Design Thinking Tools for Impacts of Physical Activities in Vertical Schools in Australia

This presentation discusses the application of design thinking tools in Australian schools to explore the impacts of physical activities in vertical schools. It covers various tools such as visualization, journey mapping, value chain analysis, mind mapping, brainstorming, concept development, assumption testing, rapid prototyping, customer co-creation, and learning launch. The presentation emphasizes the need for a balance between physical activities and theoretical knowledge and justifies the implementation of physical activities in schools through value chain analysis.

TOPIC: IMPACTS OF STUDENTS PHYSICAL
ACTIVITIES BY THE RISE OF VERTICAL
SCHOOLS IN AUSTRALIA
DESIGN IT

INTRODUCTION
 The assignment focuses on the application of design thinking tools
in Australian schools
 The impact of the tools are discussed
 The appropriate use of a design tool is also provided

DESIGN THINKING TOOL
 It helps to solve and identify problems
 Helps in identifying the essence of problems
 Helps in designing extreme centered process
 It can be used for initiating different components

VISUALISATION
Outcome
Background of the problem and the
manner in which it can be
prevented in the future
Challenge
Current state of problem need to be
ignored and less effective steps of
solving problems
Critics
Can be applied after analysing the
current condition of the individuals
and the topic
Brief
It uses mind-set imagery so that
foreshadowing can be provided to
the topic at hand

JOURNEY MAPPING
Outcome
The experience can help in
reducing the impact of the problem
at hand
Challenge
Does not possess consensus
Critics
Cannot reach a large number of
people
.
Brief
Provides an assessment of the
experience of the people related to
the problem

VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
Outcome
Need to form a productive mindset
for analytical thinking
Challenge
Does not have experienced
personnel and requires extensive
analysis
Critics
Implementation of the tools can be
used to assess data and predict the
individuals
Brief
It helps in analysing and examining
the value chain so that improvement
can be made

MIND MAPPING
Outcome
Collected data is used for analysis
and innovative concept
Challenge
Does not possess reliable
information
Critics
Provides recommendations about
the manner in which development
of physical activities can take place
Brief
Explores known activities so that
designs can be created

BRAINSTORMING
Outcome
Does not posses a recognised
framework
Challenge
Excessive number of ideas
Critics
Important concepts and ideas can
be generated that may deter the
existing concepts
Brief
Helps in gaining new alternatives in
business and develop new ideas

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT
Outcome
Can be aligned with the moving
forward technique
Challenge
Lack of design skills
Critics
It takes the output of brainstorming
and provides it in a cluster
Brief
Helps in developing a viability of
activities

ASSUMPTION TESTING
Outcome
Assumptions can be real time
Challenge
Uncertainty
Critics
Lack of proper application
Brief
This can be applied to assume the
importance of physical activities in
the schools

RAPID PROTOTYPING
Outcome
Improve the areas required for
developing a proper solution
Challenge
Lack of prototyping speed
Critics
The experience can be used to
create effective and meaningful
conversation
Brief
Technique involved can be helped to
understand the topic at hand

CUSTOMER CO-CREATION
Outcome
Experience can be gained that can
help in effective team work
Challenge
Does not have collaboration
Critics
Participation is required in every
solution
Brief
Involves stakeholders

LEARNING LAUNCH
Outcome
Involves interested parties
Challenge
Resists in the development of tools
Critics
New achievements can be gained
Brief
Provides a summation of tools for
designing

CONCLUSION
• Value chain analysis can help in justifying the implementation
of physical activities in schools
• Balance between physical activities as well as theoretical
knowledge is needed
• The application of design-thinking tools can help in developing
proper physical activity

REFERENCE
 Chasanidou, D., Gasparini, A. A., & Lee, E. (2015). Design thinking methods and tools for
innovation. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 12-23).
Springer, Cham.
 Elsbach, K. D., & Stigliani, I. (2018). Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and
Framework for Future Research. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2274-2306.
 Huq, A., & Gilbert, D. (2017). All the world’sa stage: transforming entrepreneurship education
through design thinking. Education+ Training, 59(2), 155-170.
 Kolko, J. (2015). Design thinking comes of age. Routeledge
 Lewrick, M., & Link, P. (2015). Design Thinking Tools: Early Insights Accelerate Marketers’
Success. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 32(1), 40-51.
 Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through
cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938.
 Liedtka, J., Salzman, R., & Azer, D. (2017). Democratizing Innovation in Organizations: Teaching
Design Thinking to Non‐Designers. Design Management Review, 28(3), 49-55.
 Martelaro, N., Ganguly, S., Steinert, M., & Jung, M. (2015). The personal trait myth: a comparative
analysis of the innovation impact of design thinking tools and personal traits. In Design Thinking
Research (pp. 41-57). Springer, Cham