Criminology

Explore the field of criminology with Desklib's collection of articles and resources. Learn about the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 and its impact on the criminal justice system. Find annotated bibliographies, CV examples, and more.

Running head: CRIMINOLOGY
Criminology

CRIMINOLOGY 2
Table of Contents
Task 2: Annotated bibliography............................................................................................................3
Task 3: CV for an ideal graduate position.............................................................................................9
References...........................................................................................................................................14

CRIMINOLOGY 3
Task 2: Annotated bibliography
Article 1: Griffin, S. and Moran, J., 2010. Accountability for deaths attributable to the
gross negligent act or omission of a police force: The impact of the corporate
manslaughter and corporate homicide act 2007. The Journal of Criminal Law, 74(4),
pp.358-381.
This source evaluates potential effects of corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide
Act 2007 (CMCHA) with reference to application of act to the police force for death.
Because, this act focuses on gross negligent act as well as the omission of police officers.
This source would focus on responsibility of police force and organizational authority and
makes comparison between earlier act and CMCHA. It also defines that legislative
innovation is considered for performing the accountability of police force such as death in
police custody. This source illustrates that the responsibility of police force cannot be
extended effectively by CMCHA (Griffin, and Moran, 2010).
Article 2: Almond, P., 2007. Regulation Crisis: Evaluating the Potential Legitimizing
Effects of “Corporate Manslaughter” Cases. Law & Policy, 29(3), pp.285-310.
This source illustrates new way for evaluation of proposed crime of corporate manslaughter.
This source is considered because, it focuses on work-related fatality case regarding
legitimacy aspect and permits to collect the higher knowledge regarding the significance and
potential advantageous related to reforming the regulation. It is illustrated that work-related
fatality cases may intrinsic the authority as signal offenses. A failure of dealing the case in
way that satisfies interest regarding publics can create challenges for H&S manager to lead
the crisis situation. Along with this, reforming regulation for obtaining favourable responses
can provide significant valid advantageous for the regulator (homicide act, 2007).

CRIMINOLOGY 4
Article 3: Doyle, D.M. and Scott, S., 2016. Criminal Liability for Deaths in Prison
Custody: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. The Howard
Journal of Crime and Justice, 55(3), pp.295-311.
This source illustrates the provision related to Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate
Homicide Act 2007 that have been mistreated through criminologists as well as legal
scholars. It applies the regulation regarding death in custody. This source exemplifies that
verifying the responsibility related to prison relies on the senior management in act. It could
demonstrate issues related to developing fault regarding corporate authority in common law
recognition approach as well as senior management test can invalidate to intent of Section 2
(1) (d). It may also weaken the capacity regarding Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for
convicting the custodial of preventable death in custody (Doyle, and Scott, 2016).
Article 4: Gobert, J., 2008. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act
2007–Thirteen years in the making but was it worth the wait?. The Modern Law Review,
71(3), pp.413-433.
This source evaluates that in spite of the development period lengthen over 13 years, the
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 can be distressed. This source
can be included because it defines CMCHA can be restricted in context of scope as well as
restricted to the range with reference to possible perpetrators. Together with, it is regressive
to level that discredited recognition doctrine was before it. This source also emphasizes the
prevention of systemic error to individual errors. Consequently, the act cannot curb kind of
imprudent uncertainty management judgment, which may lead to death regarding innocent
employees, customers as well as members of public. In addition, this source illustrated that
by requiring the DPP consent in terms of prosecuting, the act can pressurize for entangling
the corporate manslaughter prosecution in the political procedure for the unacceptable degree.
This source also demonstrated that in spite of these faults, symbolic implication regarding

