Course Project Criteria

The assignment is a course project that requires students to identify their leadership role in a healthcare organization, describe a vision and mission statement, motivate employees, and create a strategic plan. The plan should include monitoring the success of the plan and providing a presentation to the company's board of directors. Additionally, the paper should demonstrate proper organizational skills, usage, mechanics, grammar, spelling, sentence structure, style, and APA elements.

Course Project
Course Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeIdentify
your leadership
role in the
healthcare
organization
Correctly identifies the
leadership role in the
healthcare organization
with depth and breadth
and provides
substantiating
evidence.
50.0 pts
Correctly identifies
most of the
leadership role in the
healthcare
organization with
substantiating
evidence.
38.0 pts
Partially identifies the
leadership role in the
healthcare organization
but omits or incorrectly
describes a component
or omits substantiating
evidence.
25.0 pts
Identification of
leadership role in the
healthcare
organization is
incomplete and omits
substantiating
evidence.
0.0 pts
50.0 p
ts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeDescribe
a vision and
mission
statement that
reflects your
goals for the
organization.
Completely and
accurately describes a
vision and mission
statement that reflects
goals for the
organization and
provides substantiating
evidence and clarity of
thought.
50.0 pts
Correctly describes a
vision and mission
statement that
reflects goals for the
organization with
substantiating
evidence.
38.0 pts
Partially describes a
vision and mission
statement that reflects
goals for the
organization, but omits
or incorrectly identifies
a component or offers
partial substantiating
evidence.
25.0 pts
Description of vision
and mission
statement does not
reflect goals for the
organization and
omits substantiating
evidence.
0.0 pts
50.0 p
ts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeExplain
how you will
motivate your
employees to
meet the mission
and goals of the
organization
Thoroughly and
completely explains how
to motivate employees
to meet the mission and
goals of the organization
demonstrating a
complete understanding
of the concepts and
provides substantiating
evidence for the
decision.
50.0 pts
Explains how to
motivate employees
to meet the mission
and goals of the
organization with
clarity of thought but
offers partial,
incomplete or
inaccurate
substantiating
evidence.
38.0 pts
Partially explains how to
motivate employees to
meet the mission and
goals of the organization
but is somewhat
ambiguous or unclear,
contain some
incompleteness and
offers partial
substantiating evidence.
25.0 pts
Explanation of
how to motivate
employees to meet
the mission and
goals of the
organization is
unclear, or
contains major
flaws in concept
mastery.
0.0 pts
50.0 p
ts
This criterion is
linked to a
Correctly describes
how to engage
community support
Correctly describes
how to engage
community support but
Partially describes how
to engage community
support but omits or
Inaccurately describes
how to engage
community support or
50.0 p
ts

Course Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
Learning
OutcomeDescribe
how to engage
community
support.
with depth and
breadth and provides
solid substantiating
evidence.
50.0 pts
minor flaws in
reasoning are present
or offers partial
substantiating
evidence.
38.0 pts
incorrectly describes a
component or omits
substantiating
evidence.
25.0 pts
major flaws in
concept mastery and
omits substantiating
evidence.
0.0 pts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeDiscuss
initiatives that
will address the
needs of the
community.
Completely discusses
initiatives that will
address the needs of the
community
demonstrating mastery
of the concepts and
provides substantiating
evidence.
50.0 pts
Accurately discusses
initiatives that will
address the needs of
the community and
partial substantiating
evidence is
presented.
38.0 pts
Partially discusses
initiatives that will
address the needs of
the community but
important components
are missing or omits
substantiating
evidence.
25.0 pts
Discussion of
initiatives that will
address the needs of
the community is
inaccurate or
incomplete and
substantiating
evidence is missing.
0.0 pts
50.0 p
ts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeInclude a
marketing
strategy for the
community, staff
and physicians
Marketing strategy for
the community, staff
and physicians is
accurate,
demonstrates clarity
of thought, and
understanding of all
concepts.
Substantiating
evidence is provided
for each.
50.0 pts
Marketing
strategy for the
community, staff
and physicians is
accurate but offers
partial
substantiating
evidence.
38.0 pts
Marketing strategy for the
community, staffMarketing
strategy for the community,
staff and physicians is
present but omits or
incorrectly describes an
important component or
omits substantiating
evidence. and physicians is
present but omits or
incorrectly describes an
important component or
omits substantiating
evidence.
25.0 pts
Marketing strategy
for the community,
staff and physicians
is incomplete,
inaccurate and
missing critical
components.
Substantiating
evidence is lacking.
0.0 pts
50.0 p
ts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeDescribe
how to monitor
the success of the
Describes how to
monitor the success of
the plan completely,
accurately and with
depth and breadth.
Provides substantiating
Describes how to
monitor the success of
the plan, but minor
flows in reasoning are
present or provides
partial substantiating
Does not describe
how to monitor the
success of the plan
and omits
substantiating
evidence.
Does not describe
how to monitor the
success of the plan
and omits
substantiating
evidence.
50.0 p
ts

