Critical Analysis Essay 2022

SID:
Word count: 1,300 Essay only (not including the template and reference
list)
ENG5811 CRITICAL ANALYSIS ESSAY
LITERATURE ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK
Citation Brief
Overview
Line of
argument Research
Methods
Limitations
& critique
Recommendati
ons
(Savolainen,
Ahonen and
Richardson,
2012)
The author
provides
supplier
perspectiv
e on
project
failure.
The
authors
proposed
different
criteria for
assessing
project
success
and
failure.
The authors
used a
qualitative
assessment
to analyze
factors.
The paper
examines
only seven
articles and
the
research.
The authors
recommend in-
depth research
on the supplier
perspective.
(Sage, Dainty
and Brookes,
2014)
The
authors
assess
four
different
perspectiv
es of
project
failure.
The
author
proactivel
y declares
factor for
the failure
of
constructi
on
projects in
the United
Kingdom.
The authors
execute
qualitative
research
with of
project
managers in
UK
construction
companies.
The
research
pertains to a
specific
group of
managers.
The authors
recommend
research on
different
domains of
project
parameters.
(Gupta et al.,
2019)
The
proposed
work
provides
project
monitoring
and
success
assessme
nt.
The
authors
use a
systemati
c review
of project
assessme
nt models.
The authors
use the
Systematic
review
methodology
on journal
articles.
The
proposed
work
highlights
journal
articles from
an
electronic
database till
2016.
The author
recommends
models project
failure
prediction
models.

(Albert, Balve
and Spang,
2017)
The paper
presents
stakeholde
rs take on
project
success
and failure.
The
authors
highlight
factors of
project
success.
A conceptual
methodology
is
implemented
based on
recent
journal
articles.
The authors
face the
limitation of
digitally
available
papers.
The authors
recommend
assessment
models for
project success.
(Adebisi, Ojo
and Alao,
2018)
The paper
highlights
factors for
the failure
to execute
multi-story
buildings in
Nigeria.
The
authors
provide
empirical
data for
the
Nigerian
constructi
on
company.
The
researchers
use
descriptive
quantitative
methodology
in conducting
surveys and
questionnair
es through
Nigerian
contractors.
The authors
conduct 243
questionnair
es in Lagos
State of
Nigeria.
The authors
recommend risk
assessment
and financial
implications of
multi-storey
buildings.
(Lehtinen et
al., 2014)
The author
highlights
relationshi
ps of
factors of
failure in
software
projects.
The
authors
determine
d the flaw
in
software
project
failure
related to
processes
.
The authors
use
quantitative
methodology
for project
failures in
different
companies.
The
research-
based
purely on
data
collected
from four
software
product
companies.
The authors
recommend
statistical
analysis of
heavy data and
empirical
analysis of
complex
mechanisms in
software project
processes.
(Taherdoost
and
Keshavarzsal
eh, 2016)
The paper
targets key
factors that
account for
the failure
and
success of
projects in
a global
marketplac
e.
The
authors
highlight
the flaw in
recent
research
on project
failures.
The authors
use the
theoretical
methodology
to propose a
framework
for analyzing
project
success and
failure
factors from
a global
perspective.
The
proposed
work lacks
statistical
analysis of
the extent of
factors
affecting the
project
execution
process.
The authors
provide success
factors for
project
execution are
provided for
organizations.
(Montequin, The The The authors The survey The authors

Cousillas,
Alvarez and
Villanueva,
2016)
authors
examine
observer
perspectiv
e of
managers
on project
success
and failure.
authors
derive
patterns
of cause
on the
success
and
failures of
the
projects in
eyes of
the
managers
.
use
quantitative
research
methodology
with surveys
and
questionnair
es.
is deployed
on LinkedIn
to 36
different
project
managemen
t groups.
recommend to
extend the
analysis on
proposed
methods.
(Antony and
Gupta, 2019)
The author
proposes
ten
reasons of
failure of
process
improveme
nt projects.
Failure of
projects
incur huge
cost
losses,
therefore,
the
authors
provide
ten
reasons
with
remedy
analysis
to
incorporat
e the
issue.
The research
is qualitative
with
extensive
review of
literature and
case studies.
The review
presented in
research is
mainly
bases on
author
reviews and
managemen
t
professional
s.
The research
must be
extended to
surveys and
journal reviews
for more in-
depth analysis.
(Navandar, Bari
and Gaikwad,
2021)
The author
discusses
failure
factors for
private and
governmen
t and
constructio
n firms in a
developing
country.
A
compariso
n between
private
and
governme
nt
constructi
on firms is
the main
motivation
of
research.
Quantitative
analysis is
selected for
the research.
The analysis
is done on
some
government
and private
firms of
India.
The work
presented helps
contruction
policy makers in
minimizing
project failures.
DRAWING ON THEORY AND EVIDENCE, CRITICALLY ANALYSE THE CLAIM AND
ITS IMPLICATIONS THAT THE PERCEIVED CAUSES OF PROJECT FAILURE WILL
VARY DEPENDING ON THE WAY THE FAILURE IS ASSESSED