RPL Assessment Article 2022

RPL assessment
Name
Assignment
Professor
Date

Article: Hamdani, Y., Ary, A. and Lunsky, Y., 2017. Critical analysis of a population mental
health strategy: Effects on stigma for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(2), pp.144-161.
Introduction
The objective of this paper is to critically analyses and review the various methodologies used to
oversee mental health care. Underpinning this particular point is a peer-reviewed article
involving stigmatizing issues among nurses and patients in mental health care. The article's
literature review utilized systematic methodologies that explains how different structures are
being used and experienced. Reacting deliberately to strategy, legislative issues, and current
issues, various methodologies exist together without a clear view concerning whether they are
helpful instruments. Typically, nursing experience to date recommends that reasonable exercises
can be learned before nursing practices become all the more generally embraced across well-
being networks.
According to this article, stigma is broadly recognized as an issue influencing the well-being and
prosperity of individuals with scholarly and formative incapacities, and those with mental
challenges. To address this issue, a populace psychological well-being system, which involves a
concentration for lessening stigma and segregation ought to be developed (Bauer et al
2020,p.19).Drawing on a basic and critical policy analysis approach, this particular article
literally examined how nurses addressed the stigma and mental illness. It also offers the required
implications for people with such mental illness. The article analysis has diverse results as it
revealed the key understanding of exclusion and how various perspectives shape the given issues
of stigma and discrimination that are related to psychological problems.

These certain understandings have moulded the immediate course of action needed (e.g.,
psychological wellness advancement and against disgrace programs). These may have
constructive outcomes (e.g., aptitudes for dealing with one's own emotional well-being,
diminished separation identified with dysfunctional behaviour).However, the article may have
unintended antagonistic results (e.g., the shame of being unique and doing not quite the same as
individuals without IDD as well as psychological instability, and not having the option to help
oneself). The author is precise and gives hope to readers (Fontana,2019,p.76). This is through
indicating that Acknowledging the discrimination issues and underlining different methods for
taking an interest and increasing autonomy on societies that are not dominatingly centred around
autonomy is vital. Conversely, efficiency can lower the stigma experienced by patients with
mental illness, improve the nurse's skills and experiences and optimizing health care strategies.
Strengths of the article
The authors qualitative and quantitive data is detailed enough in order to contribute to enhancing
nursing professional future practice. As indicated by the author, Deciphering the outcomes of the
review, survey, instructive and contact-based activities to diminish this issue ought to be at the
focal point of evidence-based emotional well-being nursing practice (Jerdana et al 2018,p.34).
The article research evidence demonstrates that nursing education is progressively successful in
decreasing stigma views in patients
The authors have done a great job in incorporating evidence-based anti-stigma interventions in
the nursing practice domain. This has been accomplished by drawing on various research models
that help in lowering the challenges. This can urge nurses to build up a particular way of thinking
of nursing practise that is against bias and quite empowering. This is due to unbiased
philosophical data provided in the article. (Lyndon et al 2019,p.256). Given that vilification is