Corporate Law Study Material with Solved Assignments and Essays

This study material covers short and long questions related to Corporate Law including topics like liability of shareholders, directors, and employees, internal management of a company, and financing long-term projects. It also includes references to relevant laws and regulations.

Running head: CORPORATE LAW
Corporate Law
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Authors Note:

1CORPORATE LAW
Contents
Short questions:...............................................................................................................................2
Long questions:................................................................................................................................6
Answer 1:.....................................................................................................................................6
Answer 2:.....................................................................................................................................6
References:......................................................................................................................................9

2CORPORATE LAW
Short questions:
Answer 1:
Issue:
Does transforming a business from sole trader to limited liability resolves the sole trader of any
subsequent liability for injury loss or contract made by the company?
Rules:
Corporations Act 2001 is the premier legislation that governs the provisions related to the
companies in the country. A limited liability company is a separate legal entity different from its
shareholders. However that does not mean that the shareholders are completely resolved from all
liabilities. Thus, for liability for injury loss and contract made by such companies the
shareholders are liable to certain extent (Parker, 2015).
Application:
In case the liability for injury loss or from any contract has been arisen due to the decision of the
shareholders then the shareholders will be liable to the extent it was beyond the power of the
company to enter into such contract (Lo, 2017).
Conclusion:
Hence creation of company does not resolve Peter completely from any subsequent liability that
may arise in the future. Peter would have to interact with ASX if he wants to list the shares of the
company in the stock exchange (Solaiman, 2017).
Answer 2:

3CORPORATE LAW
Issue:
Are the directors personally liable for insolvent trading and the steps to be taken for voluntary
liquidation of a company?
Rules:
Section 95A (1) of the Corporations Act, 2001 provides that the onus to prove that the directors
of an insolvent company are personally liable is on the person alleging directors liability for
transactions entered into with the company. A person or organization if unable to pay all his or
its debts as when these fall due then such organization or person is referred to as insolvent as per
s 95A(2) of the act (Brotchie and Morrison, 2017).
The regulatory guide 217 issued by ASIC wants the directors to prevent insolvent trading. The
directors must take professional help in addressing difficulties relating to finances of an insolvent
company.
Application:
It is clear that the directors have not followed the Regulatory Guide 2017 issued by ASIC thus,
the directors are personally liable for breach of duty. For voluntary administration the directors
must call the meetings of shareholders and creditors to pass the resolution for voluntary
administration of the company (Cassidy, 2017).
Conclusion:
Directors are personally liable in this case as they have not followed the relevant guidelines of
ASIC.

4CORPORATE LAW
Answer 3:
Internal management of a company is governed by the following:
I. Replaceable rules provided under the Corporations Ac 2001 or,
II. Constitution of the company or,
III. A communication of the above two.
The rules provided in the constitution cannot be in contravention with the provisions of the
Corporations Act 2001 (the act). In case any rule in the Constitution of a company is in
contravention with the provisions of the act then such rules will be void (Fordham, Robinson and
Blackwell, 2017).
In this case the rules are said to be unfair to the members but these are not in contravention with
the provisions of the act (not mentioned as such in the case study) hence, refusing to comply with
the rules of the constitution will be considered as a breach of the act. Thus, the members cannot
refuse to comply with the rules of the constitution as long as these are not in contravention of the
provisions of the act (Marx, Singh and Fleming, 2015).
Answer 4:
Issue:
Does employees need to leave employment subsequent to signing non-compete agreement and
liability of the employee if he takes employment in one of the family member’s company?
Rules:
A company is not allowed to force his employees to sign non-competition agreement and even if
an employee signs an agreement to not compete against the company that does not require the
employee to leave the employment. In fact the employer has the right to terminate an employee

5CORPORATE LAW
from his position in case such employee refuses to sign a non-compete agreement (Bishara,
Martin and Thomas, 2015).
Application:
Thus there is no requirement for an employee to leave employment subsequent to signing non-
competition agreement with the company. Thus, naturally there is no liability even if the officer
takes employment in any of the company that belongs to the family members of the earlier
employer (Lee, Sameen and Cowling, 2015).
Conclusion:
No, an employee need not leave his employment subsequent to signing of non-competition
agreement and no liability for taking employment in any other company of the former’s family
members.
Answer 5:
The requirements of funds to finance long term projects for large companies are significantly
huge. Often such funds cannot be arranged from a single source such as owners’ capital or share
capital. In order to arrange necessary funds companies in such case apart from issuing shares to
the public borrows money from banks and financial institutions (Fraser, Bhaumik and Wright,
2015).
Taking loan from banks also allow the companies to achieve financial and operating leverage by
using the tax advantage of interest payments for such loans which is not allowed for payment of
dividends to the shareholders. A company will be able to leverage its tax position by using

