Decision Style Analytics for Business Decision Making - MGT602
Added on 2023-06-03
9 Pages1605 Words328 Views
Running Head: BUSINESS DECISION 1
MGT602 Business Decision Analytics
Decision Style Analytics
Name:
Institution:
Decision Style Analytics
MGT602 Business Decision Analytics
Decision Style Analytics
Name:
Institution:
Decision Style Analytics
Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................2
Body...........................................................................................................................................3
Insights into Decision Preference Test Results......................................................................3
Reflection on Decision Styles................................................................................................3
Feedback on Decision Styles..................................................................................................3
Self- Development Strategies and Discussions......................................................................3
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................3
Recommendations......................................................................................................................3
References..................................................................................................................................3
Appendices.................................................................................................................................3
Introduction................................................................................................................................2
Body...........................................................................................................................................3
Insights into Decision Preference Test Results......................................................................3
Reflection on Decision Styles................................................................................................3
Feedback on Decision Styles..................................................................................................3
Self- Development Strategies and Discussions......................................................................3
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................3
Recommendations......................................................................................................................3
References..................................................................................................................................3
Appendices.................................................................................................................................3
Introduction
The major aim of this report is to for me to demonstrate the ability to select and
evaluate the usefulness of a range of decision making tools and reflect on my decision-
decision making styles and contrast with other styles to determine the respective levels of
rationality and intuition utilized. This objective will be achieved by conducting a number of
activities. The activities involved in this exercise include identifying my own decision
preferences, keeping a decision diary and identifying my own type and shadow side. These
activities have been done and discussed in details in the subsequent sections.
In a nutshell, the results demonstrates that intuition has an average score of D which is
a high score. The analysis further demonstrates that I generally trust I hunches in your
problem analysis and making. The average logic score is E, which is a high score. This result
demonstrate that on most occasions I tend to prefer using my logical thinking when analyzing
problems and making decisions. Similarly, my average score in balance is E, which is a high
score. This is an indication that I tend to have a strong interest in the implications my
decisions have on others (Stuart A., 2009).
Similarly, based on mind and how we interact with our environment, I am rated as
extraverted, intuitive, observant, using feeling making decisions, judgmental and assertive.
These are very important trains in the decision making process at personal level or corporate
level (Doda, et al., 2014).
Body
Analysis of own decision preference
This sections outlines the results of the various decision preferences as well as
exploring opportunities for change and improvements. The three decision preferences
considered in this scenario are intuition, logic and balance (Lind, 2008). The score on these
preferences have been graded as either low, medium or high. These three components are
The major aim of this report is to for me to demonstrate the ability to select and
evaluate the usefulness of a range of decision making tools and reflect on my decision-
decision making styles and contrast with other styles to determine the respective levels of
rationality and intuition utilized. This objective will be achieved by conducting a number of
activities. The activities involved in this exercise include identifying my own decision
preferences, keeping a decision diary and identifying my own type and shadow side. These
activities have been done and discussed in details in the subsequent sections.
In a nutshell, the results demonstrates that intuition has an average score of D which is
a high score. The analysis further demonstrates that I generally trust I hunches in your
problem analysis and making. The average logic score is E, which is a high score. This result
demonstrate that on most occasions I tend to prefer using my logical thinking when analyzing
problems and making decisions. Similarly, my average score in balance is E, which is a high
score. This is an indication that I tend to have a strong interest in the implications my
decisions have on others (Stuart A., 2009).
Similarly, based on mind and how we interact with our environment, I am rated as
extraverted, intuitive, observant, using feeling making decisions, judgmental and assertive.
These are very important trains in the decision making process at personal level or corporate
level (Doda, et al., 2014).
Body
Analysis of own decision preference
This sections outlines the results of the various decision preferences as well as
exploring opportunities for change and improvements. The three decision preferences
considered in this scenario are intuition, logic and balance (Lind, 2008). The score on these
preferences have been graded as either low, medium or high. These three components are
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Decision Style Analysislg...
|8
|1721
|303
Understanding Personality and Decision Making Styleslg...
|7
|1483
|242
Reflection on Decision Style Analysislg...
|8
|1720
|236
Decision Analysis: Identifying Individual Decision Preferenceslg...
|10
|1407
|190
Business Decision Analytics: Decision Style Analysislg...
|8
|1499
|160
Business Decision Makinglg...
|12
|2051
|448