This document discusses the different types of legal entities and their business structures, along with the associated costs and administrative burdens. It explores the liability of partners and directors in partnerships and companies, as well as their duties in maintaining fair and transparent business practices.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: Corporation and Business Structure Corporation and Business Structure [Type the document subtitle] Laptop04011 [Pick the date]
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Corporation and Business Structure1 Contents Part A...............................................................................................................................................1 Part B...............................................................................................................................................2 Part C...............................................................................................................................................3 Bibliography....................................................................................................................................5 Books and Journal........................................................................................................................5 Case Laws....................................................................................................................................5 Legislations..................................................................................................................................5 Books and Journal........................................................................................................................6 Other Source................................................................................................................................6
Corporation and Business Structure2 Part A Basically there are three types of legal entities formed in the environment that are sole trader, partnership firm and proprietary company. All the three types of formations have different business structures that are available for people in the environment. This part of the paper will adequately explain and evaluate the set up and administration cost along with the administrative burden in the three different types of legal formations present in the environment. Initially taking about sole trader formation, it should be noted that under this state a person single handed own and control the functions of the enterprise. This is the simplest form of the starting the business as it does not include any legal formalities involved in it. However, registration of business is required in Australia; otherwise the business will fall under the category of exemption. Cost of registration for a business is $36 which is also applicable for a sole trader type of business entity as well. It should also be noted that a separate bank account is not required for this type business. Low cost of maintenance is an attractive feature of this type of business however; the burden in a sole trader entity is completely applied to the sole owner only. It is important for a sole trader to keep the account of minimum five years that involves the cost factor1. Second aspect is a partnership business structure which involves two or more people for its formation. The registration of this business structure is same as sole trader. It is important to register the name of business along with Australian business number and separate bank account as well. The trademark of a partnership business costs more than a sole propriety. Administrative burden and liability is also shared under this type of business structure. Company is most different form of business structure as in Australia, it is important for every organization to register themselves under ASIC. The cost of registration of a company is $488 and the annual review fee is $263 if the proprietary is registered with ASIC. The administrative burden is held by the directors and other officers of the company2. 1Shawn Bayern, The Implications of Modern Business–Entity Law for the Regulation of Autonomous Systems.European Journal of Risk Regulation7.2 (2016): 297-309. 2Business.gov.au,What are the set-up steps and costs?(Web Page) <https://www.business.gov.au/change-and- growth/restructuring/sole-trader-to-a-company/difference-between-a-sole-trader-and-a-company/what-are-the- set-up-steps-and-costs>.
Corporation and Business Structure3 Part B Under the partnership firm, the business partners are personally liable to the third party unlike separate legal entity. Every state in Australia have different legislation that administer the structure of business however, the provisions are same to each other. Agency relation is maintain between the partners for the firm and other partners can also enter in the same contract with the outsider on behalf of the business as there is no separate presence of the firm from its partners3. The liability of the partnership firm is considered as the personal liability of the partners in the environment which means that the partners have unlimited liability to the third party in most of the events. Partners are liable to third party as well as to themselves4. The section 9 of Partnership Act 1981 elaborated that the partners of a firm are liable for all the trades that are conducted on their end on behalf of the firm. In section 12 explains the liability of partners of the firm that every partner needs to pay the debts of the firm jointly and severally in the personal manner. The agency relationship explains that implied as well as expressed authorities are attained to the partners. The expressed authority is attained from the rights explained under the partnership agreement. It is important for the partners to act under the legal boundaries of the firm. Partnership agreement is a mutual contract between the partners so third party cannot attain information about the rights and authority of a partner. In many case the partner act outside their legal boundaries of a partner. So, under such circumstances the law secures the rights of third party. Like in the given case ofPolkinghorne v Holland5which held that the other partner is liable for the unauthorized act of one partner. However, it is important that the act should be related to the ordinary business activity. Further, according to the limited liability rule, neither the members nor the director can be held liable for the functions of the company. It was stated in the case ofSalomon v Salomon6that the company is a separate legal entity and there is presence of an artificial corporate veil present between the directors and the company. This rule further added in the caseLee v Lee’s Air farming Ltd7.On the basis of this case, directors and officers are not personally liable for the 3MyLawyer,Liability of existing partners(Web Page) <https://www.mylawyer.co.uk/liability-of-existing-partners- a-A76058D76098/>. 4Leslie Corwin, and Ciampi Arthur,Law Firm Partnership Agreements. Law Journal Press, 2018 51934 51 clr 143 6[1896] UKHL 1, [1897] AC 22 7[1960] UKPC 33
