Digital Forensic Evaluation

This presentation discusses the methods and models of digital forensic evaluation in criminal investigations. It highlights the advantages of using digital forensic in capturing important data and preventing cyber threats.

DIGITAL FORENSIC
EVALUATION

INTRODUCTION
 Digital forensic is the method of retrieving and analysis of data and files
which can be obtained from the various smart phones, tablets and
computers of the suspects.
 Helps in investigation and criminal proceedings.

DIGITAL FORENSIC AS SERVICE
 Use of digital forensic is increasing with the increase in the new
technology implementation in various fields.
 The data and files that are recovered can be used in the legal
proceedings [4].

TYPES OF DIGITAL FORENSIC
 Computer forensic
 Network forensic
 Mobile device forensic
 Digital image forensic
 Database forensic

MODELS OF DIGITAL FORENSIC
 Extended model for cybercrime investigation
 Systematic digital forensic model
 Digital forensic triage model

PROCESS OF DIGITAL FORENSIC APPLIED
IN INVESTIGATION
 The process is used in the investigation has mainly four sub-parts –
collection, examination, analysis and reporting.

ADVANTAGES OF USING DIGITAL
FORENSIC
 Helps in capturing important data present in the computers and devices which might
be helpful in the investigations
 Efficiently finds out suspects and criminals from different parts of the globe.
 Complicated cases like e-mail spamming and other cyber threats can be prevented by
digital forensic.

CONCLUSION
The presentation on the digital forensic evaluation states the various
methods by which the digital forensic is used in the modern criminal
investigation processes and the various models of the digital forensic that
are applicable to the process of legal proceedings. The advantages of the
implementation of digital forensic in the modern investigations have been
discussed. Thus the process of digital investigation should be adapted with
the emergence of new technologies.

REFERENCES
 [1] C. Tassone, B. Martini, K.K.R. Choo and J. Slay. Mobile device forensics: A snapshot. Trends and Issues
in Crime and Criminal Justice, (460), p.1, 2013.
 [2] D.T. Dang-Nguyen, C. Pasquini, V. Conotter and G. Boato. Raise: A raw images dataset for digital image
forensics. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (pp. 219-224). ACM, March, 2015.
 [3] R. Hegarty, D.J. Lamb and A. Attwood. Digital Evidence Challenges in the Internet of Things. In INC (pp.
163-172), 2014.
 [4] R.B. Van Baar, H.M.A. Van Beek and E.J. Van Eijk. Digital Forensics as a Service: A game changer.
Digital Investigation, 11, pp.S54-S62, 2014.
 [5] S. Watson and A. Dehghantanha. Digital forensics: the missing piece of the internet of things promise.
Computer Fraud & Security, 2016(6), pp.5-8, 2016.
 [6] T.J. Holt, A.M. Bossler and K.C. Seigfried-Spellar. Cybercrime and digital forensics: An introduction.
Routledge, 2017.
 [7] V. Roussev, C. Quates, and R. Martell. Real-time digital forensics and triage. Digital Investigation, 10(2),
pp.158-167, 2013.
 [8] X. Du, N.A. Le-Khac and M. Scanlon. Evaluation of digital forensic process models with respect to
digital forensics as a service. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.01730, 2017.

THANK YOU