Cyber Security: Response to Discussions on Cyber Terrorism, Malicious Programs, Hacking Detection and Choice Theory

Running head: CYBER SECURITY
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1CYBER SECURITY
Response to the Discussion 1
The article throws light on the critical system infrastructure and the network system of the
United States. The discussion mainly put its focus on the information of the cyber terrorism
and networking threats occurring in the United States. I agree with the writer’s statement,
that the focus of the information breach has done most damage in the Unites states (Patil et
al.,2017). Many intrusions remain undetected unless there is some potential sign of intrusion
seen or the attacks. The paper discusses the onset of these problems since April 1998, for data
breach. The paper clearly gives prime examples through research that the military
organisation, NASA and the information defence are also affected by these networking
threats.
Reference
Patil, S., Jangra, A., Bhale, M., Raina, A. and Kulkarni, P., 2017, September. Ethical hacking:
The need for cyber security. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Power, Control,
Signals and Instrumentation Engineering (ICPCSI)(pp. 1602-1606). IEEE.
Respond to Discussion 2
The discussion 2 shares the prime threats that the country fears are virus and worms. As per
the writer, I find this paper satisfactory enough to discuss the potential threats that have been
faced in United States. The writer primarily discuss the importance of the overall definition
of the virus and worm through referencing books and journals to help the reader have the
clear understanding about the subject(Narra, et al., 2016). The writer also throw lights over