Ask a question from expert
APPL710/910 Critical Review Essay Assignment
13 Pages5091 Words335 Views
Critical Review Essay Assignment (APPL710/910 Critical Review Essay Assignment)
Added on 2020-05-04
APPL710/910 Critical Review Essay Assignment
Critical Review Essay Assignment (APPL710/910 Critical Review Essay Assignment)
Added on 2020-05-04
BookmarkShareRelated Documents
Running Head: EXPLORING DISCOURSE IN CONTENT AND ACTION1EXPLORING DISCOURSE IN CONTENT AND ACTIONName:Institution:Course Code:
EXPLORING DISCOURSE IN CONTENT AND ACTION2Article summary and critical review.Exploring Discourse in Content and Action.The concept of exploring discourse in content and action fall under APPL910 in the study unit. This particular unit has a core objective on different discourse analysis such as spoken, written aswell as multimodal discourse (Flowerdew, 2014). Collectively, the discourse analysis is based ona range of real-life situations, domains as well as settings. Typically, this type of discourse can be traced back in the historical, institutional as well as in domestic contexts (Locke, 2004). Manyscholars and researchers have used discourse analysis research and practice so as to focus on explanatory, interpretivist along with descriptive analysis on the methodologies associated exploring discourse in content and action.Critically, discourse analysis is based on interdisciplinary concept that involves semiotics, discourse as well as linguistics, analysis (Marylene, 2014). It main concern is articulated by theories and researches on social processes as well as in social change. By emphasizing so much on political analysis of policies along with many practices in the society, the aspects of critical discourse analysis indicate how scholars and researchers contribute to reproduction of dominant discourses (Maslow, 2013). This discourse analysis in content and action assert a desire for positive social, cultural economic as well as political change. From this particular point of view, a distinct understanding of what happens in a given interactional episode tend to be contingent aslong as one is able to understand the most appropriate place in the desired macro societal context(Paltridge, 2012). Therefore, a lot of information concerning the concept of discourse in content an action has been analyzed by different researchers and scholars in relation to the focus of the research and the point of interest of that particular researcher.The main focus of this particular paper is to critically review the relevant journal articles on exploring discourse in content and action (Rogers, 2011). The following journal articles will be used in this report.1Sarangi, S., Clarke, A. Bennett, K., & Howell, L. (2003). Categorization practices acrossprofessional genres: some analytical insights from genetic counselling. In S.Sarangi & T.Van Leeuwen (eds) Applied linguistics and communities of practice. London. Continuum(pp.150-168).
EXPLORING DISCOURSE IN CONTENT AND ACTION32Roberts, C. & Campbell, S. (2005). Fitting stories into boxes. Journal of AppliedLinguistics 2(1), (pp.45-72).3Sarangi, S. & Candlin, C. (2003). Categorization and explanation of risk: a discourseanalytical perspective. Health, Risk & Society, 5(2), (pp.115-124). In this case, the three peer reviewed journal articles for academic work will reviewed. (1)Categorization practices across professional genres: some analytical insights from genetic counselling. In S.Sarangi & T. Van Leeuwen (Eds) Applied linguistics and communities of practice by Sarangi, Clarke, Bannett & Howell. (2003), (2) Fitting stories into boxes. Journal of AppliedLinguistics by Roberts & Campbell (2005) and (3) Categorization and explanation of risk: a discourse analytical perspective. Health, Risk & Society by Sarangi & Candlin (2003).The three articles have been selected so as to address the objectives on theme 2 in connection to exploring recourse in content and action. In that case, the three-academic peer reviewed journal articles indicated above have attempted to critically review, analyze and emphasize on the core concept of discourse in content and action in similar definition as well as with distinct general overview.To begin with, we review article (1). Categorization practices across professional genres: some analytical insights from genetic counselling. In S.Sarangi & T. Van Leeuwen (Eds) Applied linguistics and communities of practice by Sarangi, Clarke, Bannett & Howell. (2003). This article indicates the methods or models used to approach discourse analysis. According to the article, different analysts adopt the most appropriate methodologies and procedures. They focus on the topic and research questions along with their main point of focus. The researcher tends to justify their own methodologies so as to express the best point of views and interests (Sarangi, Clarke, Bennett & Howell, 2003). According to the assertions of this article there has been debate in discourse research. Discourse in content and action rumble on despite the many challenges. The proponents of the traditions tend to challenge the claims of other researchers anddifferent viewpoints.
EXPLORING DISCOURSE IN CONTENT AND ACTION4The author of this article focusses on debate raised by different researchers and theorists in their diverse nature of domains, disciples, nature of data along with discourse traditions. Based on the arguments of this article, the disciplines that diversify from discourse analysis include sociology,psychology, politics, social policy and cultural studies (Sarangi, Clarke, Bennett & Howell, 2003). In the same note, the domains in this case include social relation, sense making, culture, mind and social interaction. This implies that the relationship between these domains and disciplines has a perfect positive correlation. The research approach used in this article is mixed research approach. This is because it has applied both qualitative and quantitative data methods. The type of data considered in this article is gathered via interview, group focus, political speeches, conversations occurring naturally, media representations, documents as well as experimental records. In conclusion, the content of this article focusses on improving social and health care services, it has expounded on critical thinking based on different views of social aspects (Sarangi, Clarke, Bennett & Howell, 2003). It is therefore appropriate to select the most appropriate research methodologies by explicitly applying the concepts of discourse, discourse analysis and discourse in content and action demonstrated from the traditions of discourse analysis. By reviewing article (2), fitting stories into boxes. Journal of AppliedLinguistics by Roberts & Campbell (2005), the growth of critical discourse analysis is the main focus. By the assertion of this article, discourse analysis affirm itself as an aspect of social science as well as humanity which has been applied to offer scientific approaches to language study since it has been manifested across the different cohorts of people (Roberts & Campbell, 2005). According to Roberts and Campbell, discourse analysis is close to intellectual orthodoxy. The article assert that critical discourse analysis is a theory that need to be utilized in inclusive sense. However, discourse analysis has been subjected to risk of over-generalization but this article aims at exploring the specific usefulness of critical discourse analysis and prove its necessity to researchers and other scholars (Roberts & Campbell, 2005). This has been demonstrated by a close relationship between content and action with discourse analysis as well as from the aspects of power such as inequality, dominance and political struggle. The article is about how critical discourse analysis relate to language and power. It also indicatesin small extent the relationship between struggle and conflict. The article indicates how critical discourse analysis incorporate the concept of microanalysis of texts. This has been achieved by
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
(PDF) Cyber Security Challenges in Smart Citieslg...
|8
|1937
|152