , and Smarra, 2015).Under the limited resource base the manager would be motivated to disclose the financial and accounting information properly to operate successfully in the market. Accepting all of the above logic, still it can is possible that all the information are not disclosed properly by the manager. Under this circumstances that have the chance of privet informationtrade (Sorrentino, Cossu, , and Smarra,2015).Thereforethe counter argument of the voluntary disclosure by the manager would be as follows. The regulation would help in preventing the potential failure of the market. The regulation would be the level playing field guarantee and facilitating instrument for the social choice. Here the argument is that certain data of accounting process is not the ordinary type of economic asset and therefore the efficient allocation, balances supply approach of the free market would fail and lead to market failure. The feature of the accounting and financial information are not similar to that of the ordinary market good. Therefore the justification of the ‘underproduction’ in this context is not there and the regulatory approach can only influence the companies to produce some minimum information for different stakeholders (Botzem, 2012). The drawback and the potential failure of the free market approach based voluntary manager’s accounting information disclosure can be overcomes through the well developed regulatory approach of information disclosure but in this context increasing cost of this process would have to be borne by the company. 5
Accounting standard setting The IFRS and the AASB’s taking part in this process of global accounting Main approach that is followed by the AASB in the IFRS is the content and wording adoption from the IASB’s IFRS standard. The development of AASB is done as the IASB’s Australian equivalence(Chalmers, Clinch, and Godfrey, 2011). Thereforethe adopted words are changed following the accommodation requirements of the Australian legislative processes and environment. IFRS is highly focused to be applied for the for-profit business entities. Therefore the AASB’s new text inclusion is based on the additional or different requirements of the not-for-profit organisations. There is no complication or confusion of these regulations forthefor-profitbusinessentity(Cotter,Tarca,andWee,2012).Butthenot-for-profit organisation would not be able to comply with the IASB standards when it is complying with the AASB standard because of the different approach of AASB for dealing with the not-for- profit organisation. 6
[Source: Aasb.gov.au, 2018] The additional disclosure and the optional treatment approach is another part of AASB while taking part in the IFRS. There are occasions when the AASB allows the entity to follow only one optional treatment from the IASB but there are cases when AASB ask for additional disclosure (Aasb.gov.au, 2018).This aspect of AASB does not prohibit any entity to comply with the IASB standards mentioned in the IFRS. AASB provides additional guidelines or the supporting commentary which are not there in the IASB. All of these help in the AASB standard following without contradicting the IFRS standards (Cheung, Evans, and Wright, 2008). The reason of these guidance inclusions was based on the requirement of the Australian environment. ‘Definition of the reporting entity’ of the SAC1 is not present in the IASB or does not have any equivalence also. This concept is present in the GAAP of Australia. Then ‘objective of general purpose financial reporting’ of SAC2 is also there in the AASB(Chua, Cheong, and 7
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Gould, 2012).All of these are applicable for the matters that are only in the AASB but this approach are not in conflict with the disclosure, measurement and recognition of the standards terms. There are some other AASB standards like the standards for the materiality which are not so different from the IFRS but more comprehensive in nature (Cheunget al.,2008). All of these factors do not change the AASB’s approach of regulation much from the IASB. In this process of taking part some other aspect are followed to support other issues. The technical issues in this process addressed differently. IFRS or the IASB mainly identifies the technical issues of this process. Then those issues would be taken from the work program of IFRS into the work program of AASB. The issue-by-issue approach is followed in a non- substantive and substantive manner by the AASB (Aasb.gov.au, 2018).Then there could be other issues which are technical nature identified by the board member of AASB. These issues which are for-profit organisations’ are then referred to IFRS or the IASB. This is the consolidation process of technical issue identified by AASB. Other stakeholder can also identify the issues and approach to AASB for advice. The project proposal of the identified issue is prepared by the AASB to be included in their agenda to be decided by