(Solved) Doing Ethics Technique: Assignment

Added on - 21 Apr 2021

  • 9

    Pages

  • 2019

    Words

  • 52

    Views

  • 0

    Downloads

Trusted by +2 million users,
1000+ happy students everyday
Showing pages 1 to 3 of 9 pages
SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND MATHS, CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITYIT Ethical Dilemma / Early LaunchAssignment 1: Doing Ethics TechniqueYour NameStudent NumberWord Count:1000
Title of you case study/scenarioITC506 Assessment Item 1- Marking SheetTotal Obtained Marks/100 & /15CriteriaStandardsMarksawardedAnalysisof theethicaldilemmausing theDoingEthicsTechnique(DET)(Value:70%)HD: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, identifies all the ethical issues,evaluates all the options that seek to resolve them and selects the bestoption from these and justifies why this option is the best usingsupporting arguments based on the literature.DI: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, lists all the ethical issues andoptions that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from theseand explains why this option is the best.CR: Answers all DET questions, lists most of the facts, identifies most ofthe non-ethical issues, lists most of the stakeholders, lists most of theethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the bestoption from these and makes an attempt to explain why this option is thebest.PS: Answers some of the DET questions, lists a few facts, identifies a fewnon-ethical issues, lists a few stakeholders, lists a few ethical issues andoptions that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from thesebut without explaining why this option is the best.FL: Answers a few DET questions but fails to list important facts, fails toidentify relevant non-ethical issues, fails to list important stakeholders,fails to identify the ethical issues and evaluates the options that seek toresolve them and does not select the best option or does not explain whythe option selected is the best.Writing &structure(Value20%)HD: Language features and structures are used to convey meaningeffectively, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to theaudience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuationerrors.Your Name
Title of you case study/scenarioDI: Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas.Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.Grammar & spelling accurate.CR: Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas.Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/documenttype. Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.PS: The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar, word choice,and structure, lacks clarity, and is not concise, but the meaning isapparent to the reader with some effort.FL: Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas.Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner.Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised.Grammar & spelling contains many errors.Referencing(Value10%)HD: Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, andconforms exactly to APA style conventions.DI: Very good referencing, including reference list and citations.High quality references.CR:Good referencing, including reference list and citations. Good qualityreferences.PS:Referencing is comprehensive, mostly accurate according to APAstyle conventions, and demonstrates academic integrity. Some minorerrors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics,punctuation, etc) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of thesource, or demonstration of academic integrity.FL: Sub-standard (or no) referencing. Poor quality (or no) references.TotalMarksYour Name
desklib-logo
You’re reading a preview
Preview Documents

To View Complete Document

Click the button to download
Subscribe to our plans

Download This Document