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Corporation and Business Structure4 contract of the company with the outsiders. In case of breach of the contract made by outsider, then the responsibility will be on the whole company. However, many exception cases can also be seen under which the directors can be held personally liable. This situation includes the circumstances under which the director is involved in fraudulent activities and according to the opinion of court, it is important to hold them personally liable for their work. This type of circumstance is known as lifting the corporate veil under which the company is not assumed as a different legal entity and the person is held liable by the court for the wrongful actions performed by them. So, it should be noted that the above mentioned are the liability of the partners in a proprietary company8. Part C In a company and partnership firm, partners and directors do not have their only liability to the third parties but they are also liable to each other while acting on behalf of the firm. As explained above that there is presence of agency relationship in mutual and they are liable for the conduct of each other which subsequently create a fiduciary relationship between them. The common law as well as legislation laid emphasis on the duties of a partner. The part 3 of Partnership Act 1981 defined the agency relationship of the partners with each other. The provision of Section 31 of the Partnership Act 1981 (hereinafter referred to as an act) states that it is the duty of each and every partner to provide the true and fair accounts of the firm which may also affect the interest of other partners in the environment. The section 32 states that partners that are acting in behalf of the firm should proceed in a fair manner and should not make any secret profits. Transactions made under the name of the business should be informed to other partners as well. Also, it should be noted that a partner should not work on any personal business that can be a competitor for the partnership firm9. Under the section 33 of the act, if a partner performs such act then they need to return all the profits earned by their personal business to the partnership business. This is one of the statutory liabilities that a partner owes to other partners. Further, in case ofBirtchnell v Equity Trustee, 8Rebel Cole and Sokolyk Tatyana, "How do firms choose legal form of organization?."31st Australasian Finance and Banking Conference. 2018. 9Law Insider,Liability of Partners Sample Clauses(Web Page) <https://www.lawinsider.com/clause/liability-of- partners>
Corporation and Business Structure5 Executors & Agency Co Ltd10,it was explained that the partner should not perform any action that contradicts with the best interest of the business. The common law states that every partner of the company should perform all the actions fairly and they should not make undue advantage of their position held in the business11. Further, talking about the duties of the directors of the company, it should be noted that the Corporation Act of 2001 is the main legislation of Australia that evaluates the duties of the directors. The duties of general director are explained in the sections 180 to 183 of the Corporation Act 2001. Section 180 of the act explains that it is the responsibility of every director and officer of the company to perform all the actions diligently with care. The section 181 section explained that every officer and director of the company needs to perform duties that are in the best interest of the company and are purposeful. The Directors of the company should be held responsible for the company, thus they are the people who make crucial decisions in favour of the growth and financial position of the company12. Being placed on such a position, there are higher chances that they can misuse their position in the company. The section 182 forbids such action as according to this section, no officer or director make use of their position in the company to attain personal gains in a wrongful manner or to provide benefits to other people who can harm the activities of the company13. These people cannot make use of price sensitive information for their personal gains that can affect the activities of the company. Along with the general duties, the officers and directors also hold special duties in the environment. Section 191 of the act states that the transactions in which personal interest of the director are involved so it becomes the duty of the director to disclose such information to the other directors as well. The section 588G explains that it also becomes their duty to not involve in such transactions during the period of insolvency. Similarly in case of the partnership firm, the directors are liable to provide an independent as well as informed judgement while performing their duties in the business14. The section also explained that the directors of the Australian companies also need to disclose their 10(1929) 42 CLR 384 11Classic.austlii.edu.au, Partnership Act 1958 - SECT 34(Web Page)<http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/p84a1958135/s34.html>. 12Malcolm Burrows,Director’s duty to prevent insolvent trading(Web Page)< https://www.dundaslawyers.com.au/directors-duty-to-prevent-insolvent-trading/>. 13Lawhandbook.sa.gov.au,General Duties of Directors - CorporationsAct 2001 (Cth)(Web Page) <https://lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch05s04s02.php>.
Corporation and Business Structure6 actions and personal benefits while working in behalf of the corporate. Division 3 of the act halts the activities that are related to secret profits and insider trading. According to this provision, the price sensitive information should be used in favour of the business only and not to provide personal gains in the environment. Bibliography Books and Journal Case Laws Birtchnell v Equity Trustee, Executors & Agency Co Ltd(1929) 42 CLR 384 Polkinghorne v Holland1934 51 clr 143 Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd[1960] UKPC 33 Salomon vASalomon& Co Ltd[1896] UKHL 1, [1897] AC 22 Legislations Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Partnership Act 1958 (Vic) Books and Journal ShawnBayern,TheImplicationsofModernBusiness–EntityLawfortheRegulationof Autonomous Systems.European Journal of Risk Regulation7.2 (2016): 297-309. Leslie Corwin, and Ciampi Arthur,Law Firm Partnership Agreements. Law Journal Press, 2018. Rebel Cole and Sokolyk Tatyana, "How do firms choose legal form of organization?."31st Australasian Finance and Banking Conference. 2018. 14Legal Nature,What Is Your Liability In a Partnership? (Web Page) <http://help.legalnature.com/articles/what-is- your-liability-in-a-partnership>
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.