Analyzing Culture: Perspective Manifest in Act and Artifact Essay

Verified

Added on  2023/06/11

|3
|579
|490
Essay
AI Summary
This essay delves into the intricate relationship between culture and individual perspectives, particularly as they manifest in actions and artifacts. It highlights the importance of understanding and acknowledging diverse viewpoints, drawing from personal experiences to illustrate how differing opinions, such as preferences for discussing books, can create social awkwardness. The essay emphasizes the significance of effective communication in bridging cultural gaps, promoting cohesion, and fostering problem-solving within organizations. By advocating for open-mindedness, respect for diversity, and consideration of potential sensitivities, the essay underscores the need for individuals to navigate social interactions with awareness and empathy, ultimately contributing to a more harmonious and understanding society. The references provided also support the ideas of family communication and leadership within family firms.
Document Page
Running head: CULTURE 1
Culture Is Perspective Manifest in Act and Artifact
Author’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
CULTURE 2
Culture Is Perspective Manifest in Act and Artifact
People have different cultural perspectives regarding certain issues around us in the
society. It is, therefore, paramount to understand the different views of different persons and
acknowledge their diversity. I happened to have family members who have varying opinions
pertaining some matter such as reading books. I always find it awkward when someone starts a
conversation about an evaluation of a certain book without even recognizing the fact that there
might be others who have not read the respective book. I understand that everyone has the right
to air out own opinion on the topic of their choice. Nonetheless, it bothers one to engage in a
conversation that is totally off the topic. In my opinion, I think it is logical to establish common
grounds for people you are conversing with to ensure that everyone is comfortable and
conversant with the topic of discussion.
It is common for people to have different ideas and interests in life. In this case, my
cousin likes reading and talking about books. I find it odd sometimes to strike a conversation
with a friend whereby they have no idea or knowledge about the topic at hand. People ought to
understand that communication is a core aspect of building a good rapport with others. As a
result, one should have an open mind when conversing with other people in order to avoid any
unprecedented schism. There are some factors one has to put into consideration when striking a
conversation with other people. For instance, it is usually prudent to comprehend the fact that
some topics might end up offending or hurting other based on their content (Galvin, Braithwaite,
& Bylund, 2015). To this end, I always find it vital for one acknowledge and appreciate the
diversity of others in order to ensure positive association.
There is a direct relation between communication and problem-solving practices. From
an organizational perspective, people ought to communicate effectively in order to bring
different ideas and opinions on the table. The idea of listening to each other is paramount in
ensuring that every person’s contribution has been put into consideration. It is important for
people to espouse certain qualities and values that will enhance coordination and ensure a
peaceful coexistence (Poza & Messer, 2001). Despite the fact that people might have different
sides of the story, it is necessary to promote cohesion by respecting the diversity of social,
cultural, or even religious views. The modern world is full of critiques and people will try to air
out their view in different ways. Therefore, the society ought to understand that everyone is
entitled to their view regardless of their background.
Document Page
CULTURE 3
References
Galvin, K. M., Braithwaite, D. O., & Bylund, C. L. (2015). Family Communication: Cohesion
and Change (Subscription). Routledge.
Poza, E. J., & Messer, T. (2001). Spousal leadership and continuity in the family firm. Family
Business Review, 14(1), 25-36.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 3
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]