CRIMINOLOGY 5
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 can eventually go beyond its
methodological shortage (Gobert, 2008).
Article 5: Price, L., 2015. Finding fault in organizations –reconceptualizing the role of
senior managers in corporate manslaughter. Legal Studies, 35(3), pp.385-407.
This source illustrates that Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
claimed to avoid recognition of doctrine within the legitimately organizational model with
respect to corporate liability. There is uncertainty, but, that persistent of top management
involvement in corporate manslaughter will decline act for performing no over misconduct in
reference to the aggregating person. These strategies will not succeed in both terms such as
including the responsibility of company as greater than a set of persons and provides
significant techniques related to the prosecution of large companies (Price, 2015).
This source exemplifies that the requirement of senior management cannot be evaluated as
emphasizing the persons, however, a company can impose their workforces on an
authoritative working system. In a larger company, organizational structure is inherent,
evaluating the meaning as well as the value of what workforces observe boundaries as well as
navigation of their performance. These structures can be created through involvement
associated with senior manager, whose role as well as rank within the company makes
competent for contributing to the progress of company structure. This source examines that
by inconsistency related to entailment of these company evaluator and planners, the 2007 act
can be considered to focus on an organizational role in corporate manslaughter and
addressing truly corporate responsibility (Price, 2015).
Article 6: Corporate Manslaughter. 2018. Legal Guidance, Violent crime.
This source demonstrates that corporate manslaughter is a crime developed by section 1 in
reference to Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. This source
illustrates CMCHA was forced in 2008. The offense was generated to make sure those

CRIMINOLOGY 6
corporations as well as, other businesses can keep accountable for severe failing resulting in
the case of death. This source illustrated that the offense regarding gross negligence
manslaughter can be eliminated because it is related to corporations as well as other
businesses.
This source depicts that Corporate Manslaughter has a wider scope as compared to earlier
common law offense. It continues for applying the most serious company failing. There could
be high threshold regarding liability that requires proof regarding gross breach of appropriate
duty of care. But, it cannot be required for a longer period to demonstrate that a person who
was controlling the company was individually accountable regarding the crime.
This source evaluates that under 2007 act, offense regarding company Manslaughter is
related to way where, feasible activities were organized and managed during the organization.
This source has a wider focus like overall management related to health and safety, the
selection and employees training, the executive of system to work and the staff supervision
can be focused.
Along with this, the source defines that company cannot be liable when the failures were
completely at lower level. Furthermore, failing of senior authority should develop substantial
factor in breach. But, failure at the top level does not create a breach of duty. In this source, it
is identified that liability for the offense can be evaluated by looking at failing of company as
a whole. The trial should confirm that breach of duty was contributing to death. This source
demonstrated that whether breach is made beyond minimal contribution with respect to death.
Since, defendant is a regulatory authority; hence penalty should be adequate. This source
depicts that the court has power for creating the ancillary order such as remedial and publicity
order. Along with this, definitive sentencing instruction is published through sentencing
assembly which has created their effects on 1st February 2016. It is evaluated that the

CRIMINOLOGY 7
sentence level will rely on organizational size. In addition, the sentence range will be
specified as £180,000 to £20 million.
This source examines that the Corporate Manslaughter is only demonstrating the offense. In
Wales and England, the proceeding cannot be instituted in spite of consent regarding director
related to public prosecutions. It also addressed that every top prosecutor can provide
agreement as well as, it can be suggested that file can be endorsed by particular situation
regarding agreement associated with section 17 of an act. This source exemplifies that cases
that can provide outcome related to measures for corporate manslaughter with the resistance
regarding circumstances entailing independent partnership. It could be defined as a distinctive
crime unit, special crime as well as counter-terrorism sector (Corporate Manslaughter, 2018).
Article 7: International alert 2008. UK Corporate Manslaughter Act Introduces New
Liabilities.
This source illustrates that companies that have U.K exposure may face new possible
accountability as of 2008, after showing impact of Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate
Homicide Act 2007 in UK. The regulation is created the new offense regarding corporate
manslaughter. It may influence both private and public sector companies with some
exemption. The source examines that most entities can more easily be accused in the context
of gross breach related to duty of care consequences in death of an individual. These breaches
can occur with regard to health and safety issues and supply of products with services. This
source demonstrates that transformation in liability can generate the gap in coverage in some
approaches (International alert, 2008).
Article 8: Hopwood, A.D., Edum-Fotwe, F.T., and Adams, F.K., 2019. The Impact of
the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 on the Construction
Industry in the UK.

CRIMINOLOGY 8
This source illustrates that Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
demonstrated its effects in 2008. The regulation demonstrates criminal liabilities of the
corporation as well as, creates it informal for sue them in which failures of severe health and
safety management is prone to fatalities at the workplace. Furthermore, source is aimed to
address provision regarding new act as well as assesses its significance and impact for
construction stakeholders as well as the potential effect on existing industry activities in
construction. It identifies socio-economic effects on an act as well as fatalities in a broadway
(Hopwood, et. al., 2019).

