Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations

This article explores the role of transnational ICT sector in corporate social responsibility and social media corporations. It highlights the legal implications, key ethical issues, and the ethical decision-making process. The article emphasizes the need for businesses to respect human rights and adhere to privacy commitments, policies, and practices.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
0
Title: Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
Assignment Name:
Student Name:
Professor:
Date:

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
1
Introduction
The role of the transnational ICT sector (Internet Communications Technology) is
broadly explored. The right to privacy of companies has been defined. The subject matter is very
controversial when it comes to exploring the different rights- right to freedom and right to
expression. A Transnational ICT company must be involved with surveillance and state
censorship and how the matters are conflicted upon the corporate governance and global network
initiatives. This is an industry which is dependent on the information effort. The companies must
engage in responsible business efforts, especially in the social media sector. The assessment of
human rights must be advocated within the different ICT companies.
The Background-Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media
Corporations
This is a digitized world where social media play a bigger role. Social media can have a
lot of impetus on the perception of human beings and underlying motives. The internet has
played an important role to upsurge the violent activities of various groups which has been
protesting for the freedom of expression and freedom of right within the community. The
internet revolution has been brought through the social media sites like Facebook and major
search engine Google (George, 2018). The pro-democratic process can be brought into the new
marketplaces through the active corporate social responsibility acts and different protest
programs. The motive behind all these protests on social media is to bring the dubbed revolution
2.0 and effective distribution of information through the various protest groups. However, there
exists a group of users which have been actively using the social media sites for spreading the
constructive information in public. The influence of corporations has been to create the members

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
2
public through the sharing of ideas and personal information. The communications technology
has been complicit in surveillance reports and censorship. The international media has been
covering the case of Shi Tao and highlighted the role of consistency with the Chinese law
(Bashir, Papamichail & Malik, 2017).
The ICT industry needs to align the conduct and human rights and major issues related
with corporate complicity must be taken into account. The fundamental human rights law has
been to protect the rights and privacy of people and this can sever the individuals as well as open
societies. Expression to right and freedom is central to human development, corporate
governance and different societies. Everyone has been given the right to freedom of expression
that can provide opinion without seeking any interference and also can impart information
through the help of media (Weiser, 2012). The right to expression has not been unlimited; there
have been imposed limits on how the state party can limit the expression. There are certain
restrictions on expression and this must be provided through the law. There are certain laws
which limit the permit invasion and privacy right and must be made proportionate competent in
making it against the interest of state. The present law must be able to safeguard the authorities
which can arbitrarily invade the autonomy. The protection must be to protect the freedom of
expression of different society groups and individuals who work for the society (Richards, 2006).
The Legal Implications
The ability of exchanging information and ideas has been improvised through media
groups. Ideas and information travel at a faster speed due to social media. The legal implications
of higher surveillance levels have been highlighted. For the exchange of convenience and ease of
use, the information is shared across the devices. For instance-fitness apps are used various

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
3
devices to track the distance. The uninterrupted use of technologies has vast consequences for
implications on right to privacy. Recognition of new realties, international corporations provide
guidance on how human rights must be revised. The existence of institutions which have a role
playing in the monitoring compliance and state commitments has been explained with respect to
the communication technologies (Kim & Choi, 2007).
The concerned state parties and companies must provide the account of advancements
made in communication and technology like mobile based and internet based technologies must
have a major impetus on the substantial dissemination systems. The companies are required to
take all the necessary steps to provide media independence and access to individuals and society
groups. Right to privacy and human rights hold offline must be protected online. This is the era
of digital communications where the policies and laws must be reviewed and personal data
inconsistency must be eradicated with protection of privacy rights (Martin, 2016). There are
certain privacy aspects with relevance to ICT industry and this includes data protection and
internet correspondence. There are certain resolutions which have been implemented with the
view to personal data collection and communication surveillance with relevance to
inconsistencies existing within the system. The companies need to adhere with the corporate
social responsibility practices for administration of the society groups and individuals. The
rethinking of rights and information protection is must for the ICT companies. The government
needs to take global initiatives on regulating the rights of activist on social media (Yang & Kent,
2014).
Key Ethical Issues
The key moral issues are enumerated below-

