The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 is by far the closest the world has come to a nuclear war. This paper elaborates on identifying the events before the Cuban Missile Crisis, its causes along with the actual events that took place in the crisis and its final impact and outcomes.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS Cuban Missile Crisis Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS 1. Introduction The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 is by far the closest the world has come to a nuclear war. There was considerable tension during that year between the Societ Union and the United States. The Cuban Missile Crisis was one of the major confrontations between these two states (Heller, 2016). This confrontation took place when the Soviets put missiles in Cuba, just twenty miles away from the coast of the U.S.A. During this period, the cold war reached its height due to the possible confrontation between the two superpowers of those times- the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics)and the US. It is one of the significant parts of world history as because of the high risk of the nuclear war which could result in the massive destruction of the entire world. During that time, the world was under the rule of Premier Nikita Khrushchev and John F. Kennedy. They were required to reach on a compromise; otherwise, the outcomes would be more fatal. The intensification of the Cuban missile crisis was the product of the United States’ aggressive military decisions made during John F. Kennedy’s early presidency which almost risked a nuclear holocaust. This paper shall elaborate on identifying the events before the Cuban Missile Crisis, its causes along with the actual events that took place in the crisis and its final impact and outcomes. 2. Body The Cuban Missile Crisis began during the end of the second World War (October 1962). When the war was towards its conclusion, the USSR and the US started to disagree on the major ideas of how post-war Europe should improve and look like in the near future (Risse-Kappen, 2016). The main aim of the US was to spread the concept of democracy and economic opportunities for the companies present in Europe. However, this aim was greatly differed from that of the USSR. The USSR wanted to protect themselves from the other wars which might take
2CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS place shortly as well as to spread communism all over the world. This difference in the thoughts of these countries leads to significant problems and tensions between them. The shelves of the supermarket were emptied of the bottled water, and soup cans, the school going children were ordered to remain in shelters, and the common public was forced to live in fear and turmoil of the crisis. It is one of the most dangerous periods of the very crisis and that of the Cold War. U.S and Cuba, both fought to be superior to the other. However, after waging a successful guerrilla war against the corrupt and repressive dictator of Cuba- Fulgencio Batista, Fidel Castro came into Power on 1stJanuary 1959 (Marshall, 2018). It is to note that Casto was not yet a communist and the policymakers of the United States initially took a very cautious wait-and-see approach to his regime. Furthermore, within a year, the relations of the United States and Cuba got worsened as Castro wanted to cut off the ties between the two. He made some anti-US radical and rhetoric policies and also refused to hold the elections. When it became clear that he intended to follow an alliance with the Soviet Union, the then President- Sir Dwight Eisenhower cut off all the ties to Cuba and started preparing some contingency plans to overthrow Fidel Castro and replace him within someone who is more amenable to the US. The US believed that if they remove Fidel Castro, the United States could quickly end the Cold War. According to Whitehead (2016), as the relations between the United States and Cuba got worsened, Fidel Castro sought help from the Soviet Union. They helped him by signing several trades and aid agreements with Cuba and provided him with nuclear arms and weapons. With the same, they also gave him political support for the Cuban revolution in the United Nations as well as in the other international organisations. It is to mention that the origin of the Cuban Missile Crisis lies in the unsuccessful invasion of Bay of Pigs, at the time of which the armed forces of Cuba overthrew the Cuban
3CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS exiles hoping to instigate an uprising against the Castro (Risse-Kappen, 2016). After the invasion, the Castro sought protection from the Soviet Union against the future aggression from the United States. Soviets tried their best to help Castro, providing nuclear weapons. However, it was based on a condition that the deal would remain a secret between the two until and unless the missiles are entirely operational. At that time, Cuba does have a restriction like those in the US (Marshall, 2018). There were many wealthy own sugar plantations in Cuba, and the country was ruled by a corrupt and repressive dictator, named, President Fulgencio Batista. Nikita Khrushchev had claimed that his motivation towards providing the Castro (Cuba) with the nuclear weapons was only to guard the Cuban Revolution against the aggression of United States. However, it was because of the mishandling of the Bay of Pigs invasion by John F. Kennedy that had resulted in this missile crisis in the first place. The Cuban Missile Crisis was also convinced Kennedy regarding the dangers of the nuclear brinksmanship.Its intensification was the product of the United States’ aggressive military decisions that were made during John F. Kennedy’s early presidency ana that had almost risked a nuclear holocaust.Khrushchev and Kennedy had squinted into the void of atomic destruction, but ultimately, it had managed to pull back from it (Powell, 2015). For preventing the future crises, they set up a hotline called Moscow Washington hostile within the White House for facilitating direct communication between the leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union. With the same, in the year 1963, Great Britain, the Soviet Union and the United States signed a treaty to ban the underwater and atmospheric nuclear testing. Notwithstanding the fact, this test-ban treaty was unsuccessful in stopping the arms race because Kenney concurrently authorised a vast arms buildup which expanded the atomic arsenal of United States and at the same time, amplified the strategic superiority of United States in the Cold War.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS On 3rd June 1961, the Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev and John F. Kennedy met in Vienna for a 2-day Summit (Rasmussen, 2017). Through a letter that was delivered to Nikita in March, Kennedy proposed a meeting of the two leaders for an informal exchange of their viewpoints. As per the same, they conferred in the absence of a set agenda. The following accounts confirmed that the two-day summit did not go well. