logo

Doing ethics technique (DET): Assignment

   

Added on  2021-04-21

7 Pages1892 Words33 Views
Development Methodology/Scenario2Assignment 1: Doing Ethics TechniqueYour NameStudent NumberSCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND MATHS, CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITYWord Count: 900Q1. What's going on?
Doing ethics technique (DET): Assignment_1
Development Methodology/Scenario 2This particular case study is about a scenario, called “Development Methodology”. Thescenario mainly demonstrates a junior developer of software is talking over phone with his client(Scenario 2: Development Methodology, 2018). The client wants the company to craft few of thechanges within the software and junior developer of software has agreed to do so. Meanwhile,the manager of project enters in that room and queries the junior developer about the phone call.The software developer informs that the client has asked for some changes and he wants thesoftware within the given time. The project manager is surprised to hear this; however, the juniordeveloper says that he will be able to do so. Q2. What are the facts?The significant facts of the case of “Development Methodology” are given below:i) The junior developer is an enthusiastic and hard working employee in the organization.ii) The client of a specific project has said to change the software accordingly to his newrequirements. iii) The client has not provided extra time for the project and he wants the software withindeadline (Slade & Prinsloo, 2013).iv) The developer of software has agreed in making all the alterations asked by the client.v) The junior developer of software has agreed to make all the changes in deadline.vi) He has not informed his senior, the project manager about all the facts. Q3. What are the issues (non-ethical)?The first and the foremost unethical issue that this case study comprises of is that thesenior of the developer screams on the junior developer. This is absolutely non ethical as nosenior employee has the right to scream on his sub ordinates even he is making major mistakes inhis work (Ford & Richardson, 2013). Another important unethical issue in the case study is thatthe senior employee is not feeling guilty of his crime. Rather, he only oozes out his frustration onthe junior employee. There is a high chance that the junior developer might be feeling low andnegatively motivated. Q4. Who is affected?“Development Methodology” case study is extremely important to understand the ethicalor non ethical scenario. Few people are solely affected in the case. The most affected person isthe developer. His senior has screamed upon him or rather has insulted him in front of otheremployees (Mannay & Morgan, 2015). The second most affected person in the case is the ownerYour Name
Doing ethics technique (DET): Assignment_2
Development Methodology/Scenario 2of the organization. He would be losing a sincere and hard working employee if the developerdecides to resign from the company. The third affected person is the client of the project, as hewould not be getting the software according to his requirements. Q5. What are the ethical issues and their implications?The very first moral issue in this case is the customer satisfaction. The junior developerhas decided to satisfy the client by doing all the changes. Moreover, he has decided to completethe entire work within deadline (Bell, 2014). The second important ethical issue in the case is thefulfilling all the requirements of the project. When any project is given to an organization, it isthe core responsibility of that organization to meet all the requirements. The third ethical issuehere is the proper execution of the project. The software should run properly and it should not beerroneous.Q6. What can be done about it?The above mentioned issues can be resolved by undertaking few steps. The first option inthis case study is to forward these types of call to the senior manager of project and take properguidance before proceeding with such tasks. These types of changes in software usually incurhuge cost, as more resources are needed here (Mintz, 2016). The client should be paying moremoney for the demanded changes. Moreover, the project manager should discuss with thedeveloper about the changes and motivate and guide him to complete with his work. This type ofmotivation is extremely important for any employee to excel in his work. Q7. What are the options?The very first option here is the requesting of the manager of project to the respectivedeveloper for forwarding these types of calls to him directly and thus take proper guidance forproceeding with work. The second alternative would be that manager of project screams on thedeveloper of software. The third important option would be that the project manager isencouraging the activity of the developer and thus makes the project successful (Gray, 2016). Q8. Which option is the best and why?The best or the perfect option from the above mentioned options is the encouragement ofprogram director about the action of the developer. As the client has demanded for newrequirement just before the product launch, it is his duty to change the software and thus thiswould be the best option for this particular case study of “Development Methodology” (CoghlanYour Name
Doing ethics technique (DET): Assignment_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Development Methodology - ITC506 - Doing Ethics Technique
|6
|2126
|105

Development Methodology Assignment
|7
|2076
|38

Information Technology Ethics Assignment (Solved)
|5
|1266
|21

A Client's Request for Some Changes in Software
|7
|2242
|226

Ethical Issues in Scenario 2: Development Methodology
|7
|1321
|364

Doing Ethics Techniques : Doc
|6
|1296
|32