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
4
1. Corporate Governance-Corporate administration is an arrangement of principles and
frameworks that includes adjusting the interests of the administration and society. In the
present article on Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations made
by assembling and administrations, industry centers around the achievement of stabilized
human relations must be made compulsory in transnational companies (Sanchez de la
Nieta, 2015).
2. Corporate Social Responsibility-This is an automatic model which helps the
assembling and administration ventures to be socially responsible towards its partners
and network. In the present setting, businesses need to communicate the human rights
through social corporate responsibility acts (Doyle & Lee, 2016).
3. Corporate Citizenship-Corporate citizenship is an identity of business corporations
which has certain social, natural and social obligations towards people in general. The
business endeavors require a permit to work monetarily and fiscally. The assembling and
administration's industry needs to have practical experience in corporate social obligation
and maintainability. The organizations can take part in macro acknowledgment and
hierarchical development. The guideline of business expresses that a business must have
a physical foundation by which corporate social duty capacities are lined up with the
budgetary execution of the organization (Whelan, Moon & Grant, 2013).
4. Leadership-The authority style includes giving guidance, execution of activities and
inspiration of individuals. This is accomplished through the identity, rationality and
pioneer understanding. The business people need to approach and take authority in the
administration of human rights (Latham, 2007). There are certain indicators of leadership
which indicate the new businesses must engage in human rights through social media

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
5
corporations and different acts. The conservation of a right must be in relevance with the
voluntary code of conduct. Corporate self-regulation is through the self-imposition of
business risks and social risks. The investors must be provided information about the
adverse situations. The appropriate performance of firms is dependent on the compulsory
social obligations (Peterson, 2010).
The Opinion
The holding of data or personal information must be regulated by law. Effective measures
must be taken by the states to ensure the information related with the person’s life does not reach
the other person which is not abiding by the law. In order to live the protected life, every
individual must be provided with the freedom of protecting the information. This must be stated
in the laws. Every individual person must be provided with the information on different
authorities and regulatory bodies which are controlling the information. In case, if any file
pertaining to the information provided is incorrect, the request to change the information must be
provided to the individuals. Compliance requires that the integrity and confidentiality of
correspondence. Correspondence should be delivered to the addressee without interception and
without being opened or otherwise read. Surveillance, electronic, interceptions of telephonic,
other forms of communication, wire-tapping and conversations recording should be prohibited of
the industry. The human rights law must emphasize on the state responsibility for protection and
fulfilling the human rights and concerned with the role of abiding leaders have been prominent.
Corporate social responsibility has been under debate and has gained major influence which is
perceived to be regulating the commercial business. Commercial enterprises with relevance to
human rights should address the impacts of human rights and mandates business enterprises must

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
6
work in due diligences. There are certain processes to identify and mitigate the impacts of human
rights. The due diligence corporations should be practiced into the society and scrutiny for
human right risks must be into practice. There are certain quantitative and qualitative indicators
which must be tracked and private rights of the leaders must not be violated. The indicators must
be used strategically for enforcing the corporate adherence within the system.
Ethical Decision Making Process
Ethical choice process alludes to picking the arrangement of alternatives in a
methodology which are steady with the ethical standards. The ethical leadership process
regarding corporate social duty is as per the following-
1. Statement of Problem
2. Checking realities
3. Identification of noteworthy variables
4. Developing the rundown of choices
5. Testing the choices
6. Selecting a decision
7. Review
The assembling and administration organizations need to take part in moral basic
leadership were in the issues as for the shortage of characteristic assets can be settled (Jockel &
Dobler, 2006).
Seven Moral Philosophies
1. Goodness-The natural idea of Goodness includes a guarantee and duty towards society
through which a distinction can be made in individuals' life.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
7
2. Monism-Monism alludes to one thing which is viewed as great and Pluralism alludes to
in excess of two things. In the above setting, the maintainability hones must be sufficient
to determine transnational concerns (Culiberg & Bajde, 2013).
3. Hedonism-Hedonism can be characterized as the satisfactory or right conduct which
expands the result. In the above setting, indulgence alludes to an organization must not go
past the prerequisites of law while ensuring the ecological concerns.
4. Pluralist-A pluralist will take the contrary position and think nothing is great in this
world. The assessment of corporate social obligation with setting of political gatherings
and set of proposals required for the appraisal of CSR in assembling organizations.
5. Instrumentalist-Instrumentalist dismiss the possibility of the closures are
indistinguishable from the methods. The ascent of huge methodologies amid the previous
decade has been instrumental in corporate execution and estimating the money related
aftereffects of the organizations (Tsalikis & Peralta, 2018).
6. Teleology-Telelogy has been derived from the Greek word-Purpose or end. This is
worried about good methods of insight which are viewed as satisfactory or right and can
deliver wanted outcomes like vocation way, knowledge or joy. The ethical commitments
or activities which are required to be satisfied by the CSR organizations.
7. Teology- Teology alludes to the activities which are embraced by a person which are
correct and worthy for oneself intrigue. This is another idea and must be comprehended
from the religious purpose of which and can profit the corporate administration and
individual’s comprehension of CSR. The assembling organizations need to take part in
rehearses those are satisfactory by the general public and not especially for oneself

