Letter of Advice for Reethi and Rohan regarding Reethi's visa options

LETTER OF ADVICE
Name of the Student-
[DATE]
Toshiba

LETTER OF ADVICE
To Reethi and Roman,
Subject: - Letter of advice to Reethi and Rohan regarding Reethi’s visa option, both onshore and
offshore including the bridging visa implications
Dear Reethi and Rohan,
After a reasonable evaluation of your case, I have found some issues regarding Reethi’s visa
choices, including both offshore and onshore area based intimations. Therefore, the following
opinion is stated as below:-
As a registered migration representative, it is found that both of you would face the following
problems in the process.
1) Acquiring the protection 866 visa
2) Whether or not you will be able to thrive through visa prospectus
3) Whether you are eligible for the visa or not
I will like to tell you details regarding the concerning the protection 866 visa. This is a
type of visa which is issued to outcasts’ persons accompanied with the quest of asylum. These
persons are of free of ill-treatment in their own country. The reason behind the ill-treatment to
such outcasts is being there religion, views, race, and nationality of a particular group (Minister
for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Haji Ibrahim)1.
1 (2000) 204 CLR 1

LETTER OF ADVICE
According to Australian Migration Act 1958, individuals who are held as refugees can
make an appeal for the protection visa. In order to get the protection visa precondition for
migration, they are required to outcasts to reside and work in Australia permanently. Those
refugees should also get accessed to Medicare and services which are center linked. In some
cases, an individual is restrained from applying for second visa apart from the protection visa2.
This case visibly shows that Reethi is entitled to apply herself for visa and she also
possess all the applications or documents needs for acquiring the visa.
However, justifications regarding the eligibility criteria have been given as below
The eligibility criteria for getting a visa is given below and Reethi has to comply by these
terms.
 Provided that the person should possess the valid visa leaving in Australia and should not have
any unauthorized or unlawful marine entry
 Person should comply with protections responsibility/obligations/duty of Australian laws
 The concern should be alluring for the protection
 Proof of individual showing that the person is an outcasts and the concern should comply with
the requirements of the Australia Migration Act
 Concerned person should possess the proper health and character demand
 Minister should be made satisfied about issuance of the visa that it is in public interest(not
harmful to the public)
2 Peter Hughes , and Arja Keski-Nummi. "BEYOND OPERATION SOVEREIGN BORDERS A LONG-
TERM ASYLUM POLICY FOR AUSTRALIA." (2016)35(5)Journal OF Mgration Affairs