Decision-Making Process in Female Genital Mutilation: A Review

Decision-Making Process in
Female Genital Mutilation: A
Review

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Critical appraisal........................................................................................................................3
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................3
METHODS............................................................................................................................4
RESULTS..............................................................................................................................5
DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................7

Introduction
The purpose of the project is to investigate the Female genital mutilation/cutting
(FGM/C) household decision making process and along with that identifying the major
people who are involved in the household decision making. FGM/C is the most damaging
practice and despite of the efforts being put in order to end such practice, the existing trends
and patterns of the decrease are not sufficient in regard to overcome the population’s
underlying growth. This research summarizes that the decision-making process differs from
region to region and it mainly includes more than one person and therefore, each that person
has different power pertaining to the decision. Fathers, moms, and grandmas are the
fundamental decision makers. It was appeared from this audit that opening the dialogue with
respect to FGM/C between genders may prompt a beneficial decision cycle. The support of
fathers in the decision may liberate the moms from the prevailing difficulty and obligation of
carrying on conventions and establish a better climate to stop FGM/C practice.
The CASP framework is being used which helps in developing the evidence-based
approach in respect to the health and social care or in regard to working with the other health
related national and international organizations. In this study different appraisal tools are
being applied but for the qualitative research, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) is
being used for the quality assessment (Long, French and Brooks, 2020). CASP intends to
assist people with creating aptitudes to discover and make sense of the research evidence,
assisting them with applying proof in practice. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP)
apparatuses were created to show individuals how to fundamentally assess various sorts of
evidence. There are seven agendas explicitly intended to assess: systematic reviews, RCTs,
qualitative research, diagnostic test and case control studies, economic evaluation studies and
the cohort studies.
Critical appraisal
INTRODUCTION
Central purpose
The central purpose of the author is to examine the FGM/C family decision making
cycle and to distinguish the fundamental decision makers in the family. Likewise, the author
evaluates the requirement for additional examination in this field or the chance of executing
mediations.
Rationale