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
8
intrigue. The legitimate measurement surveys moral duty and aggregate activities of a
corporate substance
Corporate social responsibility is seen as a binding accord which emphasizes the
responsibilities of informed communities. The efforts made by legal processes are too hard to be
realized. The international instrument must be able to regulate the social impacts on global
enterprises. The digital rights must be presented to self-regulate the industry and must be in
compliance with the international standards of corporate governance. Businesses need to respect
the human rights and an agreement must be proposed to regulate the transnational companies. In
order to enjoy the human rights, the concrete steps are required to be taken (Finnstrom, 2012).
Conclusion
The business enterprises have a certain responsibility towards the protection of human
rights. Indicators which are used for the comparison and ranking of performance of different
states within a system must be able to measure the impacts. These indicators can help the
business enterprises incorporating the reputational rewards and risks. The business must continue
to escalate and must meet with the demands relevant to human rights. The international
advocates must use digital ranking systems for evaluating the communications technology and
major information of world. There are certain privacy commitments, policies and practices which
must be adhered by ICT companies.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
9
References
Bashir, N., Papamichail, K., & Malik, K. (2017). Use of Social Media Applications for
Supporting New Product Development Processes in Multinational
Corporations. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 120, 176-183.
Culiberg, B., & Bajde, D. (2013). Consumer recycling: An ethical decision-making
process. Journal Of Consumer Behaviour, 12(6), 449-459.
Doyle, E., & Lee, Y. (2016). Context, context, context: Priming theory and attitudes towards
corporations in social media. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 913-919.
George, E. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations:
Incorporating Human Rights Through Rankings, Self-Regulation and Shareholder
Resolutions. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Finnstrom, O. (2012). Ethical decision-making in neonatology - a Scandinavian
perspective. Acta Paediatrica, 101(6), 555-556.
Jockel, S., & Dobler, T. (2006). The Event Movie: Marketing Filmed Entertainment for
Transnational Media Corporations. International Journal On Media Management, 8(2), 84-
91.
Kim, S., & Choi, C. (2007). Habits, Self-Control and Social Conventions: The Role of Global
Media and Corporations. Journal Of Business Ethics, 76(2), 147-154.
Latham, M. (2007). Voter-Funded Media: Governance Reform for Democracies and
Corporations. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Martin, S. (2016). Corporations exploit social media while disregarding the public’s right to both
Privacy and Choice. Journal Of Management Policies And Practices, 4(1).
Richards, I. (2006). From Codes to Corporations. Media Asia, 33(1-2), 10-12.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media Corporations
10
Peterson, L. (2010). International Investment Law and Media Disputes: A Complement to WTO
Law. Transnational Corporations Review, 2(1), 9-12.
Sanchez de la Nieta, M. (2015). Editorial charters and newsroom councils in media corporations:
a view from the perspective of corporate social responsibility. Communication &
Society, 28(2), 55-72.
Tsalikis, J., & Peralta, A. (2018). Priming effects on business ethical decision making. Priming
Effects On Business Ethical Decision Making, 01(01).
Weiser, A. (2012). Book Review: Globalizing Sport: How Organizations, Corporations, Media,
and Politics are Changing SportsSageGeorge H., Globalizing Sport: How Organizations,
Corporations, Media, and Politics are Changing Sports, Paradigm, Boulder, CO, 2010, ISBN
9 7815 9451 7587, 270 pp., US$29.95 (pb). Distributor: Footprint Books. Media
International Australia, 142(1), 187-188.
Whelan, G., Moon, J., & Grant, B. (2013). Corporations and Citizenship Arenas in the Age of
Social Media. Journal Of Business Ethics, 118(4), 777-790.
Yang, A., & Kent, M. (2014). Social media and organizational visibility: A sample of Fortune
500 corporations. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 562-564.