Assignment on Criminal Procedure

Running head: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Criminal Procedure
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
1. According to the facts the legal profession privileges has defines the protection of the
communication between the solicitor and their clients who make promised to never
disclosed any information regarding to the works. The privilege helps to protects the legal
principle for the individual person for their ability to access the justice system by
disclosing every information. In Canada Solicitor–client privilege define as a common
law evidentiary principle which always makes it recognizable as a substantive rule which
always get protected through the constitution (Garland, 2014).
According to Justice Lamer the solicitor–client privilege always explain the confidentiality of
communication under some circumstances where communication can be disclosed without the
client's consent. Without the permission of the law the legitimate exercise of a right make the
appearance through the interference of another person’s right where the communication with the
solicitor should be confidential and must not make any conflict with the confidentiality. The law
provides the authority under some condition and when it has been provided to someone it holds
the rights of interference with confidentiality. The decision which has been taken must make the
choice of means of exercising and the authority make the determination with the decision for not
interfering with confidentiality (Murphy, 2015).
2. According to the test on communication of privilege it defines a rule of evidence which
helps to protects from disclosure in court documents or communications made for the
dominant purpose of litigation: Two factual determinations must be made to assess
whether litigation privilege attaches to a document and it arises several queries like was
litigation in reasonable prospect at the time the document was produced or what was the
dominant purpose for its production? The test has been found in the case of Dos Santos
v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 2005. In the case of Physicians of British