Data Analysis of Charles Sturt and Port Adelaide Enfield Communities

This report compares the development of children in Charles Sturt and Port Adelaide Enfield communities based on data analysis. It analyzes the growth and performance of different skills in each community and provides a comparative analysis. The performance of both communities is found to be fluctuating, making it difficult to determine which community is better for child development.

DATA ANALYSIS

Contents
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY.............................................................................................................................................3
CONCLUSION........................................................................................................................................10

INTRODUCTION
The report is based on making comparison of two different communities which are Charles Sturt
community, South Australia and Port Adelaide Enfield community. This comparison has been
done in order to know that which community is working effectively for development of children
in different regions. This analysis has been done by help of interpretation of given data set as
well as using graphs.
MAIN BODY
Charles Sturt community, South Australia:
Physical health and
well being Social competence Emotional maturity Vulnerable on two
or more domains
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
9.7
7.8
9.7
16.1
11 10.3
14.8
Brompton and surrounds
Brompton and surrounds (2015 vs 2018) Brompton and surrounds (2012 vs 2018)
Analysis: In terms of such region this can be find out that there is growth in four sectors
including physical, social competence, emotional maturity and vulnerable on two or more
domains. Though, growth is higher during time period of 2012 vs 2018.

Communication skills
and general knowledge Vulnerable on one or
more domains Vulnerable on two or
more domains
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
-6.5
-9.1
-10.7-10.4
-7.8
-9.9
Findon
Findon (2012 vs 2015) Findon (2012 vs 2018)
Analysis: With rational to this region, there is negative development in both time period during
2012 vs 2015 and 2012 vs 2018. This negative growth is under three aspects of development.
Social competence
Emotional maturity
Language and cognitive skills (school-based)
Communication skills and general knowledge
Vulnerable on two or more domains
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15 8.9 12.6
7.1
14.3
-8.4 -12.5 -8.7 -12.8
Flinders park
Flinders Park (2012 vs 2015) Flinders Park (2015 vs 2015)
Analysis: Under such region, there is mix up performance for development of children under five
types of skills. Though performance is better in year 2012 vs 2015.

Social competence Emotional maturity Language and
cognitive skills
(school-based)
Communication
skills and general
knowledge
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Athol park
Athol Park (2012 vs 2015) Athol Park (2015 vs 2015) Athol Park (2012 vs 2018)
Analysis: Under such region, there is again negative development of children during three-year
time period. Though there is positive growth for development of communication skills.
Social competence
Emotional maturity
Language and cognitive skills (school-based)
Communication skills and general knowledge
Vulnerable on one or more domains
Vulnerable on two or more domains
-20
-10
0
10
20
Woodville/Cheltenham/Saint Clare
Woodville/Cheltenham/Saint Clare (2012 vs 2015)
Woodville/Cheltenham/Saint Clare (2015 vs 2018)
Analysis: Similar to above, there is mix up performance in each development aspect but during
time of 2012 vs 2015, there was positive growth in development of skills of children.

Woodville West (2012 vs
2015) Woodville West (2015 vs
2018) Woodville West (2012 vs
2018)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
-14.3
10.3
16.8
21.721
10.7
Woodville West
Social competence
Communication skills and general knowledge
Vulnerable on one or more domains of the AEDC
Vulnerable on two or more domains of the AEDC
Analysis: In above region, there is positive performance of above community as they are able to
enhance different skills of children except communication skill in 2012 vs 2015 time.
Summary of performance of Charles Sturt community: In above analysis, key regions are
selected and this can be inferred that their performance is average in different regions. In order to
make competitive analysis below evaluation of performance of another community is done:
Port Adelaide Enfield community:

