Money laundering is a serious white-collar crime that involves concealing the origin of illegally obtained money. This article discusses Nigerian laws on money laundering, including the Money-Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004. It also covers red flags that financial institutions should look out for to identify potentially suspicious activities.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS LAW Corporations and Business Law Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS LAW A. Money Laundering involves the concealment of the origin from where a particular amount of money has been earned, which is obtained by way of illegal means. This concealment may be effected by transfer of the illegally obtained money to legitimate businesses or foreign banks. Money Laundering is one of the most heinous sort of white-collar crimes in this world. In Nigeria, the money laundering has evolved in the 1980’s. Many efforts were made by the then Government of Nigeria to tackle the situation. In its initial stage, Nigerian laws recognised money laundering as an activity relating to drug trafficking. This has enabled many money laundering events not related to drug trafficking to get away with it1. At present, the statute governing money laundering is the Money-Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004. This Act enables the Government Agencies to investigate into the matters relating to money laundering and prosecute the offenders2. Section 1 of the Money Laundering Act prohibits a person or a body corporate from accepting or making any deposit a sum of N500, 000 in case of individuals and N2, 000, 000 for a corporate body except through transactional institutions. Section 2 of the Act requires any transactions of funds or securities from or to any foreign countries exceeding the sum of US $ 10,000 to be brought to the notice of the central bank of Nigeria. Subsection 2 of this section requires the report indicating the amount and nature of such transfer, the names and residential addresses of the receiver and the sender of the funds or securities. 1Markovska, Anna, and Nya Adams. "Political corruption and money laundering: lessons from Nigeria." Journal of Money Laundering Control 18.2 (2015): 169-181. 2Masciandaro, Donato, ed. Global financial crime: terrorism, money laundering and offshore centres. Taylor & Francis, 2017.
2CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS LAW Section 5 of the Act requires the financial institution to verify the identity and the addresses of the customer before opening an account, issuing a passbook or entering into any business relationship with the potential customers. It may also requires the production of such other related documents to be produced as it deems fit. Section 6 of the Act is concerned with the detection of money laundering activities. Section 10 of the Act mandates the disclosure of the details of financial transactions. Section 9 of the Act requires the financial institutions to develop programmes for combating the laundering of proceeds relating to a crime or other illegal acts. Sections 14 to section 18 of the Act provides for different offences relating to money laundering and penalties for such offences. The enactment of the Money Laundering Act, 2004 was a drastic step in the Nigerian money laundering laws but it is not adequate to combat and eradicate the offence in its totality. Moreover, the agencies involved in the implementation of the laws relating to Money Laundering has in many instances resorted to corruption. The bankers involved in financial transactions failing to report any illegal transactions to the concerned authorities3. There is a lack of regular monitoring of the activities of financial institutions. There exists an unethical alliance between the officers and the financial institutions, which leads to the inefficient and ineffective implementation of the rules relating to money laundering. B. Money Laundering is an offence for both the individuals who are party to it or who are aiding it. The person who are involved in the money laundering is an easier task than locating the individuals who are aiding the Laundering of money. In this context the phrase knows or suspects is recognised. Money Laundering is an offence for both individuals who are parties 3Masciandaro, Donato, ed. Global financial crime: terrorism, money laundering and offshore centres. Taylor & Francis, 2017.
3CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS LAW to it or who has failed to disclose the knowledge of such a transaction. The failure to disclose concerns the knowledge of the person about the same. For the purpose of disclosure of money laundering requirement the objective test of knowledge or suspicion should be applied. According to this test, a person will be considered to be involved in the offence of money laundering in the event of his failure to disclose the same when that individual has the reasonable grounds for knowledge or suspicion of the same4. The person alleged to have failed to disclose the same cannot take resort to the fact that he was unable to realize the instance of money laundering owing to his ignorance or his being naïve. If it is evident that an individual should have knowledge or suspicion regarding such laundering of money, then he will be guilty of the same offence as the parties directly involved in5. The offenders of the failure to disclose offences relating to money laundering must: Haveknowledgeabouttheidentityofthepersonsinvolvedinthemoney laundering or the knowledge of the place where the property so laundered has been kept, Has the belief that the knowledge they have about the same will assist the investigation about the money laundering. However, there are certain defences that are available to the person alleged to have failed to disclose his knowledge about the offence of money laundering. These defences can be enumerated as follows: That the person has a reasonable excuse for the same, 4Bac, Jo. Is Bad-Faith the New Wilful Blindness?: The Company Directors’ Duty of Good Faith and Wilful Blindness Doctrine Under Common Law Usa (Delaware) and Uk (England): a Comparative Study. Trafford Publishing, 2017. 5Diaz, Clive, and Tricia Aylward. "A Study on Senior Managers’ Views of Participation in One Local Authority… a Case of Wilful Blindness?." The British Journal of Social Work (2018).