CRIMINAL LAW 2
Mike is charged to have committed grievous bodily harm pursuant to section 320 of the
criminal code. This is after he thrusts a fork into Sam’s abdomen on his 40th birthday while they
were both celebrating in Mike’s party where they were both consumed 12 beers. Mike’s action is
after Sam’s joke in which he tells Mike that his wife and child have been killed in a car accident
then later informs Mike that it was a joke.
Mike can be defended based on the fact that; he underwent involuntary intoxication.
Involuntary intoxication is the occurrence where the person is forced to intoxication to the extent
they cannot reason their actions1. According to section 28 (1), a person is not criminally
responsible for an act that is committed in a state where their mind is disordered by intoxication
or stupefaction caused by drugs or any other means that deprives the person from understanding
or controlling their action.
The defense could look into the effect of Sam’s joke of bad news to Mike, the joke mad
Mike to be in a state of shock which was seen in his actions of screaming. In this condition Mike
was intoxicated through stupefaction which is shock and astonishment2. At the time when Sam
was apologizing it could be assumed that Mike was still in this state therefore not being able to
understand or control his actions and that is why he took the fork and stabbed Sam on his
abdomen. In this case Mike pursuant to s28 (1) in relation to s27(1) is not guilty.
1 Quilter, J., & McNamara, L. (2018). The meaning of “intoxication” in
Australian criminal cases: Origins and operation. New Criminal Law Review: In
International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 170-207.
2 Mullins, G. (2017). Drunk and Delirious Defenses: Intoxication and Insanity in
the Criminal Code (WA).

+13062052269

info@desklib.com

Criminal Law

Contribute Materials

Related Documents