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev left think Kennedy was weak.Khrushchev decided to bond with the Castro and took a tough stance over the Berlin, a Western enclave within East Germany, which was controlled by the East Germany, where Great Britain, France and the United States maintained a very symbolic military presence because Germany was defeated in the Second World War (Marshall, 2018). With the same, it is also to note that Kenndey later claimed that Khrushchev had rebuked him on a wide range of issues regarding Cold War, including the nuclear weapons as well as the "wars of the national liberation". However, gradually, in the final summit, it was Kennedy who won the approval of the Congress for an additional 3.25 billion dollars in the defence spending, the civil defence program and the tripling of the draft calls (Rogowski, 2017). Again, on 13thAugust of the same year, the Eastern Germans started building walls which quickly divided the Berlin into two different parts. Fidel Castro wanted to ensure that his country Cuba is protected from the United States since the Bay of Pigs invasion of 1961 (Whitehead,2016). Although he had defeated the invasion of the Cuban exiles at the Bay of Pigs, he was in utter fear that the United States still wants to invade his country for getting rid of him, changing the government and destroying the Communist Revolution of Cuba (LeoGrande, 2016). Therefore, he asked help from Khrushchev. However, Khrushchev was secretly sending the nuclear missiles to Cuba, and the weapons of the mass annihilation were now just 90 miles away from the US. He was very reluctant at first for
5CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS accepting the missiles as they were nuclear. The relationship between Cuba and the Soviet Union was inevitable as the relationship of United States with the Soviet Union was not good. With the same, the USSR sent materials to Cuba for building missile bases and the launch sites. It is to mention that Fidel Castro also warned Khrushchev for not moving the missiles in secret. He told him to consider the launch of a nuclear strike against the United States in the event in which the nation attacked Cuba. He wrote a letter in October 1962 to Nikita Khrushchev where he briefly detailed his concerns that the attack on Cuba was “imminent”. He also recommended him two possible variants- a) the air attack for destroying the specific targets b) a full invasion. After much consideration between the Cabinet of Kennedy and the Soviet Union, Kennedy finally agreed to eliminate all the missiles that they set on the border of Soviet Union in a condition that Khrushchev would remove all the weapons from Cuba. Khrushchev claimed that he was dismantling the weapons in Cuba. On the other hand, the Americans declared that they would not favour or invade Cuba, but they did not say anything regarding the removal of the Jupiter missiles of theirs, that they set in Turkey (Marshall, 2018). Because the withdrawing of the weapons from Turkey was not informed publicly, Khrushchev seemed to be losing the fight and become weakened. It was considered that Kennedy had won the contest between the then superpowers and Khrushchev was finally humiliated. However,Kennedy and Khrushchev successfully negotiated a very peaceful result to the very crisis. Furthermore, it is also to state that the extraordinary miscalculation of Kennedy has cost him his reputation as a powerful president. In case if the Bay of Pigs invasion had not taken place, then Khrushchev might not adopt the “penchant for bullying and intimidation” for Kennedy as well as the other deployed missiles of Cuba. It has become clear that Castro gradually became a figure who was associated with his failure and with the same, he was also
6CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS regarded as an enemy of extreme importance. This, in turn, had led to even more tensions between the superpowers in the lead up to the Cuban missile crisis. 3. Conclusion From the above analysis, it is to conclude that the Cuban Missile Crisis brought the human civilisation close to being destroyed. On October 1962 the Soviet provision of the ballistic missiles to Cuba resulted in most dangerous Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States and this had brought the entire world to the verge of the nuclear war. However, gradually, throughout two tensed weeks, John F. Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev successfully negotiated a very peaceful result to the crisis. However, although the US and the Soviet Union were able to come in front for compromising and resolving the crisis peacefully, not everyone was satisfied with this result, and one of them was Fidel Castro, the Cuban leader. It evoked the fears of the nuclear destruction and had also revealed the danger of the brinksmanship and the energised attempts to stop the arms race. However, it is clear that theintensification of the Cuban missile crisis was the product of the aggressive military decisions made by the United States at the time of John F. Kennedy’s early presidency that almost risked a nuclear holocaust. Moreover, it is ironic that this Cuban Missile Crisis that hardly involved the Warsaw Pact have had such a significant and long-lasting impact on the alliances. With the same, it is also scathing that the actions taken by the third party, i.e. Fidel Castro, have imposed one of the notable dangers at the time of an event which had traditionally been considered to be bilateral U.S.-Soviet confrontation.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS References: Heller, J. (2016). Kennedy, Israel and the Cold War before the Cuban Missile Crisis (1961–62). InTheUnitedStates,theSovietUnionandtheArab–Israeliconflict,1948–67. Manchester University Press. LeoGrande, W. M. (2016). The December 17, 2014 announcements that Cuba and the United States had agreed to begin normalising their bilateral relationship significantly reduced the threat that Washington posed to Cuban national security—a threat that has been acute for the past half-century. From 1959 to 2014, except for brief interludes in the.A New Chapter in US-Cuba Relations: Social, Political, and Economic Implications, 53. Marshall, J. (2018). The Dictator and the Mafia: How Rafael Trujillo Partnered with US Criminals to Extend His Power.Journal of Global South Studies,35(1), 56-86. Powell,R.(2015).Nuclearbrinkmanship,limitedwar,andmilitarypower.International Organization,69(3), 589-626. Rasmussen, K. G. (2017). Clash of Emotions: White House—State Department Relations during the Kennedy Administration.American Studies in Scandinavia,49(1), 19-40. Risse‐Kappen, T. (2016). Collective identity in a democratic community.Domestic Politics and Norm Diffusion in International Relations: Ideas Do Not Float Freely,34, 78. Rogowski,J.C.(2017).BargainingCommitmentsandExecutiveReputation:Legislative Response to Unilateral Action. Whitehead,L.(2016).The‘puzzle’ofautocraticresilience/regimecollapse:thecaseof Cuba.Third World Quarterly,37(9), 1666-1682.