Course Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
plan. evidence.
50.0 pts
evidence.
38.0 pts
25.0 pts 0.0 pts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcom
ePresentation to
the Company
Provides a clear,
accurate, well-
supported
explanation of the
vision and mission
statement and
motivation of
employees;
completely explains
the strategic plan and
justifies choices
made. Addresses the
Board of Directors
using effective
presentation skills
50.0 pts
Provides an explanation
of the vision and mission
statement and motivation
of employees, but omits
minor components of the
explanation for the
strategic plan or a
justification for the
choices made. Addresses
the Board of Directors
using effective
presentation skills, but
may have room for some
improvement.
38.0 pts
Provides a partial
explanation of the
vision and mission
statement and
motivation of
employees, and/or
omits critical
components of the
explanation for the
strategic plan and
justification for the
choices made.
Addresses the Board
of Directors using
partially effective
presentation skills.
25.0 pts
Provides only a
partial explanation
of the vision and
mission statement
and motivation of
employees, and
omits part of the
explanation for the
strategic plan or a
justification for the
choices made.
Presentation skills
are ineffective.
0.0 pts
50.0 p
ts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcom
ePresentation to
the Company
Provides 12-15 slides of
complete, accurate
content, a title and
reference slide and
comprehensive speaker
notes.
50.0 pts
Provides 12-15
slides of content,
but may omit some
needed details in
the slides or
speaker notes.
38.0 pts
Provides less than 12
slides and may omit a
title slide or reference
slide or require more
detail in the speaker
notes.
25.0 pts
Provides less than 12
slides and omits
critical information.
Speaker notes are
missing or incomplete.
0.0 pts
50.0 p
ts
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
Outcom
eOrganization,
usage,
mechanics,
grammar,
spelling, sentence
The paper is
basically error free in
terms of mechanics
and grammar. Ideas
are clearly presented
in a logical manner.
Language and word
choice is precise,
appropriate for the
audience, indicates
Writing follows
conventions of spelling
and grammar throughout.
Errors are infrequent and
do not interfere with
readability or
comprehension. Word
choice and language
indicates appropriate
understanding of the
Errors in spelling and
grammar exist that
somewhat interfere
with readability
and/or
comprehension.
Word choice and
language indicates a
basic understanding
of concepts; most
Writing contains
numerous errors in
spelling, grammar,
and/or sentence
structure that
severely interferes
with readability and
comprehension.
Word choice and
language indicates an
50.0 p
ts

Course Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
structure, style
and APA elements
scholastic
understanding of the
concepts, and all
terms are used
appropriately APA
format, is accurate;
paraphrased, quoted,
and cited throughout
the paper where
appropriate
50.0 pts
concepts, and all terms are
used appropriately.APA
format is used, accurately;
paraphrased, quoted, and
cited in many spots
throughout when
appropriate.Only minor
errors are present.
38.0 pts
terms are used
appropriately. APA
format is attempted
to paraphrase, quote,
and cite, but errors
are significant.
25.0 pts
unclear
understanding of
concepts; many
terms are used
inappropriately, No
attempt at APA
format.
0.0 pts
Total Points: 500.0