1.Likert data can be analyzed by comprehending the measurement scale represented by it. Generally, any numeric figure associated with a Likert data define a “less than” or “greater than” type of ordinal relation,however, lesser or greater amountsare not explicitly mentioned. Therefore, thethreedescriptive statistics suggested for measure of central tendency aremedianormode, whereasfrequenciesfor measure of deviation Again, Likert scale data is an interval measurement scale evaluated from the compound score from the Likert data by considering their average or sum. Descriptive statistics includemeanfor central tendency andstandard deviationfor measure of dispersion. The reason behind choosingmedianormode, whereasfrequenciesas the three statistics for describing the shape of the data due to the ordinal nature of Likert data. Statistics like mean and standard deviation would give inappropriate and unclear meaning in describing the data, especially if there is clustering of responses at a particular option in the data (Sullivan, & Artino Jr, 2013). For example, opinions abouteffectiveness of an on-field industrial trainingare collected on a five point Likert scale with five options ranging from “highly effective” to “highly ineffective”. Now, if mean and standard deviation are used to understand the shape of the data then average of the scores from “highly effective” and “effective” would provide useless information. In this case, frequencies for each response, and the median/mode for the distribution would help in describing the location of the peak and the variability. In case of clustering of responses, median, mode and frequencies would efficiently help in describing the shape of the distribution (Subedi, 2016). 2
Likert OptionsResponses Highly Effective25 Effective30 No Idea10 Ineffective5 Highly Ineffective3 Total73 2.According to the problem the sample has to be divided into two sub-samples based on the gender of the participants. The comparison between the responses of men and women to find any significant difference in their opinion could be conducted using Mann-Whitney test. This non-parametric test is usually used for non-normal data and ordinal data. In the present case, data is ordinal in nature and choice of the test is appropriate. It is important to mention that Mann-Whitney test would test the difference in median while comparing the two samples to assess whether both the samples come from the same population (Harpe, 2015). Likert OptionsResponsesMenCum.FreqWomenCum.Freq Highly Effective 25771818 Effective302330725 No Idea10838227 Ineffective5038532 Highly Ineffective 3139234 Total733934 3
Let, X is the variable for responses by men, and Y is the variable for responses by women. Median for men is evaluated as 39/2 = 19.5 (effective), and 34/2 = 17 (Highly effective) for women. Now, the shape and location of the distributions for both samples along with p- values will decide the significance of difference. Mann-Whitney also calculates the rank of the responses and compares them. The hypothesis testing would follow the following steps. Null hypothesis: The two medians are same Alternate hypothesis: Two median are significantly different (two-tailed) Level of significance is considered to be 5%. A two-tailed hypothesis testing would yield the test statistic U = 527.5, where Z-score = 1.49 with p-value = 0.136. Hence, this implies there is no significant difference between the two samples. References Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales.Journal of graduate medical education,5(4), 541-542. Subedi, B. P. (2016). Using Likert type data in social science research: Confusion, issues and challenges.International journal of contemporary applied sciences,3(2), 36-49. Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data.Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning,7(6), 836-850. 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser