Critical Analysis of Ethical and Legal Dimensions of Workplace Diversity in HR Management
Verified
Added on 2023/01/18
|23
|1728
|53
Presentation
AI Summary
This presentation critically analyzes the ethical and legal dimensions of workplace diversity in human resource management. It explores the challenges and benefits of diversity management and provides recommendations for organizations. The research is based on a literature review, survey data, and interviews with managers.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Critical analysis of the ethical and legal dimensions of workplace diversity in Human Resource Management Name of the Student Name of the University
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Introduction-Background InthiseraofglobalisationEvery Organisation is Diverse Diversityimpliessexual,racial,social, ethnic and other diversity Diversity management is a major ethical concern LegalobligationsandRulesarethe pathway
Problem Statement Lack of diversity acceptance Discrimination and Biased culture Culturally incompetent workplace culture High Turnover Lack of employee engagement Legal objections Workforce complains
Introduction-Purpose Finding the relevance of ethical and legal dimensions in accommodatingaculturallydiverseworkplacethat ultimately helps in gaining competitive advantage and market sustainability. For better comprehension of the study ethical and legal dimensions are separated and each is considered for discussion individually.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Introduction-Objectives To evaluate the legal dimensions that are required for accommodating a diverse workforce from the perspective of a human resource manager. Tounderstandtheethicaldimensionsofaccommodatingadiverse workforce from the perspective of a human resource manager. Toreviewthelegislativemeasurespriortotheaccommodationofa diverse workforce. To review the ethical dimensions prior to the accommodation of a diverse workforce. To understand the problems that a human resource manager might face while accommodating a diverse workforce.
Introduction- Significance •Provide an actual scenario of legal and ethical dimensions of workplace diversity in an organization. •Provide direction of how effectiveness of policy implementation •Examine challenges and issues can be mitigated holistically. •Better understanding of the various areas a HR manager
Introduction- Structure Chapte r 1•Introduction Chapte r 2•Literature Review Chapte r 3•Methodology Chapte r 4•Results and Analysis Chapte r 5•Conclusion and Recommendations
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Literature Review •Reviewing Articles •Reviewing previous researches •Reviewing previous published reports •Reviewing books •Reviewing online resource
Literature Review – Points Covered •Theoretical support •Issues in workplace diversity management •Evaluation and review of the Ethical dimensions from the perspective of a human resource manager •Gaps in legal dimensions in diverse workforce and impact on business
Literature Review – Summary Diversityactuallyenrichesthecompanycultureand increaselongtermsustainabilityoftheorganization.The ethical climate is associated with different positive attitudes towardswork,suchascommitmenttoorganizationandjob satisfaction.ThecorefunctionalitiesofHumanresource management include job design and analysis, recruitment and selection,workforceplanning,traininganddevelopment, performancemanagement,compensationandbenefitsand otherstatutoryandlegalaspectsmanagementinregardto employment.manyorganizationalpolicies,including promotion,developmentandplacement,createvarious psychologicalenvironmentsthatgeneratedifferentlevelsof turnover between organisations
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Methodology- Data Analysis •Quantitative Analysis •Descriptive and Co-relation Survey Data •Thematic Coding •QDA Interview Data •Thematic Qualitative Analysis Literature Review
Methodology- Ethical consideration Receiving consent from respondents Privacy and security of personal information Data Privacy Act
