Critical Review of Literature

Running head: CRITICAL REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Critical Review of Literature
Student’s Name:
University:
Author’s note:

1
CRITICAL REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Performance management is considered as one of the main components of ensuring the
quality and productivity of an organization. It is generally carried out by the directors or the
managerial body, where they engage with the employees to review the daily progress and
development (Buckingham & Goodall, 2015). Generally, it is observed that an effective
performance management requires monitoring, feedback and assessment. It involves the analysis
of organizational success, learning from the mistakes and evaluation of potential growth. (Mone &
London, 2018)
There have been many deliberations regarding the effectiveness of performance
management and its basic requirement. Various scholars have proposed different methodology
and strategic components that can enhance this affectivity in question. Therefore, to understand
the basic concept of performance management, it is important to take note of different
approaches and standpoints regarding the issue. In the following section of the paper, two of
such articles, namely Performance management effectiveness: lessons from world-leading
firms by Michal Biron, Elaine Farndale & Jaap Paauwe and Performance management
effectiveness: practices or context? By Victor Y. Haines III & Sylvie St-Onge will be critically
analysed and discussed.
The following paper is a critical assessment of these two scholarly articles focusing on
the single issue: performance management. The analysis of both the articles requires critical
reading and examination. However, the aim of the paper is to identify the points where these
articles maintain unanimity, as well as differ on their claim. The purpose is to analyse the key
points and compare them with each other.

2
CRITICAL REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Performance management effectiveness: lessons from world-leading firms (Biron et al., 2011)
The main contention of the article is to examine the effectiveness of performance
management in the context of 16 leading firms of the world. It argues that the effectiveness of
performance management have been subject to several criticism and objections. However, these
objections have not discarded or nullified the merit of the said system, the authors argue. They
maintain that performance management has been a widely discussed and practised approach in
the global organization as the importance of human resource have been growing exponentially
and is understood as a significant role player in the context of organizational performance.
(Osmani, 2012)
The article further approaches to examine and assess the potency of performance
management using the case studies from those 16 firms. In doing so, they employ signalling
theory as the main framework. According to the authors, organizational practices can be
regarded as signals and can be applied to a wide range of issues such as job applicants,
shareholders, competitors and customers. However, these signals mostly are associated with the
external constituents. The internal signalling processes as such cannot be identified from a third
party perception. According to Saud (2016), Information asymmetry within an organization is
essential for strong signalling environment. The article further suggests that the firms use certain
strategies, organizational culture, values and goals to communicate with the employees and align
them with the company objective. It observes that this internal signalling process is a strategic
and tactical management tool that makes the employees aware of the company expectations and
in turn makes them feel valuable and respected by the company itself. They also propose a
framework involving four performance management facilitators. In conclusion, the article