Taperoo/Osborne (2012 vs
2015) Taperoo/Osborne (2015 vs
2018) Taperoo/Osborne (2012 vs
2018)
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
-9.7
-6.4
-9.8
-12.1
-15.8 -16.2
-15.4 -14.6
-15.7
-18.3
Taperoo/Osborne
Social competence Emotional maturity
Language and cognitive skills (school-based) Communication skills and general knowledge
Vulnerable on one or more domains of the AEDC Vulnerable on two or more domains of the AEDC
Analysis: In terms of such region, this can be stated that there is negative growth of development
of different skills.
Woodville Gardens (2015 vs 2018) Woodville Gardens (2012 vs 2018)
15
15.5
16
16.5
17
17.5
18 17.7
15.9
Woodville Garden
Analysis: In the context of above region, this can be inferred that there is only one skill which
has been developed by above community. Apart from this, there is no any other skill in which
they worked for development.

Physical health and
well being Social competence Emotional maturity Language and
cognitive skills
(school-based)
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-10
9
13.6
9 7.3
-8.7
-6.3
Ferryden Park
Ferryden Park (2012 vs 2015) Ferryden Park (2015 vs 2018)
Ferryden Park (2012 vs 2018)
Analysis: In terms of such region, there is negative growth in terms of physical health and
wellbeing during 2015-2018. In addition to this, there are two other skills which are emotional
maturity and language skills in which performance is poor. Apart from this, social competence
skills improved effectively in both 2015 vs 2018 and 2012 vs 2018.
Physical health and well being
Social competence
Emotional maturity
Language and cognitive skills (school-based)
Communication skills and general knowledge
Vulnerable on two or more domains of the AEDC
-15
-5
5
15
25 16.7 21.1 21.1 14.516.7 18.3 14.1
22.5
-12.5
Angle park
Angle Park (2012 vs 2015) Angle Park (2015 vs 2018) Angle Park (2012 vs 2018)
Analysis- In the context of above location or region this can be find out that there is positive
performance under each time period. Though in the aspect of language skill there is negative
growth during time period of 2015 vs 2018. This shows that under above location, Port Adelaide

Enfield community worked well which lead to effective performance for development of
children.
Physical health and well being
Social competence
Emotional maturity
Language and cognitive skills (school-based)
Communication skills and general knowledge
Vulnerable on one or more domains of the AEDC
Vulnerable on two or more domains of the AEDC
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
Rose water
Rosewater (2012 vs 2015) Rosewater (2015 vs 2018) Rosewater (2012 vs 2018)
Analysis: In the context of Rose water region, again the performance is good enough for each
skill of development of children. This is so because above graph shows that there is positive
outcome for each skill. Similar to above location, there is one skill whose performance need to
be enhance and this is social competence skill during time period of 2015 vs 2018.
Physical health and well being
Social competence
Emotional maturity
Language and cognitive skills (school-based)
Vulnerable on one or more domains of the AEDC
-25
-15
-5
5
15
Birkenhead/Peterhead
Birkenhead/Peterhead (2012 vs 2015) Birkenhead/Peterhead (2015 vs 2018
Birkenhead/Peterhead (2012 vs 2018)

Analysis: In the context of above location, it can be inferred that community’s performance is
too poor for development of children. There is only one skill whose performance is positive and
it is emotional maturity skill. In addition to this, the performance is poor under each time period
including 2012 vs 2015, 2015 vs 2018 and 2012 vs 2018.
Comparative analysis: In comparative manner, this can be inferred that both communities’
performance is fluctuating and it is difficult to define that which community is better for
development of children. Though Port Adelaide Enfield community’s performance is good as
their performance is weak in few regions and apart from this their performance is acceptable. On
the other side, in the aspect of the another community the Charles Sturt, it can be stated that their
performance is not so effective. They are not able to do proper development of children skills
with full of consistency.
CONCLUSION
On the basis of above report this can be stated that Port Adelaide Enfield community’s
performance is better than Charles Sturt community. It is so because they are able to develop
skills of children in more effective way. This has been justified by help of graphical presentation
of given data set and by interpretation of outcome.