CRIMINOLOGY 9
Task 3: CV for an ideal graduate position
Nicoleta Andreea Slatineanu
Address: 46 Dersingham Avenue, E12 5QE, London
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
PROFILE
I am looking forward to finishing my studies and learning new skills .
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Art History
Statford School Academy
Waltham Forest College
Travel and Tourism Level 3 and Level 2
Exploring Aviation Industry Level 1 BTEC
Arden University
BA (Hons) Criminology and Psychology
EXPERIENCE
Little Butterflies Day Nursery
 Playing with children and building a strong relationship with them
 Supervising children at times
 Organizing activities and programmes
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Beauty Base- Customer Service Team Member
 Dealing with customers inquiries
 Dealing with complaints
 Taking payment and dealing with cash/card payments
June 2016
2016-2018
Present
February
2015
September 2016- September 2017

CRIMINOLOGY 10
 Entering guests information onto a computer database
Sports Direct– Retail Assistant
 Assisted with a placement of orders, refunds or exchanges
 Dealt with complaints
 Go the extra mile to engage customers
 Followed communication procedures, policies, and guidelines
 Contributed to team effort
 Informed customers of deals and promotions
Rail Traders Ltd– Office Administrator
 Answer calls, emails and look after visitors
 Draft, formats, and print relevant documents
 Greeting clients and visitors
 Filling papers and typing documents
 Order office supplies and other necessary stuff
SKILLS
Computer: Microsoft Excel, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, and Macromedia
Flash
Languages: Romanian (mother tongue), English (fluent) and Spanish (basic)
Health: No smoking, Driving License Provisional
INTERESTS AND ACTIVITIES
Make-up, Shopping, Cooking and baking, Listening to music, and Swimming
November 2017-May 2018
May 2018 – December 2018

CRIMINOLOGY 11
Reflective statement
Last week, I have participated in the Interdisciplinary Study module that helps to enhance my
personal and professional career. Throughout this module, I learned that interdisciplinary
study permits the student for learning by making a connection between ideas as well as
concepts in across different disciplinary limits (Logofatu, et. al., 2017). This learning was
beneficial for me to apply the understanding gained in one area to another as a mode of
deepening learning. I have learned that branching in the new sector can create my creativity,
critical thinking as well as CV. Along with this; interdisciplinary activity gains my listening
competencies, empathy for social and ethical concern and creating the perception of bias.
This module was beneficial for me to increase my critical skills and also enables me to ask
more sophisticated questions with the customers. This interdisciplinary module also supports
me for creating new links between opinions as well as evidence in a contrasting sector and it
also supports me produce a more sophisticated answer (Neff, et. al., 2019). These skills will
not only improve my academic performance but also enhance my employability skills.
Throughout the module, I have generated my knowledge that I should question with own
thought procedures. I have observed that when I begin performing in a group that mix student
to different departments, then be prepared to question their own thinking. Along with this, I
have pointed out that the interdisciplinary module supports me to observe the things that are
easily taken for granted through specific disciplines. I have learned that course content that
may appear clear to some students could be complex for others due to the disparity in the
disciplinary training. It is identified that the interdisciplinary module may take time for
accumulating and developing new ideas through a different piece of knowledge (de Oliveira,
et. al., 2015). This would be beneficial for improving my personal as well as professional
career.

CRIMINOLOGY 12
For another level four modules, I have pointed out that communication with students as well
as academic employees from other fields can be a significant part of the learning experience.
Along with this, it is addressed that learning to conveying the complicated ideas is significant
skills hence, different employers are requesting evidence of excellent verbal with written
communication skills in packs of a job application. This understanding would be applied by
me to apply for a graduate position. I have also focused that interdisciplinary work is required
communicating to different audiences across the different subject fields. Along with this, I
have learned that interdisciplinary work requires communicating with different audiences
across the different subject fields. This improving communication skill would assist in studies
more commonly (Brand, et. al., 2019).
Throughout the module, I have learned that questioning skills are a key part for improving the
communication skills that are required for interdisciplinary work as well as useful career
proficiency while moving towards new employment. I have gained my understanding that
while I will move into a new field, I may face struggle initially in order to comprehend
aspects and clarify the vocabulary that other scholars appear to take for granted. In this
situation, I would not feel discourage and thinks to catch up on the line.
Covering letter in support of an application for the graduate position
Nicoleta Andreea Slatineanu
46 Dersingham Avenue, E12 5QE,
London | 07305768599| [e-mail]
Graduate School Support Team
Floor 5, Waterloo Bridge Wing, FWB,
150 Stamford Street
London SE1 9NH

