MGT602 Business Decision Analytics

Decision Style Analysis 1
Decision Style Analysis
Student’s Name:
Institutional affiliation:
Course:
Date:

Decision Style Analysis 2
Introduction
Decision-making remains to be a widely used concept in the field of business. Ideally,
decision-making remains viewed as the notion of miscellany course of action to weigh
alternatives and find the simplest and final solution to a problem. In that regard, different
situations will call for the different managers to choice different approach of making their
decision so that they can be effective in their various problems (Leeuw, 2015). For that matter, it
is clear that the success of an organization entirely depends on the decision-making style that
remains deployed by the top managers in an organization. Therefore, this essay will attempt to
discuss in detail the various decision-making style preferences (Arnott & Pervan, 2016).
Section One: Analysis of the self-decision preference
Decision style Domain Preference Domain
Relationship Choice Clothing Vacation Medical
Intuition low high mid high
Balance high low med low
Logic high high mid low
According to the figure above the mean value of this decision, preference is the high. In
order to increase the level of logic to high level, there is need for the action of more education
and creation of the awareness on the importance of medical aspect in their live. After, addressing
that need, I will figure the vacation ideology. In this line, I will make sure that I will need to
understand the importance of vacation in varnishing human brain (Fitzgerald, Mohammed &
Kremer, 2017). To sum up, the general activity that will remain conducted to improve the norms
to high level; I will conduct awareness and creation of significant perception of the above
activities on the health of an individual.

Decision Style Analysis 3
Section 2: Keep a Decision Diary
A decision dairy is the follow of essay or template that can be used by an individual to
improve the way that he/she can make decision after an essential analysis and giving out a
crucial feedback loop.
The Challenge Diary Decision Preference
Full Name Time-day-year/ Signed by the Mentor
What are the challenges you have
encountered this week?
 Description
 Where
 With who
How do you feel?
o Happy

Decision Style Analysis 4
o Angry
o Sad
o Energized
o Relaxed
What are you going to do?
 Description
What is motivating you right now?
 Description
How do you react to hard situations?
 Description
How do you make decision
 Description

Decision Style Analysis 5
Do you know how to control your emotions?
 Description
Are you rational to your decision making?
 Description
Section 3: Identify Own Type and Shadow Side
According to the 16 personality model, I realized that my personality is Commander (ENTJ-A).
From this analysis, I realized that commander personalities are leaders’ oriented
individuals. In that, regard I agreed with this ideology since I find myself embodied with the gift
of charisma and confidence. Additionally, I tend to have the power of attracting people together
with a purpose of moving together with common goal (Leeuw, 2015). On other hand, I have the
notion of ruthless character more particular on the line that I what to achieve my goals and plan
in my life. From the analysis, I was surprised that this type of personality is based on 3% of the
entire population of the world.
This type of personality has facilitated my strategic thinking and the creation of the
strong willed. Technically, I have always struggled to the end in any situations and the notion of
the quitting has never been my portion. Additionally, the philosophy of making sound decision

Decision Style Analysis 6
on the problem with the aim of moving forward for bigger plan has also played a significant role
in my entire life (Arnott & Pervan, 2016).
The main surprise that this ideology has revealed is that, it is clear that all the weakness
that this type of personality is presenting defines me. Nevertheless, the concept of impatient,
poor management of emotion, cold and ruthless, and arrogance has always my biggest weakness
that the world has seen (Zarei et al. 2016). Additionally, this ideology is exemplary true. A
defensible explanation for that line of thinking is that, commander traits are always up for
challenge. In reality, command personality individuals tend to nurture their children with care
and respect. In essence, they tend to see the success of their children as a reflection of their
personality and standards that they believe defines them (Lauriola, Panno, & Weller, 2018).
In my analysis, the main show that befalls in my part is the thinking capability. In spite of the
part being one of the remarkable functions that defines commander personality, I happen to find
out that this is one of the main shadows of my personality. Ideally, I happen to be one of a kind
person that I can speak before I even listen, I am capable of judging before perceiving. In that
point of view, this trait tends to make me an abrasive individual a factor that is affecting me
negatively (Rood et al 2015).
The extroverted thinking capability is the line that o need to develop so that I can be able
to make use of information, proper medium of communication, and making of sound decision to
various situations. In the field of psychology, the shadow part of an individual tends the unloved,
dark, and repressed side of an individual. In the context of the typologies, my dominant and
auxiliary function tends to lie at the core of part of my ego (Böckenholt & Meiser 2017). In that
regard, I need to develop may shadow part so that I can stabilize and I manage to handle my ego
inflation and disruption to stress.

