Corporate Governance: Ethical Theories, Fraud Triangle, CEO Roles and Responsibilities, Securities Fraud, and Agency Theory

This article discusses ethical theories, fraud triangle, CEO roles and responsibilities, securities fraud, and agency theory in corporate governance. It also explores the case of Martin Shkreli and his actions as a CEO. The article concludes with the importance of ethical codes of conduct and compliance monitoring to reduce corporate fraud.

Running head: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Answer 1:
Ethical theories can be referred to as the rules and principles determining the nature of
right and wrong in regard to the present situation. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that,
ethics can be referred to as the branch of philosophy that has been dealing with the principles of
morality and the standards defining right and wrong (Foreman-Peck & Hannah, 2015). In this
context, mention can be made about the existing ethical theories which can be categorized as-
 Individualism:
The theory of individualism emphasizes upon the needs of an individual before any other
person. In case of business scenario, it refers to the maximization of profits for the company and
its shareholders. The decisions on the part of the company will be such that it will be concerned
with the ones making profit (García-Sánchez, Rodríguez-Domínguez& Frías-Aceituno, 2015).
 Kantianism:
According to the theory of Kantianism, an individual should act rationally and in such
process shall motivate people to act rationally with due respect and motivation (Gottschalk,
2017). The theory emphasizes that in order to stay motivated one should promote goodwill and
be rational.
 Utilitarianism:
According to this theory, business enterprises should aim maximization of profit in the long
run by valuing the happiness of other individuals as well (Harrison & Ryder, 2016). This theory
states that if an action creates nuisance other than being beneficial; then it is considered to be
unethical.
 Virtue theory:
The concept of virtue ethics is such that it emphasizes upon the mind and character of an
individual whether he acted honestly or not (Katmon& Al Farooque, 2017). Virtues are the
characteristics that allows individual to perform ethically while vices are the ones that gives rise
to unethical behavior.

2CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Business ethics can be referred to as moral principles that have formed guidelines in which a
business operation usually takes place. These principles determine the actions on the part of an
individual involved in such business operation (Harrison & Ryder, 2016). Therefore, business
ethics can be defined as the study of business policies and practices that involves the subject-
matter of corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, fiduciary duties and insider
trading.
It is worthwhile to refer here that Martin Shkreli has subscribed to the theory of
individualism. This is because, according to the theory of individualism, Martin Shkreli acted for
maximizing the profit of the company. This is due to the reason that Martin Shkrelihas already
stated that, the business decision can be considered to be great if it proves to be beneficial for the
shareholders (Kusumaningtias et al., 2016). The action on the part Martin Shkreli can be
considered to be legal and ethical by the theory of individualism however; the profits were
earned by keeping the well being of the people at stake.
Answer 2:
The Fraud Triangle can be defined as the structural framework that has been designed for the
purpose of explaining the reason behind a decision on the part of a worker to commit fraud
related to workplace (Mangala & Kumari, 2015). The Fraud Triangle can create an effect on the
individual that can be categorized as-
 Pressure on the individual:
It forms a motivation behind the crime which can be either personal issues or financial
pressure. However, the nature of the pressure is such that it is unsolvable, orthodox and cannot
be shared with others.
 The opportunity to commit crime:
In this stage, there is an opportunity on the part of the individual to defraud the organization.
In such process, the individual can sense a clear course of action depending upon which they can
abuse their position.
Rationalizing the crime:

3CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In the final stage, the ability on the part of the individual to rationalize the crime is
measured. In this stage, it is required on the part of the individual to justify the crime according
to their external and internal situations (O’Connell, 2015).
It is worthwhile to refer here that, in the present case study; Martin Shkreli fell into the
second stage of the fraud triangle because he had an opportunity to defraud the organization in
which he was acting as a CEO. However, he chooses to abuse his position as a CEO by raising
the price of that particular drug.
White collar crime can be defined as the crime committed on the part of an individual
belonging to the high social status in the organization. White-collar crime is concerned with
financial fraud that is being committed by directors and senior executives of the company.
Therefore, white-collar crime can be defined as a non-violent crime committed in order to gain
financial stability (Raiborn et al., 2017).
Securities fraud can be defined as the deceptive and fraudulent activities that usually
involve stock or commodities markets (Sadasivam et al., 2016). Securities fraud generally occurs
when a false statement is made regarding an organization by an individual and the financial
decisions are made relying upon such false statements.
It is noteworthy to mention here that, Martin Shkreli has committed fraud by lifting the
prices of specific drugs which can cure are diseases. As a result of it harmed the general
community as a whole. However, Nick Leeson has committed the act of money laundering
which is a serious crime.
Answer 3:
The CEO is the decision-maker of the company and the executives are answerable to
him. Various roles and responsibilities are there on the part of the CEO. The CEO is responsible
for executing the long-term strategies for the purpose of increasing the shareholder value.
However, the roles and responsibilities of the CEO vary from one organization to another. The
CEO communicates on behalf of the company with the shareholders (Salleh& Othman,
2016).The CEO is entrusted with the responsibility of implementing the vision and mission of
the organization.

4CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Chairman occupies a position superior than the CEO. The Chairman acts as the
board of directors and his role is to protect the interests of the investors by keeping intact the
profitability and stability of the organization (Soltani & Maupetit, 2015).The Chairman is
entrusted with substantial power in setting the agenda of the board with the determination of the
outcomes of the votes.
When Tilles has taken over the CEO position of the company, he could prevent the fraud
in the company from going forward in an exemplary way. He could formulate a clear code of
ethics and conduct along with a well-articulated written policy covering the protection of
company data by avoiding conflict of interests. He can implement policies for the purpose of
recognizing the signs under which employees generally commits fraud. These include working
under intense pressure and being unappreciated at times.
Answer 4:
Martin Shkreli has committed securities fraud by manipulating the share price of
Retrophin from US$33.00 to US$13.60. He was aware of the fact that the drug was very
essential as it was beneficial to the general public as a whole. If the price is increased
considerably, then the general public shall be affected as a result of it. Therefore, by increasing
the price of Retrophin, Martin Shkreli has committed serious offence.
The offence securities fraud committed by Martin Shkreli is a civil offence. This is
because; a civil offence is something which involves disputes between individuals in regard to
their legal duties and responsibilities. However, the nature of the offence was such that it can be
termed as a criminal offence because a criminal offence is one which is against the state or
against the community (Soltani & Maupetit, 2015). Similarly, the act on the part of Martin
Shkreli was such that it affected the general public as well.
Martin Shkreli was sentenced to 7 years in prison for guilty of conspiracy and for
committing securities fraud.
The abuses could have been prevented if investors were aware of certain facts. Firstly, it
is important for the investors to involve in extensive research regarding the products and services
before investing in it.

5CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Answer 5:
I. Agency Theory:
The agency theory emphasizes upon the relationship between principals and agents in a
business organization. This theory is concerned resolving disputes existing within agency
relationships (Toms, Wilson&Wright, 2015).
II. Shareholder Theory:
This theory is based upon the principle that, the shareholders of the company takes part in the
day to day business activities for their own benefit (Salleh & Othman, 2016). According to the
shareholder theory, the shareholders are at the authority to serve their interests and in such
process shall make as much profit as possible.
III. Stakeholder Theory:
The stakeholder theory emphasizes on the fact that, an organization has certain
responsibilities towards the stakeholders other than the shareholders. According to the
stakeholder theory, the organization has certain responsibilities towards the communities for the
purpose of improving their reputation (Tunley et al., 2018).
In the present case study, the shareholder theory can be applied to the actions on the part of
Martin Shkreli. This is due to the reason, the actions on the part of Shkreli was such that it was
for the purpose of maximizing his personal interests and the interests of the shareholders of the
company. The agency theory can also be applied because the shareholders (principal) of the
company were not aware of the activities of Martin Shkreli (agent). The stakeholders’ theory can
be applied because Martin Shkreli being the CEO failed to take responsibilities of the
stakeholders.
Conclusion:
In the conclusion, it can be stated that, the principles of corporate governance are such
that it cannot control the practice of White Collar Crime in the long run. Therefore, it is
important on the part of the management to emphasize upon the ethical codes of conduct for the
purpose of strengthening the punishment related to White Collar Crime. It can be finally

6CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
concluded that, the management for the purpose of increasing the integrity of the company shall
monitor certain compliances in order to reduce corporate fraud.
(Total word count is 1642)

7CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
References:
Foreman-Peck, J., & Hannah, L. (2015). UK corporate law and corporate governance before
1914: a re-interpretation. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books?
id=6YleCwAAQBAJ&dq=Foreman-Peck,+J.,+%26+Hannah,+L.+(2015).
+UK+corporate+law+and+corporate+governance+before+1914:+a+re-
interpretation.&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks
García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., & Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2015). Board of
directors and ethics codes in different corporate governance systems. Journal of Business
Ethics, 131(3), 681-698. doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2300-y
Gottschalk, P. (2017). Private police legitimacy: the case of internal investigations by fraud
examiners. Policing: An International Journal, 40(3), 628-640. doi
https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-04-2016-0053
Harrison, K., & Ryder, N. (2016). The law relating to financial crime in the United Kingdom.
Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317026051
Katmon, N., & Al Farooque, O. (2017). Exploring the impact of internal corporate governance
on the relation between disclosure quality and earnings management in the UK listed
companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(2), 345-367. doi
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2752-8
Krambia-Kapardis, M. (2016). Financial Crisis, Fraud, and Corruption. In Corporate Fraud and
Corruption (pp. 5-38). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Retrieved from
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137406439_2
Kusumaningtias, R., Ludigdo, U., Irianto, G., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2016). Rethinking of
Corporate Governance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 455-464. doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.020
Mangala, D., & Kumari, P. (2015). Corporate fraud prevention and detection: Revisiting the
literature. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2678909

8CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
O’Connell, D. (2015). The UK Bribery Act: Challenges and opportunities for Australian
business. Governance Directions, 67(5), 311. Retrieved from
https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=257511793204055;res=IELBUS
Raiborn, C., Butler, J. B., Martin, K., & Pizzini, M. (2017). The Internal audit function: A
prerequisite for good governance. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 28(2),
10-21. doi https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22246
Sadasivam, G. S., Subrahmanyam, M., Himachalam, D., Pinnamaneni, B. P., & Lakshme, S. M.
(2016). Corporate governance fraud detection from annual reports using big data
analytics. International Journal of Big Data Intelligence, 3(1), 51-60.
Salleh, S. M., & Othman, R. (2016). Board of director's attributes as deterrence to corporate
fraud. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 82-91. doi
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBDI.2016.073895
Soltani, B., & Maupetit, C. (2015). Importance of core values of ethics, integrity and
accountability in the European corporate governance codes. Journal of Management &
Governance, 19(2), 259-284. doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9259-4
Toms, S., Wilson, N., & Wright, M. (2015). The evolution of private equity: corporate
restructuring in the UK, c. 1945–2010. Business History, 57(5), 736-768. doi
https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2014.977262
Tunley, M., Button, M., Shepherd, D., & Blackbourn, D. (2018). Preventing occupational
corruption: utilising situational crime prevention techniques and theory to enhance
organisational resilience. Security Journal, 31(1), 21-52. doi
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-016-0087-5