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS LAW ď‚·That the information has arrived to the person as a privileged information in case the person is a practicing legal practitioner, ď‚·Where the person was not properly trained by the employer. Wilful blindness implies a situation relating to a person who strives to avoid any criminal or civil liability for any unlawful act by keeping himself unaware of the circumstances intentionally, the knowledge of which would render him liable6. In case of money laundering, most of the times, the persons probable to have the knowledge of such an offence seeks to avoid the same by seeking resort to unawareness of the crime of money laundering. This would not always waive his liability. A person of reasonable prudence is expected to have the awareness of the events occurring around him. His statement of unawareness about the happenings of is surroundings would not be considered as a defence in case of failure to disclose an event of money laundering. The person who is taking resort to the wilful blindness will be liable for the concealment of the offence committed in his presence. C. Red flags implies potentially suspicious activities7. The management of an financial institutions are under an obligation to report any potentially suspicious activities relating to money laundering. For the purpose of red flags, the financial institutions are under an obligation to report any activity, which they suspects to be related to money laundering. However, in such an event, the financial institution is only liable for reporting such an activity. It is not liable or authorize to investigate into or determining the authenticity of that suspicion8. 6Ewart-James, Joanna, and Neill Wilkins. "The staff wanted initiative: Preventing exploitation, forced labour and trafficking in the UK hospitality industry." Vulnerability, Exploitation and Migrants. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2015. 256-268. 7Naheem, Mohammed Ahmad. "Money laundering: A primer for banking staff." International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 13.2 (2016): 135-156. 8Naheem, Mohammed Ahmad. "Trade based money laundering: A primer for banking staff." International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 14.2 (2017): 95-117.
5CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS LAW Therearecertainpotentiallysuspiciousactivitiesthatindicatesmoneylaundering. Customers of a financial institution providing inadequate information or information that is likely to result in suspicion is a reasonable ground for suspecting money laundering. Sometimes the customers may furnish that cannot be verified readily. The financial institutions are required to file reports and maintain records of the customers transactions. If in doing the same the customer fails to provide proper documents and information aiding such maintenance of report and records, there lies a suspicion against him regarding money laundering. The financial transactions involving a huge amount of money needs to be supported by proper documents. Such a transaction would involve numerous paper works and other requirements. Any customer refusing to furnish the same is prone suspicion relating to money laundering. The customers of a financial institution must always provide for a source from where he is availing such amount of money. In case the source of a customer’s income is inconsistent with his business, it is a reasonable ground to form a suspicion of the commission of money laundering. In case of mortgage, the financial institutions should have a proper knowledge of all the aspects. The name and addresses of the mortgagor, mortgagee or any other third person involved in the same. The amount of loan and the worth of the goods thus pledged must be taken into account by the financial institution effecting the same. Incaseofbanktobanktransaction,thebanksshouldbeverycarefulaboutthe whereabouts of the accounts involved in the transactions. The bank should track the account holder. All the details must be taken by the financial institutions, before effecting such a transactions.
6CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS LAW In case of crossborder financialinstitutiontransactions,the probabilityof money laundering is the highest. Most of the money laundering cases are effected involving a cross border funnelling of money. Such an activity of money laundering is very risky to spot. However, in such cases, the financial institutions are under an obligation to analyse and investigate every aspect of such a transfer. Their ignorance of the activity would not be considered to be a defence in the same. The financial institution should carry out a thorough background check of all the parties involved in such a transfer of funds. It should refer to the past situations of similar nature. The financial institutions should reach out to other financial institutions in the market and make consideration of their past experiences. In case of any visible anomaly, the financial institutions are under an obligation to report the same to the proper authorities.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS LAW Reference Bac, Jo. Is Bad-Faith the New Wilful Blindness?: The Company Directors’ Duty of Good Faith and Wilful Blindness Doctrine Under Common Law Usa (Delaware) and Uk (England): a Comparative Study. Trafford Publishing, 2017. Diaz, Clive, and Tricia Aylward. "A Study on Senior Managers’ Views of Participation in One Local Authority… a Case of Wilful Blindness?." The British Journal of Social Work (2018). Ewart-James,Joanna,andNeillWilkins."Thestaffwantedinitiative:Preventing exploitation, forced labour and trafficking in the UK hospitality industry." Vulnerability, Exploitation and Migrants. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2015. 256-268. Markovska, Anna, and Nya Adams. "Political corruption and money laundering: lessons from Nigeria." Journal of Money Laundering Control 18.2 (2015): 169-181. Masciandaro, Donato, ed. Global financial crime: terrorism, money laundering and offshore centres. Taylor & Francis, 2017. Masciandaro, Donato, ed. Global financial crime: terrorism, money laundering and offshore centres. Taylor & Francis, 2017. Naheem, Mohammed Ahmad. "Money laundering: A primer for banking staff." International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 13.2 (2016): 135-156. Naheem, Mohammed Ahmad. "Trade based money laundering: A primer for banking staff." International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 14.2 (2017): 95-117. The Money-Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004