CRIMINOLOGY 13
[phone]
King’s College London
RE: Application for the Graduate position 05/04/2019
Graduate School Support Team,
I am writing to apply for the study of graduation listed on your school’s website. With over 2
years of experience in academics and professional support, I possess the broad skill set and
understanding required to get a higher outcome. Please review the given below highlights
from my attached CV:
 BA (Hons) Criminology and Psychology (Present)
 Excellent communication skills
 Extensive experience regarding Microsoft Excel, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft
Word, and Macromedia Flash
The deep of experience I can provide in team is a great fit for Graduate position. I look
forward to opportunity to highly learn in at King’s College as I can contribute my strengths to
get opportunity.
I appreciate your taking time to review my experience and credentials.
Sincerely,
Nicoleta Andreea Slatineanu

CRIMINOLOGY 14
References
Almond, P., 2007. Regulation Crisis: Evaluating the Potential Legitimizing Effects of
“Corporate Manslaughter” Cases. Law & Policy, 29(3), pp.285-310.
Brand, B.D., Schlegel, M. and McMullin-Messier, P., 2019. “Map Your Hazards!”:
Assessing Hazards, Vulnerability, and Risk Through an Active Learning-Based Educational
Module. In Interdisciplinary Teaching About Earth and the Environment for a Sustainable
Future (pp. 213-231). USA: Springer, Cham.
Corporate Manslaughter. 2018. Legal Guidance, Violent crime. [Online]. Available at:
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/corporate-manslaughter (Accessed: 05 April 2019).
de Oliveira, C.A.M., de França Carvalho, C.P., Céspedes, I.C., de Oliveira, F. and Le Sueur‐
Maluf, L., 2015. Peer mentoring program in an interprofessional and interdisciplinary
curriculum in Brazil. Anatomical sciences education, 8(4), pp.338-347.
Doyle, D.M. and Scott, S., 2016. Criminal Liability for Deaths in Prison Custody: The
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. The Howard Journal of Crime
and Justice, 55(3), pp.295-311.
Gobert, J., 2008. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007–Thirteen
years in the making but was it worth the wait?. The Modern Law Review, 71(3), pp.413-433.
Griffin, S. and Moran, J., 2010. Accountability for deaths attributable to the gross negligent
act or omission of a police force: The impact of the corporate manslaughter and corporate
homicide act 2007. The Journal of Criminal Law, 74(4), pp.358-381.
Hopwood, A.D., Edum-Fotwe, F.T., and Adams, F.K., 2019. The Impact of the Corporate
Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 on the Construction Industry in the UK.
[Online]. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268427502_The_Impact_of_the_Corporate_Mansla

CRIMINOLOGY 15
ughter_and_Corporate_Homicide_Act_2007_on_the_Construction_Industry_in_the_UK
(Accessed: 05 April 2019).
International alert 2008. UK Corporate Manslaughter Act Introduces New Liabilities.
[Online]. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?
sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=20&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwisoKq707D
hAhWIinAKHbrMAJw4ChAWMAl6BAgDEAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.willis.com
%2FDocuments%2FPublications%2FServices%2FInternational
%2F2008%2FIntl_Alert_UK_Manslaughter_Act.pdf&usg=AOvVaw36KRunyWUDxwrFhX
JlqzFM (Accessed: 05 April 2019).
Logofatu, D., Lämmlein, B., Andersson, C. and Goldenthal, G., 2017, April. Prospective
engineers and children's literature—An unusual approach to teach key competencies: An
interdisciplinary module. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference
(EDUCON) (pp. 607-612). IEEE.
Neff, J., Holmes, S.M., Strong, S., Chin, G., De Avila, J., Dubal, S., Duncan, L.G., Halpern,
J., Harvey, M., Knight, K.R. and Lemay, E., 2019. The Structural Competency Working
Group: Lessons from Iterative, Interdisciplinary Development of a Structural Competency
Training Module. In Structural Competency in Mental Health and Medicine (pp. 53-74).
USA: Springer, Cham.
Price, L., 2015. Finding fault in organisations–reconceptualising the role of senior managers
in corporate manslaughter. Legal Studies, 35(3), pp.385-407.