Decision Style Analysis 7
High Med Low Med High
Extraversion E high med low med high Introversion I
Intuition N high med low med high Sensing S
Thinking T high med low med high Feeling F
Judging J high med low med high Perceived P
From the analysis above, it is clear that the opposite of my personality is the ISFP, which
are the composers (Arnott & Pervan, 2016). They are individuals that remain energized by the
time they spent alone. In that point of view, they are introverted. Additionally, they tend to focus
on the ideas and concepts. Therefore, from this analysis it is sound to conclude that they make
decisions basing on their feeling and values (Barlett, 2016).
Development map
Action Objective Accountable Responsible
Find the weakness
that need to be
addressed with
immediate effect to
help me find make
sound decisions
I will analysis the
weakness that drags
me back from my
goals.
Prioritize the main
action for dealing
with the weakness
Me New mentor
Find new mentor to
help me utilize the
resource that include
online material to
Maximize my
production in the
carious working
Me New mentor

Decision Style Analysis 8
better my weakness
and learn on how to
cope up with various
situations as a leader
type individual.
environment
Will compress more
16 personality model
to find my ultimate
match and shadows
Creation of new
schedule that is the
daily schedules and
the budget baseline
Getting the approval
from the new mentor
Me New mentor
Section 4: Participate in a Mentoring-Feedback Session
After a critical analysis of the decision dairy and the 16 personality model, I realized that
I have an issue with the weakness of the impatient, and ability to make justification in term of
judging (Barlett, 2016). Importantly, after the decision with the mentor, he enlightened me with
insightful information have to deal with the main weaknesses (Greco, Figueira & Ehrgott, 2016).
He asked me to concentrate on the preventive control to deal with the dairy challenges that
I happen to encounter in the daily life (Arnott & Pervan, 2016). For instance, physical locks
among the issues that make me annoyed. Additionally, he asked me to concentrate more on the
detective and corrective control.
I intend to improve this ideology by considering the main weakness so that I can be a potential
leader in future. Again, I intend to work on the notion of balance and judgement making ability
in improve my interactions in the various environments.

Decision Style Analysis 9
Conclusively, before I learnt this subject, I was not away of my personality as an
individual. This subject has enlightened me on important aspect that are vital form my future
career and me. Therefore, I recommend this concept to be introduced as a common unit in the
various learning institutions so that people can be aware of their potentials and weaknesses.

Decision Style Analysis 10
List of references
Greco, Figueira & Ehrgott, 2016. Several Criteria Verdict Scrutiny. New York: Springer
publishers.
Fitzgerald, Mohammed & Kremer 2017. Variations on Decision-Making: The upshot of decision
style diversity on process conflict in design teams, 104, pp.339-344.
Barlett, ed, 2016. Farming decision-making: Anthropological contributions to rural
development. Chicago Publication press.
Zarei, Mohammadfam, Aliabadi, Jamshidi & Ghasemi 2016. Competence Forecast of control
room operators on human reliability analysis. Process Safety Progress, 35(2), pp.192-
199.
Lauriola, M., Panno, A. and Weller, J.A., 2018. Regret-Aligned Decision-Making Style Acts,
Psychosomatic study, p.0033294118786687.
Böckenholt & Meiser 2017. Retort approach analysis with threshold and multi‐process IRT
models, 70(1), pp.159-181.
Rood, Van Zuuren, Stam, van der Ploeg, Huijgens, & Verdonck‐de Leeuw 2015. Cognitive
coping style and the importance of information. Psycho
‐Oncology, 24(5), pp.564-571.
Arnott & Pervan 2016. A Significant breakdown of verdict support systems research revisited:
In Enacting Research Methodology in Information Systems (pp. 43-103). Palgrave
Macmillan, Cham.

Decision Style Analysis 11
APPENDICES
Appendix A
A diagram illustrating the control and flow of emotions, from the diagram, direct and indirect
decision remains triggered by the impact and state of the emotions particularly immediate ones.
In that point of view, it is clear that psychology offers an individual ability to change someone’s
decision and behaviours, which is a central concept of the conversion rate optimization.

Decision Style Analysis 12
Appendix B
Full Name Time-day-year/ Signed by the Mentor
What are the challenges you have
encountered this week?
 Description
A personal life conflict
 Where
In school
 With who
My close friend
12:00 Noon, 5th October 2018
How do you feel?
o Happy
o Angry
o Sad
o Energized
o Relaxed
12:15 PM, 5th October 2018
What are you going to do?
 Description
Am going to revenge
12:30 PM, 5th October 2018

Decision Style Analysis 13
What is motivating you right now?
 Description
I think am motivated by my internal force and
the present am yet to receive
12:45 PM, 5th October 2018
How do you react to hard situations?
 Description
I react to fast to difficult situations so that i can
overcome the easily
1:00 PM, 5th October 2018
How do you make decision
 Description
I make my decision concerning my immediate
emotions
1:15 PM, 5th October 2018
Do you know how to control your emotions?
 Description
Am not aware of that honestly
1:30 PM, 5th October 2018
Are you rational to your decision making?
 Description
Am yet to know that
1:45 PM, 5th October 2018