Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 TASK...............................................................................................................................................3 A.............................................................................................................................................3 B.............................................................................................................................................4 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6
INTRODUCTION Cost reduction is significant management task which ensures desired profitability for a business entity. In this context this strategy covers computation of job cost, and advantages, criticism and explanation of activity-based costing. TASK A. Calculation of cost of Job:Following are key calculation for computing cost of job, as follows: Direct CostsIndirect Costs €€ Materials :65,000Labour:19,000 Labour:72,000Depreciation:10,000 Rent and Rates:6,800 Heating:5,000 Indirect materials:4,000 Others:2,000 Total:1,37,00046,800 Machine hours :2,900 Direct labour:19000 (€ 72000/1 9000) =3.79€p/hr Overhead recovery rate: 46,800/2900 =16.14€p/hr Budgeted costs for Job: Option A:
Direct labour:1,137 (€ 3.79 x 300) Direct material :1,560 Overheads:739 (46800 x 1137 / 72000) 3,436 Option B: Direct labour:1,137 Direct material :1,560 Overheads :807 ( € 16.14 p/hr x 50 ) 3,504 Explanation about basis of dealing with overheads: Accordingtotheabovecomputationofcost-Job,activity-basedcostinghasbeen measured and options A and B are ascertained. In total cost of work, the amount of direct- material and direct-labor through activity-based costing are same, the only distinction is in overhead costs. In Option-A job-cost is ascertained on the basis of consideration of overheads which is computed as per budgeted work hours. Overheads are ascertained by multiplication of direct- labour on the basis of the planned 300 working hours of € 1137 (€ 3.79x 300) with a proportion of the total indirect-labour costs and direct-labour costs (€ 46800/72000). While job-cost are measured in Option B with overhead costs are determined taking into account budgeted machine hours. In this alternative, the overheads quantity is computed by multiplying overhead-recovery rate, i.e. using € 16.14 p.hr. with budgeted-hours of machinery, i.e. 50 hours. The overhead recovery rate here has been computed to total indirect costs by total machine hours.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Ithasbeenanalysedfromtheevaluationofbothoptionsthatoption-Aismore appropriate as the cost of Job is below Job-cost in option-B within this option. It is therefore necessary to move towards the implementation of Option A in order to fulfill the job of cost- reduction management. B. Activity Based Costing:Activity-based costing (ABC) is a very efficacious instrument for those engaged in tasks for business operations improvement, enhancement and cost decrease. The idea defines ABC as an budgeting methodology that allocates important production expenses depending on their sources and nature to different activities (Dijkman, La Rosa and Reijers, 2012). Advantages of Activity Based Costing methods: ï‚·Generates more specific and accurate costing with respect of products & services and distribution channel. ï‚·Provides a better and detailed understanding about aspect of overheads. ï‚·Simple in calculation and compatible for different employees. ï‚·It use the unit-cost instead of entire cost. ï‚·Provides an effective integration with methods like Six-Sigma and other related to steady improvement. ï‚·It exhibits more clearly non-value added and unproductive activities. ï‚·It assist in managing outcomes and achieve benchmarks(Govindan, Khodaverdi and Jafarian, 2013) ï‚·Support the calculation of process-costing, value streams and supply chains. ï‚·Facilitates benchmarking ï‚·Activity-Based Costing reflects way operations are going on in manufacturing entity. Criticisms of Activity Based Costing: ï‚·A significant project requiring significant resources is implementation of an ABC system. Onceactivity-basedcostingschemehasbeenintroduceditisexpensivetokeep. Information must be gathered, verified and entered into process for various activity measures. ï‚·ABC generates figures which are at odds withnumbers generated by conventional costing procedures like product margins. But executives are used to appliestraditional
costing systems to operate their activities, and standard costing systems are being used to evaluate efficiency. CONCLUSION From above assessment its has been articulated that management should apply different methods to asses cost like job costing, activity-based costing to maintain accountability in various operations within enterprise.