the board of AASB (Chua, Cheong, and Gould, 2012).After the consolidation process based on the research, wonder stakeholderconsultation,the pronouncementis issued. The financial implementation of the standard is done by the AASB of the proposed internal changes. The IFRS standards based on the principle and not on the clear rule based approaches. This approach gives lot of flexibility for the member country business entities to adopt the standard in their accounting process but have chance of window dressing than honest representation of theinformation (Morris, Gray, Pickering and Aisbitt, 2013).Moreover the standards of IFRS are not made compulsory for IASB member countries. The reason of this on compulsory approach is the value based adoption of the process rather than creation of an artificial uniformity of accounting process. The business and business environment varies in different countries. This wide variety may not suite the standard to different countries and because of that reason the standard is not made compulsory for the members(Morris, Gray,Pickering, and Aisbitt, 2013).But it is though that the standard would be useful in the globalised business context and the system has some direct benefit like the cheaper capital, compatibility benefit for the investors, lower cost of accounting and so on. In a non compulsory more the adoption would happen on the basis of these values. 8
Owner’s equity Item of equity and the changing pattern of it As studies conducted by Khan, (2015), said that equity also referred as the net assets, the organization ownership’s claim to organization assists after liabilities of organization is paid off. In other word, equity of an organization is computed by subtracting organization liabilities from organization assets. In order to successfully evaluated and analyzed the performance of the organization based on equity, Woolworths limited, Wesfarmers Ltd, Myer Holdings Ltd and JB Hi Fi Ltd are selected. All organizations are based on the retail sectors and performing well in Australia market and also listed in Australian Exchange securities Exchange. While comparing the equity performance of an organization Wesfarmers, it is seen that shareholders’ equity of the organization is increased by 4.3% from $22,949 million to $23,941 million from 2015 to 2016.In addition to this, it can be observed that reserve performance of the business is increased about 14% from FY2016 to FY2017, but in FY2016/15 and FY2015/14 it performance is decreased about 27% and 45% respectively. In addition to this, organization performance in regards to retained earnings is increased by 73% and issued capital is decreased by 3%. While comparing these performances with Woolworth limited then it is observed that organization performance in contributed equity, reserves, retain earnings is deceased fromFY2016/17 to FY2016/15. On the other hand, it is seen that Myer holding lit performance in terms of reserves and retained earnings is deceased by 22% and 9% [retained earnings (FY2016/17; $342.146m, FY2016/14; $ 49.3m; FY2016/14; $ 56.521m)].Therefore from the findings and analysis it can be seen that, performance of the organization JB Hi Fi Ltd is well as the company can achieve positive trends in FY2016/17 as compared to other organization in same sectors. In addition to this, performance of the organization JB Hi Fi Ltd in context to retained earnings is increased by 50%, 54% and 16% from period of 2014 to 2017.From the findings and analysis, it can be said that positive trend in retained earnings of the organization JB Hi Fi Ltd is due to positive net earnings in same time period. Position of debt to equity analysis The position of debt and equity for the business needs to be constantly assessed to manage the risk of doing business. Debt is an obligation for the company, whereas the equity is also a liability for the business but is not mandatory for the business to be redeemed. Therefore debt 9
is risky for the business. This business position can be understood from the debt to equity ratio of the business(Delen, Kuzey, and Uyar, 2013).The ratio is calculated by dividing total liability by total equity. This is the leveraging position identification for the organisation. The analysis of this ratio can be done through multiple year analysis of the same company and also for the similar industry companies. In the table below the debt to equity ratio of different company is shown for four years of four companies. In case ofWoolworths limited the ratio increased from 2014 to 2016 and crossed the halfway market but again dropped significantly in 2017 to 0.32. Therefore the business continues to increase their debt risk to fund their growth driving activity but a pragmatic approach is taken in the2017 (Liang, Lu,Tsai, and Shih, 2016).For Wesfarmers Ltd the trend is similar but the ratio is lower than Woolworths limited. The cases of Myer Holdings Ltd also have the higher ratio and growing trend like the Woolworths limited. There had much more strict corrective measure in 2017 where the ratio dropped from .51 to .13. This aspect also means a sudden drop in the business or the economic activity in the organisation. Considering first three organisations it can be said that the growth prospects of the retail business in the 2017 were not as bullish as of the previous three years(Liang, Lu, Tsai, and Shih, 2016).The case of JB Hi Fi Ltd is somewhat different. The ratio is highly fluctuating in nature. In the 2017 the ratio reached highest of 0.66 for the company and the industry. The industry average considering the past four years of data is around 0.39. Therefore Wesfarmers Ltd always remained on the less risky side of the industry by sacrificing growth opportunity to someextent (Delen, Kuzey, and Uyar, 2013). JBHi Fi Ltd’s unpredictable data could be a cause of concern for the wrong strategy of the business. When the business is becoming risky the investor is taking more risk. Therefore the investor can expect better return from the stock. Debt to equity ratios2014201520162017 Woolworths limited0.430.440.520.32 Wesfarmers Ltd0.20.260.320.23 Myer Holdings0.470.470.510.13 10
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Ltd JB Hi Fi Ltd0.610.410.270.66 Graph representation of Comparative analysis of debt to equity ratios 2014201520162014 0.430.44 0.52 0.320000000000 001 0.20.26 0.320000000000 001 0.23 0.470.470.51 0.13 0.610000000000 001 0.41 0.27 0.660000000000 002 comparative analysis of the debt and equity position woolworths limitedWesfarmers Ltd Myer Holdings LtdJB Hi Fi Ltd 11
Conclusion The financial and accounting information evaluation was able to provide proper insight for the corporate accounting process. The need for the regulatory approach and the analysis of AASB relation with IFRS provided the requirements of standardised approach of accounting. The company analysis is showing the approach of interpretation and usefulness of accounting and financial information for different stakeholder. 12
Reference AustralianAccountingStandardBoards(2018).Thestandard-settingprocess.[online] Availableat:https://www.aasb.gov.au/About-the-AASB/The-standard-setting- process.aspx [Accessed 13 Sep. 2018]. Ballwieser, W., Bamberg, G., Beckmann, M. J., Bester, H., Blickle, M., Ewert, R., ... and Gaynor, M. (2012).Agency theory, information, and incentives. Springer Science & Business Media. Botzem, S. (2012).The politics of accounting regulation: Organizing transnational standard setting in financial reporting. Edward Elgar Publishing. Chalmers, K., Clinch, G., and Godfrey, J. M. (2011). Changes in value relevance of accounting information upon IFRS adoption: Evidence from Australia.Australian Journal of Management,36(2), 151-173. Cheung, E., Evans, E., and Wright, S. (2008). The adoption of IFRS in Australia: The case of AASB 138 (IAS 38) Intangible Assets.Australian Accounting Review,18(3), 248- 256. Chua, Y. L., Cheong, C. S., and Gould, G. (2012). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on accounting quality: Evidence from Australia.Journal of International accounting research,11(1), 119-146. Cotter, J., Tarca, A., and Wee, M. (2012). IFRS adoption and analysts’ earnings forecasts: Australian evidence.Accounting & Finance,52(2), 395-419. Delen, D., Kuzey, C., and Uyar, A. (2013). Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach.Expert Systems with Applications,40(10), 3970- 3983. JbHi-FiAnnualreport(2017).Annualreport2017[online]Availableat: https://www.jbhifi.com.au/Documents/2017%20Annual%20Report.pdf [Accessed 13 Sep. 2018]. 13
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Khan, M. (2015). Accounting: Financial. In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Third Edition-5 Volume Set (pp. 1-6). Routledge. Liang, D., Lu, C. C., Tsai, C. F., and Shih, G. A. (2016). Financial ratios and corporate governance indicators in bankruptcy prediction: A comprehensive study.European Journal of Operational Research,252(2), 561-572. Morris, R. D., Gray, S. J., Pickering, J., and Aisbitt, S. (2013). Preparers' perceptions of the costsandbenefitsofIFRS:EvidencefromAustralia'simplementation experience.Accounting Horizons,28(1), 143-173. MyerAnnualreport(2017).Annualreport2017[online]Availableat: http://investor.myer.com.au/FormBuilder/_Resource/_module/dGngnzELxUikQxL5g b1cgA/file/Myer_Annual_Report_2017.pdf [Accessed 13 Sep. 2018]. Sorrentino,M.,Cossu,F.,andSmarra,M.(2015).The“Production”ofAccounting Information Between Regulatory and Free Market Approach: An (Eternally) Open Issue.Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing,11(1), 1-9. WesfarmersAnnualreport(2017).Annualreport2017[online]Availableat: https://www.wesfarmers.com.au/docs/default-source/reports/j000901- ar17_interactive_final.pdf?sfvrsn=4 [Accessed 13 Sep. 2018]. WoolworthsgroupAnnualreport(2017).Annualreport2017[online]Availableat: https://www.woolworthsgroup.com.au/icms_docs/188795_annual-report-2017.pdf [Accessed 13 Sep. 2018]. 14