Comparison of Corporate Governance Codes: Norway vs UAE
Verified
Added on 2023/05/29
|6
|1166
|84
AI Summary
This article compares the corporate governance codes of Norway and UAE, focusing on their features, code compliance, board structure, remuneration, board committees, board meetings, whistleblowing, transactions with related parties, external auditor, internal control, and other aspects.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & ETHICS1 FeaturesNorway Code of CG (wpstatic.idium.no, 2018)UAECode of CG(dfm.ae, 2016) Code Compliance “Comply or Explain” principle. Companies need to comply with code or they can explain the reason for choosing an alternative approach. The compliance officer is appointed to ensure compliance with provisions of lay by staff and the decisions and regulation issued pursuant and to internal procedures and policies of companies. Webpage for investor relation needs by be compliance regularly with international standards. Code SystemThe code system is for private and public limited companies. The code system is for public sharing company Structure of BOD The board structure is unitary for both public and private limited liability companies. Each member of the board needs to be appointed as director. Chief executive or any executive personnel cannot be a board of director’s member Formation of BOD shall be determined in articles of association of the company. Board of directors is elected by the general assembly by cumulative voting secretly. As per company organizational structure, the statement of the company’s director, the positions, details of salaries, appointment dates and bonuses to each member or any compensations are to be mentioned. Number of BOD There are no maximum numbers of directors, companies can decide on the minimum or a maximum number of directors that need to be mentioned in articles of association. Chairman is elected as the highest governing body. The general committee elects boards of directors. If the government of the company’s capital owns five percent, the same proportion may be appointed persons to the number of members of the board with a minimum of one member. Remuneration Remuneration of the board of directors should not be connected to the performance of the company and should not provide the option of share to board members. Any remuneration to normal director’s fees must be identified in the report annually. Remuneration paid to chairman must be resolute separately from other board members. The remuneration of each member must Remuneration of members of the board of directors and chairman is made up of not more than ten percent of the net profit of fiscal year. Remuneration to the auditors is fixed by the general assembly. Board of directors is also held responsible for the appointment of a permanent committee that is known as the remuneration committee, where
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & ETHICS2 be provided in the annual report. Board of directors prepares remuneration of executive personnel, which is specific, clear, and understandable. once a year, the meeting is conducted. Board Committees Board committees reflect structure for directing and managing companies that appreciably under the Norwegian model. Role of board committees includes preparing final decision by the complete board. Moreover, communicate material information to all members of the board. It is duties of non-executive board members to participate in board committees in the organization. Board Meetings Board meeting notice is to be provided in an appropriate manner and in advance necessarily. Board of directors deals all annual accounts and reports of directors are presented in a board meeting. These accounts need to be signed by all directors. The meeting of the board of directors is conducted four times in a year; the invitation needs to be in written form from Board’s chairman, which is to be sent at least one week before the mentioned date. WhistleblowingThe code does not disclose any code for an aspect of whistleblowing The code does not disclose any code for an aspect of whistleblowing Level of Disclosure and Transparency The security-trading act is imposed that restrict notification and obligations of disclosure on directors that have shares in listed companies. Disclosure of remuneration needs to done in annual accounts. Disclosure and transparency policy and its implementation are according to supervisory authorities’ requirements and legislation applicable. This includes periodic report disclosure, information to shareholders, use of the website to enhance transparency and disclosure.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & ETHICS3 Transactions with Related Parties Related party transaction is a transaction between the company and a director under this law.To make these transactions valid, it is essential to get this approved by company general meeting. The director’s duty also includes, that they do not participate in resolutions, where a related party of the director is considered as a financial interest or special person in the matter. A company should not accept any related party transaction, without Board of director’s consent, only in case if the transaction value is less than five percent of the capital of the company. External Auditor Auditing and auditors act is applicable to present a report to the audit committee on major characteristics of an audit of the previous accounting year. The audit committee establishes that has a duty to ensure coordination between internal control and external auditors under review of auditor’s assessment. Internal Control The responsibility of sound internal control and risk management system is of the board of directors, with relation to the company’s activity nature.The internal control system of companies needs to be at a minimum, address the company, and execution of financial reporting of Board of directors is responsible for establishing a department of internal control in order to follow up the compliance with regulations, applicable laws, resolutions, supervisory bodies’ requirements, internal policy, procedures, and regulation set by
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & ETHICS4 companies. Moreover, the board has to conduct an annual review, where most important aspect that is exposed to risk are identified and arrangements of internal control are done the board of directors. Other CG Aspects Many organizations are associated with this code, some of them are, Association of Private Pension Funds, Finance Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Accountants, Oslo Børs, Norwegian Mutual Fund Association. This code of corporate governance has been recently established in 2016
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & ETHICS5 References dfm.ae. (2016).The Chairman of Authority's Board of Directors' Resolution No. (7 R.M) of 2016 ConcerningtheStandardsofInstitutionalDisciplineandGovernanceofPublic ShareholdingCompanies.Retrievedfromdfm.ae:https://www.dfm.ae/docs/default- source/Rules/the-chairman-of-authority-s-board-of-directors-resolution-no-(7-r-m)-of- 2016-concerning-the-standards-of-institutional-discipline-and-governance-of-publish- shareholding-companies.pdf?sfvrsn=2 wpstatic.idium.no. (2018).The norwegian code of practice for corporate governance.Retrieved fromwpstatic.idium.no: https://wpstatic.idium.no/nues.no/2018/10/NUES_eng_web_okt2018.pdf