Criminal Law Exam

CRIMINAL LAW EXAM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. The legal duty to act in UK criminal law....................................................................................1
2. Elements needed for someone to be liable of theft......................................................................1
3. Success of Fraud Act 2006 in improving the law on criminal fraud in the United Kingdom.....2
4. Ways in which jury service and the jury system works in the United Kingdom.........................2
5. Ways in which actus reus element of causation works................................................................3
6. The offence of murder in English criminal law...........................................................................3
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................5

1. The legal duty to act in UK criminal law
For the most part there is no criminal obligation for neglecting to act in a specific
circumstance. On the off chance that there was to be discount risk for exclusion would be
compelled to change our activities and plans to forestall results that happen because of another
person's conduct. The offended party should demonstrate: that there is an obligation in the
conditions to take care obligation of care. that the conduct or inaction of the litigant in the
conditions didn't full fill the guideline of care which a sensible individual would meet in the
conditions. As in the hospital there is being physical cases that have been fail act for government
and people who are working in that cases that have been affected by the high level of the people
for their having the better future development. In some large part it being because there is no
more further distinction to the common law along with this court also rescue their some general
activities (Can a failure to act make someone guilty in the eyes of the law?, 2017). under s 6 of
the Road Traffic Act 1988, it is a criminal offense for an individual, without sensible pardon, to
neglect to give an example of breath when needed to do as such. Every one of these kinds of
relationship force some sort of obligation on one another, and subsequently an inability to act
and forestall an activity which prompts one of the gatherings turning into a casualty of some kind
of wrongdoing will connect a criminal risk.
2. Elements needed for someone to be liable of theft
According to Theft Act, 1968 (TA), a person is guilty of theft if they dishonestly use
someone else property that belong to others with the intention of permanently depriving the other
of it, then in such case it is considered as stealing. As per this act maximum penalty of Theft is
for seven years imprisonment (Taylor and Ó Floinn, 2020). As per this act any kind of stealing
done with the intention of gaining the property wrongfully is considered as theft. In order to
prove someone whether they are liable of theft, following elements are required to be considered.
Some of them are:
 Wrongful taking: Court is required to provide that the alleged thief had no right to the
property he took.
 Carrying Away: It is required to be proved that alleged thief took someone else’s property
away to another location not just to another room or in backyard.
 Personal property: Items that were taken were should be tangible or physical items that
belong to someone else property. It cannot be an intellectual or digital property.
1