Critical Thinking Skills: A Case Study
Added on 2021-02-21
14 Pages4807 Words98 Views
|
|
|
CRITICAL THINKINGSKILLS
Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................3PROJECT 1.....................................................................................................................................3Purpose of applying critical thinking skills.................................................................................3Claims, assertions and statements of the critical thinking skills.................................................3Evaluation of the ideas and development of valid arguments.....................................................5PROJECT 2.....................................................................................................................................7Use of logical reasoning for analysing the arguments.................................................................7Use of critical evaluation skills or validating the points..............................................................9Comment on producing the case study......................................................................................10CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................11REFERENCES................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTIONCritical Thinking skills are an important tool in determining the viewpoint presented andthen analysing it identifying its positive as well as negative aspects (Cottrell, 2017). In thecurrent report two different case studies have been taken which have then been evaluatedindividual in a critical manner identifying what are the positive aspects stated in the article andwhat are the negative aspects. Different aspects presented on this cases study will be evaluatedand using different skills these will be criticised to draw appropriate conclusions.MAIN BODYPROJECT 1Purpose of applying critical thinking skillsCritical thinking refers to the style of the thinking of the people and makes improvement on thethinking of the people. The purpose is better decision-making and get the better and positiveresults from that decisions. Critical thinking changes the way of thing of the people in the societyand brings better and good decisions related to the thinking of the people. The thinking of thepeople in the case study is had to be changed and developed over the community that every onegets the proper human rights and freedom of their choice. Critical thinking skills will improvethe democracy and provide proper protections to the rights of the people. These skills will helpsto maintain the legal charity in the community (Dumitr, and et.al., 2018). Critical skills of thethinking will reduce the controlled over the religious institution. Proper and advanced law areinvented by the part and fair judgement by judge only the thinking skills of the people and partyis critical. The main purposes of the critical thing skills is to implement the better decisions forthe positive result in the society. Decisions are taken for the benefits of the people like providethem proper rights of property and freedom of their transaction in the community.Claims, assertions and statements of the critical thinking skillsCritical thinking refers top have the ability of correctly thinking of believing and doingby the people. It defines that the people have the understanding of logics of the ideas and facts.The above study states that there are the conflicts between the democracy and the totalitarianismand at the last democracy wins. There are various claims and assertions given in the above casestudy that the communism is not always good for the society and democracy is not that muchcruel and unjust which is shown in this study (Firdaus, and et.al., 2015). Democracy is the
freedom and rights of the human but at some point democracy cannot affect properly with all thethree topics which are discussed in this study.The claims in the Russia that the democracy is comes without and any proper humanrights. For examples Like in the Egypt the Muslim parties stand for the election and wins but theproblem is that they have the opportunity of crush dissent totalitarian system, and applied theunwanted and unacceptable life for the people. So the results is democracy is not protecting therights of the human but it is drawback for the public (Huber and Kuncel, 2016). Under thecommunism the charity is illegal and banned by the communist party and various institutions ofthe religion should be managed and controlled by the communist party. Those people whowanted to work for community could take risk of arrest and imprisonment for the innocentactivities they did for the community. Because of this these people conducted their work secretlyin the community. Its not always true because democracy is not always bad it gives the freedomand proper rights to everyone. In the communism people do secretly the goods things for thesociety but in the democracy people have the full freedom and the rights to do anything in thesociety.Under the system of totalitarian government have the full control over the people of thecommunity. The claims that the freedom of the political parties is fully depended on theinstitution which have very simple networks. There are three institution under the totalitarianwhich have full control on the community. The institution of judicial independence says that thejudge follows the rules and regulations of the as their party if the party ad said to prison theperson then judge have to follow the instructions of the party otherwise the judge is also prisonedby the party (Kilgo, and et.al., 2018). Under this institution law should be made last time of anycase.Institution of the rights of the property says that everything is illegal means the people donot have anything on their names. Such as houses salary pensions profession of the people all aredepends on the confirmation of the government and could be replaced at any time the people willsuffer from this institution because people have nothing in their hands. All the things aredepended on the mutual trust of the people if they wanted anything they could take from theneighbour and if there is conflict happen between them both the persons will go to the prison forillegal transactions. The freedom of speech and opinion sometimes shows the negative effects onthe society everyone has the right to speak but it creates conflicts and criticize the orthodoxy
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Critical thinking Skills Assignment Samplelg...
|8
|2653
|32
Critical Analysis of Politics and Democracylg...
|9
|2739
|74
Critical Thinking for Democracylg...
|8
|2312
|33
Critical Thinking Case Studylg...
|8
|2439
|27
Understanding and Applying Critical Thinking - PDFlg...
|8
|2250
|22
Critical Thinking Skills - Doclg...
|9
|2619
|38