Critique Practice

CRITIQUE PRACTICE

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY.......................................................................................................................................3
CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................................8

INTRODUCTION
This report is based on the article 4 “ethnographic study of strategies to support discussions
with family member on end of life care for people with advance dementia in nursing homes” the
reason for choosing is that it is one of the biggest issues which is faced by the patient in current
scenario. Critiquing a research done in past is very necessary because it help the research and the
learner in understanding the alternatives of the research which has been conducted as it is not
necessary that the research which has been conducted is the best available. Critiquing a research
require a variety of the function and one of the most important function is to select the critiquing
tool. Research will be conducted on the basis of the Caldell et al (2005).
All the critique which has been find out is supported by providing evidence to the critique which as
it will help all the reader in making a link between what has been find out. On the basis of same
reader also can take the help of the researcher resources to verify the information which has been
identified. The article is based on the aim to uncertain “ethnographic study of strategies to support
discussions with family member on end of life care for people with advance dementia in nursing
homes”. For the purpose of same literature and Research methodology are made by the researcher
and also has presented the result of the finding.
MAIN BODY
Reflect content title
Title which has been selected in the article is “an ethnographic study of strategies to support
discussions with family member on end of life care for people with advance dementia in nursing
homes”. Title of article should show the hypothesis of study this title is good enough to show the
hypothesis as it defines clearly that this study is conduct to help people with advance dilemma
(Vogel and Punton, 2018). At the same time, it has been interpreted that the title should not be
complex but this title of article is complex as it includes extra sentence to describe it i.e. Discussion
with family member.
Author creditable
After going through the article, it can be critic that the author was more than creditable as
author has tried to keep both part of discussion in front of the reader by showing benefit and barrier
both of everything which has explained by the author which shows the honesty of the author. At the
same time, it can also be measured that the number of the example which was provided by author
was not enough to link it with the reality (Lupia, 2018).
Abstract summarized key point
Abstract was good but not that clear to have an impact on the reader of the article as every