Development Methodology Assignment Sample
Added on 2021-04-17
7 Pages2087 Words45 Views
SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND MATHS, CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITYDevelopment Methodology/scenario2Assignment 1: Doing Ethics TechniqueYour NameStudent NumberWord Count:1000
Development Methodology/scenario2ITC506 Assessment Item 1- Marking SheetTotal Obtained Marks/100 & /15CriteriaStandardsMarksawardedAnalysis of the ethical dilemma using the Doing Ethics Technique(DET) (Value: 70%)HD: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, identifies all the ethical issues, evaluates all the options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and justifies why this option is the best using supporting arguments based on the literature.DI: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, lists all the ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and explains why this option is the best.CR: Answers all DET questions, lists most of the facts, identifies most of the non-ethical issues, lists most of the stakeholders, lists most of the ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and makes an attempt to explain why this option is thebest.PS: Answers some of the DET questions, lists a few facts, identifies a few non-ethical issues, lists a few stakeholders, lists a few ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these but without explaining why this option is the best.FL: Answers a few DET questions but fails to list important facts, fails to identify relevant non-ethical issues, fails to list important stakeholders, fails to identify the ethical issues and evaluates the options that seek to resolve them and does not select the best option or does not explain whythe option selected is the best.Writing & structure(Value 20%)HD: Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.DI: Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas.Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.Grammar & spelling accurate.CR: Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas.Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.PS: The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and structure, lacks clarity, and is not concise, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with some effort.FL: Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas.Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner.Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised.Grammar & spelling contains many errors.Referencing(Value 10%)HD: Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, andconforms exactly to APA style conventions.DI: Very good referencing, including reference list and citations.High quality references.CR:Good referencing, including reference list and citations. Good quality references.Your Name
Development Methodology/scenario2PS:Referencing is comprehensive, mostly accurate according to APA styleconventions, and demonstrates academic integrity. Some minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, etc) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or demonstration of academic integrity.FL: Sub-standard (or no) referencing. Poor quality (or no) references.Total MarksQ1. What's going on?The developer of the project is developing the project. During the development phase the client of the project needs some modifications in the requirement and development methodology. The client talks about the modifications with the developer overthe phone. The mentioned conversation between the client and the developer is noticed by the project director("Scenario 2: Development Methodology", 2018). The developer of the project says that client needs some modifications in the project which can be done easily and they are going to proceed with those changes.Q2. What are the facts?Client needs some modification in the project. Regarding this the client talks with thedeveloper of the project. The developer of the project understands the requirement of the client clearly and considers those changes as relevant and easy to be done ("Scenario 2: Development Methodology", 2018). Here the fact is that the developer of the project interacts with the client directly and takes decisions about the changes in project without informing the project director.Q3. What are the issues?The client of the project asks for the modification of the requirement with the developer of the project. The ethical issue concerns if the developer of the project should interact with the client directly and take decisions about the changes in the project without consulting the matter with the project director (Al-Saggaf, Burmeister & Weckert,2016). Theterms of agreement between the company and the client is known to the project director. Inorder to modify the requirement the terms in the agreement may be revised. In this situation the project director needs to handle the situation.Q4. Who is affected?Your Name
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
(PDF) Systems development methodologieslg...
|7
|2053
|44
Assignment on The Untested Systemlg...
|8
|2064
|46
ITC506 - Doing Ethics Techniques - Assignmentlg...
|6
|2373
|30
Information Technology Ethics Assignment | DETlg...
|6
|2059
|84
(PDF) Ethics and Information Technologieslg...
|8
|2135
|26
(Solved) Doing Ethics Technique: Assignmentlg...
|9
|2019
|217