6CORPORATE LAW
proportionate borrowed capital. Hence, there are significant advantage both on financial
performance and tax position of an organization for use of loan funds.
Long questions:
Answer 1:
A company is an entity registered under the Corporations Act 2001. An entity listed in
the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) has the option to issue its shares to the public to raise
necessary funds to finance different projects.
Being public limited company, A Ltd has mainly three operations to arrange the required funds
of $400,000, these are internal financing by using the funds retained in the business over the
years, i.e. accumulated retained earnings; to raise capital by issuing additional shares and by
borrowing funds from banks or by issuing debentures. However, the facts provided in the
document has made it clear that A Ltd is not permitted to issue the shares to the external public
without passing special resolution (Ferrando and Preuss, 2018).
It is always desirable to have an optimum capital structure for an organization. An optimum
capital structure is the one where there is perfect blend between equity shareholders’ funds and
borrowed funds. Thus, before deciding the sources to collect necessary funds for business it is
important to evaluate the existing capital structure of a company. After evaluating the existing
capital structure the company should decide the sources to be used to arrange capital.
In this case the company should use both borrowed funds as well issue additional shares to the
existing shareholders proportionate to arrange the required funds of $400,000. As a result the
capital structure would not be changed and at the same time the company would be able to enjoy
operating leverage (Ferrando and Preuss, 2018).

7CORPORATE LAW
Answer 2:
In case an entity finds it difficult to pay off its debts then it can be put into administration.
Placement of a company into administration can be voluntary or involuntary. Involuntary
administration is when the creditors place the company into administration. Such administration
is also referred to as external administration. Generally the creditors who have claims against the
company can place the company into external administration if the claims are not met by the
company as and when fall due.
The creditors will be involved at the time when an entity enters into external administration or
liquidation process. Generally, there are two types of creditors namely, secured and unsecured
creditors. A company needs to make payments to the creditors fully in case it has resources
available at the time of external administration or proportionately to their respective dues when
the company does not have adequate resources to pay off the creditors fully.
In this case the PQR Pty Ltd is continuously finding it difficult to pay off its debts and as a result
the creditors of the company has decided to place the company into involuntary liquidation. The
company now needs to call the meeting of the creditors to pass the resolution for involuntary
liquidation. The creditors subsequent to the involuntary liquidations must be paid in full or
proportionately to discharge their liabilities. As discussed earlier sectored creditors shall be paid
first then the employees’ dues shall be cleared before making payment to the unsecured
creditors. After making the payment to the creditors if any balance is left in the hands of the
administrator of the company then such balance shall be proportionately distributed to the
shareholders in proportion to their shareholding in the company. It is important to note that after
discharging the liabilities of all the creditors, both secured and unsecured creditors, if any

8CORPORATE LAW
balance remains then only proportionate payments shall be made to the shareholders of the
company (Lipton, 2017).
Secured creditors shall have preferential right to the payment over and above the other creditors.
The dues in respect of employees shall also have preferential right to the payment as the
employee are treated as special creditors. Generally after payment of secured creditors the
payments to the employees are made in respect of their dues before making payment to the
unsecured creditors.

9CORPORATE LAW
References:
Bishara, N.D., Martin, K.J. and Thomas, R.S., 2015. An empirical analysis of noncompetition
clauses and other restrictive postemployment covenants. Vand. L. Rev., 68, p.1.
Brotchie, J. and Morrison, D., 2017. Insolvent trading and voluntary administration in Australia:
economic winners and losers?. Accounting & Finance.
Cassidy, J., 2017, July. Superfluous or superlative: The role of reckless/insolvent trading
prohibitions in New Zealand and Australian directors' duties regime. In Australasian Law
Teachers Association 2017 Annual Conference. Available at:
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/35792 [Accessed on 20 October 2018]
Ferrando, A. and Preuss, C., 2018. What finance for what investment? Survey-based evidence
for European companies. Economia Politica, pp.1-39.
Fordham, A.E., Robinson, G.M. and Blackwell, B.D., 2017. Corporate social responsibility in
resource companies–Opportunities for developing positive benefits and lasting
legacies. Resources Policy, 52, pp.366-376.
Fraser, S., Bhaumik, S.K. and Wright, M., 2015. What do we know about entrepreneurial finance
and its relationship with growth?. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), pp.70-88.
Lee, N., Sameen, H. and Cowling, M., 2015. Access to finance for innovative SMEs since the
financial crisis. Research policy, 44(2), pp.370-380.
Lipton, P., 2017. The Introduction of Limited Liability into the English and Australian Colonial
Companies Acts: Inevitable Progression or Chaotic History. Melb. UL Rev., 41, p.1278.
Lo, S.H., 2017. Piercing of the corporate veil for evasion of tort obligations. Common Law
World Review, 46(1), pp.42-60. Available at:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1473779516682195 [Accessed on 20 October 2018]
Marx, M., Singh, J. and Fleming, L., 2015. Regional disadvantage? Employee non-compete
agreements and brain drain. Research Policy, 44(2), pp.394-404.
Parker, D., 2015. The Company in the 21 st Century: Piercing the veil: reconceptualising the
company under law. Journal of Business Systems, Governance & Ethics, 10(2).
Solaiman, S.M., 2017. Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest
for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(2), pp.155-179.

10CORPORATE LAW