Disputes Between the Company and Its Employees
11 Pages1806 Words24 Views
Added on 2022-08-18
Disputes Between the Company and Its Employees
Added on 2022-08-18
ShareRelated Documents
Running Head: CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author’s Note
CASE STUDY
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author’s Note
CASE STUDY1
Table of Contents
Scenario 1: Courts and ADR...........................................................................................................1
Issue:............................................................................................................................................1
Rule:.............................................................................................................................................1
Application:.................................................................................................................................1
Conclusion:..................................................................................................................................2
Scenario 2: Constitutional Rights....................................................................................................2
Issue:............................................................................................................................................2
Rule:.............................................................................................................................................2
Application:.................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion:..................................................................................................................................3
Scenario 3: Torts..............................................................................................................................3
Issue:............................................................................................................................................3
Rule:.............................................................................................................................................3
Application:.................................................................................................................................4
Conclusion:..................................................................................................................................4
Scenario 7: Negligence....................................................................................................................5
Issue:............................................................................................................................................5
Rule:.............................................................................................................................................5
Table of Contents
Scenario 1: Courts and ADR...........................................................................................................1
Issue:............................................................................................................................................1
Rule:.............................................................................................................................................1
Application:.................................................................................................................................1
Conclusion:..................................................................................................................................2
Scenario 2: Constitutional Rights....................................................................................................2
Issue:............................................................................................................................................2
Rule:.............................................................................................................................................2
Application:.................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion:..................................................................................................................................3
Scenario 3: Torts..............................................................................................................................3
Issue:............................................................................................................................................3
Rule:.............................................................................................................................................3
Application:.................................................................................................................................4
Conclusion:..................................................................................................................................4
Scenario 7: Negligence....................................................................................................................5
Issue:............................................................................................................................................5
Rule:.............................................................................................................................................5
CASE STUDY2
Application:.................................................................................................................................6
Conclusion:..................................................................................................................................7
REFERENCES:...............................................................................................................................8
Application:.................................................................................................................................6
Conclusion:..................................................................................................................................7
REFERENCES:...............................................................................................................................8
CASE STUDY3
Scenario 1: Courts and ADR
Issue:
The issue in the case is whether Watson is wrongfully terminated.
Rule:
Disputes between the company and its employees may arise on several grounds. Because
of the cost of litigation and the time involved due to procedures and management, it is more
common for the employment contract to include the provision for alternate dispute resolution
systems including mediation as dispute resolution system.
The employees are although protected by law against the termination by the employers at
unlawful or wrongful terms (Perritt 2019). These terms include the following:
Implied Contract
Public policy
Good faith and fair dealing
In Li vs. Canberra Industries [2012] 134 Conn App 448, it was held by the court that when
the employee was fired because she refused to make unethical calls as ordered by her boss, such
termination was unlawful.
Application:
Applying the provisions for wrongful termination of an employee, it can be explained
that the employee was terminated on the ground of breach of contract which had specifically
mentioned that the office properties must be used for the official purpose only. Applying the
Scenario 1: Courts and ADR
Issue:
The issue in the case is whether Watson is wrongfully terminated.
Rule:
Disputes between the company and its employees may arise on several grounds. Because
of the cost of litigation and the time involved due to procedures and management, it is more
common for the employment contract to include the provision for alternate dispute resolution
systems including mediation as dispute resolution system.
The employees are although protected by law against the termination by the employers at
unlawful or wrongful terms (Perritt 2019). These terms include the following:
Implied Contract
Public policy
Good faith and fair dealing
In Li vs. Canberra Industries [2012] 134 Conn App 448, it was held by the court that when
the employee was fired because she refused to make unethical calls as ordered by her boss, such
termination was unlawful.
Application:
Applying the provisions for wrongful termination of an employee, it can be explained
that the employee was terminated on the ground of breach of contract which had specifically
mentioned that the office properties must be used for the official purpose only. Applying the
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
The Fourth Amendment of the USlg...
|6
|757
|15
Assignment on Provisions of Search and Seizurelg...
|5
|666
|85
Illinois vs. Wardlow: Case Study, Decision, and Fourth Amendment Rightslg...
|5
|958
|408
Essay Business Law English Legal Systemlg...
|13
|4363
|58
Anonymous Tips Illegal or Criminal Activity Case Analysis 2022lg...
|16
|2850
|20
Insurance Fraud and the Role of the Civil Lawlg...
|14
|1618
|16