Survey Results – Correlation Correlations Experienc e Racio_ethnici ty Workplace_div ersity essentiality_div ersity_manage ment workplace_ discriminati on legal_enfo rcement ethical_cult ure Priority_Tr aining Priority_leg al_enforcem ent ExperiencePearson Correlation1-.196-.122.000.069-.120-.167.217.305* Sig. (2-tailed).174.3981.000.633.405.246.130.031 N505050505050505050 Racio_ethnicityPearson Correlation-.1961.600**.742**.594**-.605**-.644**-.420**.082 Sig. (2-tailed).174.000.000.000.000.000.002.572 N505050505050505050 Workplace_diversityPearson Correlation-.122.600**1.711**.384**-.265-.320*-.204-.094 Sig. (2-tailed).398.000.000.006.063.023.156.516 N505050505050505050 essentiality_diversity_ management Pearson Correlation.000.742**.711**1.829**-.610**-.722**-.375**.104 Sig. (2-tailed)1.000.000.000.000.000.000.007.474 N505050505050505050 workplace_discriminat ion Pearson Correlation.069.594**.384**.829**1-.618**-.576**-.207.018 Sig. (2-tailed).633.000.006.000.000.000.150.903 N505050505050505050 legal_enforcementPearson Correlation-.120-.605**-.265-.610**-.618**1.849**.217.027 Sig. (2-tailed).405.000.063.000.000.000.131.850 N505050505050505050 ethical_culturePearson Correlation-.167-.644**-.320*-.722**-.576**.849**1.544**-.271 Sig. (2-tailed).246.000.023.000.000.000.000.057 N505050505050505050 Priority_TrainingPearson Correlation.217-.420**-.204-.375**-.207.217.544**1-.475** Sig. (2-tailed).130.002.156.007.150.131.000.000 N505050505050505050 Priority_legal_enforce ment Pearson Correlation.305*.082-.094.104.018.027-.271-.475**1 Sig. (2-tailed).031.572.516.474.903.850.057.000 N505050505050505050 priority_leadership_aw areness Pearson Correlation.250-.432**-.198-.358*-.251.172.265.309*.121 Sig. (2-tailed).080.002.168.011.078.232.063.029.403 N505050505050505050 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Interview Results
Conclusion Equal Employment Opportunity laws and orders are less effective in organizations or is not given the right importance as needed to Role of strategic managers in supporting workplace ethics and integrity is immense. Most employees think Diversity Management is not important at all Discrimination in Workplace has become much disguised under hypocrisy making finding it very difficult.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Recommendations Collaborative awareness approach should be used through appropriate leadership strategy to make the employees aware of the discrimination issue in a very integrated format. Enforcement of stronger regulation and more strict governing policies should be ensured. Workforce training can be also very helpful in this case. Government should take significant part in it
Research Gap – Future Scope The results are not industry specific Less reliable and viable for all environment More legal and ethical dimensions could be researched InfutureCronbachalphatestcanbeusedforreliability testing Thesamplesizeoftheinterviewandthesurveycouldbe enlarged
References Ashikali, T. and Groeneveld, S., 2015. Diversity management for all? An empirical analysis of diversity management outcomes across groups.Personnel Review,44(5), pp.757-780. Barak, M.E.M., 2016.Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace. Sage Publications. Crane, A. and Matten, D., 2016.Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. D'Netto, B., Shen, J., Chelliah, J. and Monga, M., 2014. Human resource diversity management practices in the Australian manufacturing sector.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,25(9), pp.1243-1266. Hunt, V., Layton, D. and Prince, S., 2015. Diversity matters.McKinsey & Company,1, pp.15-29. Janssens, M. and Zanoni, P., 2014. Alternative diversity management: Organizational practices fostering ethnic equality at work.Scandinavian Journal of Management,30(3), pp.317-331. Kumar, R., 2019.Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage Publications Limited. Lachman,V.D.,2014.Ethicalissuesinthedisruptivebehaviorsofincivility,bullying,andhorizontal/lateral violence.Medsurg Nurs,23(1), pp.56-60. Mire,S.L.andOwens,R.,2014.APropitiousMoment:WorkplaceBullyingandRegulationoftheLegal Profession.UNSWLJ,37, p.1030. Nkomo, S. and Hoobler, J.M., 2014. A historical perspective on diversity ideologies in the United States: Reflections on human resource management research and practice.Human Resource Management Review,24(3), pp.245-257. Rose, S., Spinks, N. and Canhoto, A.I., 2014.Management research: Applying the principles. Routledge. Sabharwal,M.,2014.Isdiversitymanagementsufficient?Organizationalinclusiontofurtherperformance.Public Personnel Management,43(2), pp.197-217. Trittin,H.andSchoeneborn,D.,2017.Diversityaspolyphony:Reconceptualizingdiversitymanagementfroma communication-centered perspective.Journal of Business Ethics,144(2), pp.305-322. Van Thiel, S., 2014.Research methods in public administration and public management: an introduction. Routledge. Wrench, J., 2016.Diversity management and discrimination: Immigrants and ethnic minorities in the EU. Routledge. Zapata-Barrero, R., 2015. Diversity management in Spain: New dimensions, new challenges.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser