Don't be evil Google Google

Running head: ESSAY 1
ETHICS ANDGOVERNANCE
STUDENT DETAILS
3/3/2019

ESSAY 2
Topic: Don’t be evil Google
Google is one of the well-known and much-loved companies in the world. Google is mainly
identified as the net search engine. In the addition of this, it renders the great set of service and
product related to the internet. These internet services and internet products include Google Map,
Google video call, Google newsflash, Google broadcast, Google image, Google phone, Google
Group and Google book. These products and services of Google make this very famous
international website. The mission statement of Google is that ‘To manage the data of the world
and create this globally reachable and meaningful.’ However also being the Googlers mean
keeping themselves to the high probable norms for moral business conducts (Letendre, 2017).
Moreover, in year 2006, Google created the high profile acquisition of YouTube site that was
two years old and not profitable. In the following parts of this essay, approaches of changing the
motto ‘don’t evil Google’ and effects of elimination of motto of Google, is discussed and
critically examined.
When the various corporations have moral codes of conduct to regulate the behavior, it is
claimed by the Google to have created ‘Don’t be evil’ the vital pillar of recognition of them, and
part of the self-proclaimed main principles and beliefs. As per the report of Gizmodo, the motto
"Don't be evil", somewhat, which has been the part of the code of conduct of Google, are no
longer exist to any further extent. It is claimed by them that the words 'Don't be evil' has
eliminated by Google from the corporate code of conduct of Google that the corporation makes
distribution on the inside to the workers of company, for a while in late April or near the
beginning of May. This is documented by the Way back Machine. From the year 2000, the motto
“Don’t be evil” has been part of the code of conduct of company. Further, while in the year
2015, Google was identified under the new parent organization Alphabet, this new parent

ESSAY 3
company assumed the slightly familiar type of the motto, “do right things.” But, Google kept the
real “don’t be evil” language till the previous certain days. The phrase has been severely
incorporated in the corporate culture of Google, so much so that the version of saying has
worked as the passwords of Wi-Fi on the shuttle used by the Google to convey the workers to the
headquarter of mount view, resources told Gizmodo.
Moreover, the phase sometimes directs the arguments in the corporation. The four thousand
workers complaining the works of Google for the AI Project Maven of Pentagon referred to the
motto to focus on the point that how an agreement differed from the beliefs and principles of the
company (Martin, 2017). The parent company of Google, Alphabet, also followed and still
preserves the alternatives of the maxim in a form of 'Do right things'. The copy of Code of
Conduct page of Google from 21st April on Way back Machine displays the ancient type. It
begins with the following-
'Don't be evil' Googler normally relates these words to how the company serves its operators.
However, 'Don't be evil' is an extra than this. Undoubtedly, this is regarding rendering the
operators impartial entree to the data, making focus on the requirements and providing them the
great service and product can. However, this is in respect of the doing the correct things more
commonly-- adopting the laws, performing morally, and considering co-employees with
politeness and admiration (Ajamian, 2016).
"The Code of Conduct of Google is one of the processes company puts 'Don't be evil' in the
practice. This is created around the acknowledgement that all thing company does in relation to
the work at Google would be, and shall be, evaluated against the high probable standards of
moral business conduct. The company sets the slab, which high for practical reasons and self-

ESSAY 4
improving reasons. The commitments of company to the high norms help the system in
employing the skilled and knowledgeable persons, create huge effective products, and fascinate
the honest operators (Conger, 2018). Faith and common respect between the workers and
operators are the basis of the company’s success, and they are something the company requires
to get daily."
Furthermore, the complete first paragraph has been removed from new Code of Conduct page of
Google that now starts with:
"The Code of Conduct of Google is one of the methods the company places values of Google in
the practice. This is created around the acknowledgement that all thing company does in relation
to the work at Google would be, and shall be, evaluated against the high probable standards of
moral business conduct (Baker and Tang, 2015). The company sets the slab, which high for
practical reasons and self-improving reasons. The commitments of company to the high norms
help the system in employing the skilled and knowledgeable persons, create huge effective
products, and fascinate the honest operators. Faith and common respect between the workers and
operators are the basis of the company’s success, and they are something the company requires
to get daily." When the expression no long leads the corporate code of conduct of company, one
remnant rests at the conclusion."And recall that don't be evil, and if anybody see something that
person think is not correct, then express it."
In my mind, the corporation code of conduct represents the morals, values and beliefs of the
company (Python and Go, 2015). In this way, eliminating the motto “Don't be evil" from the
code of conduct, can provide us the hints to the way, where Google is moving. I believe that
there is the long and storied past of the business going of the way to be great corporate residents

ESSAY 5
in the interest of developing good will. Moreover, since the year 1800, the Quaker business
approaches state the significance of keeping individuals over the profits. I think that not only is
this the ethical manner of conducting business, this also makes sure that customers lastly put
faith on the entities they support. In this way, in the real open market, this is only the manner, for
the successful corporation to run and succeed. That’s all well and good, but some argue that
Google has trampled its core founding principle in numerous ways over the years.
This supports the idea that while we develop technology in the vacuums, disengaged from the
actuality where the individual actually reside, we are too likely to spend the energy creating
certain theoretical idea of the prospective life in place of stating the pain, unfairness, injustice
and inequality around the people in the present time. The technologies become the manner of
absconding the issues or problems of globe whether throughout the practical actuality or huge
Silicon Valley reserve option package, in place of involving with them. However, the do not do
evil consent does not yet enquire the programmers of Google to assess the objectives of the
technologies, only to execute the fundamental "checksum," or fault improvement, for
immorality. This proves that it is not sufficient for the corporation that seems devoted to posting
the human awareness to the clouds (Grogan and Brett, 2017). It does not matter that how many
robot warrior we have securing the practical actual servers from the individuals we put down
(Brett, Pilcher and Sell, 2017).
I am not saying in against of the technologies or that people do less with this. Quite the contrary,
I am debating we do more. This is not sufficient to mechanize and digitize the societies, and
make worse the issues or difficulties through the modern sources. It is required by us go above
the mere evasion of the deliberately malevolence and in its place look for to do fine. It may
include really turning over and recreating certain establishments and the procedures from the

ESSAY 6
ground up (Carbone, 2018). In this way, I can say that it is the actual prospective of the digital
technologies. For recovering the concepts and values, which can have appeared not possible
before and notice whether we may make feel them in the present time in this changing world
(Ferguson, et. al, 2017). In the addition of this, it could be argued that Google has properly
discarded the motto "Don't be evil" and that small counterpart would be not capable to contend in
against of the big counterpart. My other concern is that customers, who did not notice this
declaration, would be uninformed that they are now seeing at paid advertisement and that the
peak result are no longer determined exclusively depended on significance but as an alternative
would be influenced in accordance with the corporation made payment the most (Green and
Vandall-Walker, 2017).
In this way, the question arises that what is the Google at the present that it no more appears to
suppose in “not being evil?” Is this just other company performing something to create the buck?
In the case it is so, it would not be without the significances for the upcoming time of the
corporation (Cuthbertson, 2018). Although as proofed by the letter authorised or confirmed by
the various workers of the Google, going down the way, can mean less attention from the
developers to do functions for the corporation. In the old TED talk, the marketing expert and
writer of ‘Start with Why’, Mr Simon Sinek raised the problem of corporations requiring to
render the consumers and operators something where to consider the objective that align with the
motive and principles of user base (Routledge, Abeyta and Roylance, 2016). All things
considered, it is what pushes everybody, both consumers and workers to make the corporation
really great (Curwen, 2018).
In my opinion, it is what creates the entity for an example Apple so appreciated by the consumer
base, and this is what has created people loves Google for the “Don’t Be Evil” motto in an old

ESSAY 7
time (Erwin, 2011). In this way, I believe that all of it can be in risk, if Google decides to give up
the "Don't be evil" motto. It can also be seen that how the cool modern technology of the
corporation is no longer taken with just admire and the hopefulness, however also skepticism and
great disparagement. It is believed by e that this tendency can get worse to disadvantage of the
Google, in the case where more person begin considering that the corporation is no more seeing
after them or making efforts to do excellent with its technology, but just desiring to do something
to look for the profits (Cassin and Syrotinski, 2017). Another key thing to remember that don’t
be evil has been commercial recognition of the Google for the long period, however now it is not
longer factual. As well as whether the people would like the new Google or not that cannot cause
to not being evil any longer remains to be observed, however certain of this new moves by now
aim at the more and more disturbing and unethical direction for an entity (Shane and
Wakabayashi, 2018).
As per the above discussion and arguments, it can b concluded that Google has not eliminated
the clause (Stevens, 2008). Google has eliminated this motto from the preamble, resulting in
more concentration to the word’s admiration. However, this still remains at the last part of the
documents as earlier than. The new code of conduct of company puts focus on the respect. The
respect has been great part of corporation code of conduct of Google. However, due to the
placement in document underneath don’t be evil motto; it appeared as it this was in subsequent
place (Cadwalladr, 2016).

ESSAY 8
References
Ajamian, P.C. (2016) An evil clinical twin: two conditions present with similar clinical findings;
but imaging reveals they don't exist on the same family tree, explaining divergent
responses. Review of Optometry, 153(4), pp. 26-27.
Baker, J.S. and Tang, L. (2015) Exploring dialectical tensions for institutional maintenance: A
case of Google and its censored Chinese search engine. International Journal of
Communication, 9, p.20.
Brett, J., Pilcher, L. and Sell, L.C. (2017) A new approach to China: Google and censorship in
the Chinese market. Kellogg School of Management Cases, pp. 1-18.
Cadwalladr, C. (2016) Google, democracy and the truth about internet search. The
Guardian, 4(12), p. 2016.
Carbone C (2018) ‘Google revises code of conduct, removes ‘Don’t be evil’, New York Post,
https://nypost.com/2018/05/22/google-revises-code-of-conduct-removes-dont-be-evil/
[Accessed 4 January 2019]
Cassin, B. and Syrotinski, M. (2017) Google Me: One-click Democracy. New York: Fordham
University Press.
Conger K (2018) ‘Google Removes 'Don't Be Evil' Clause From Its Code Of Conduct’,
https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2018/05/google-removes-dont-be-evil-clause-from-its-code-of-
conduct/ [Accessed 4 January 2019]

ESSAY 9
Curwen, P. (2018) Google: A regular column on the information industries. Digital Policy,
Regulation and Governance, 20(2), pp. 191-194.
Cuthbertson A (2018) ‘Google quietly removes ‘Don’t be Evil’ Preface from Code of Conduct’,
The Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/google-dont-
be-evil-code-conduct-removed-alphabet-a8361276.html [Accessed 4 January 2019]
Erwin, P. M. (2011). Corporate codes of conduct: The effects of code content and quality on
ethical performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 535-548.
Ferguson, C.J., Colon-Motas, K., Esser, C., Lanie, C., Purvis, S. and Williams, M. (2017) The
(not so) evil within? Agency in video game choice and the impact of violent content. Simulation
& Gaming, 48(3), pp.329-337.
Green, C. and Vandall-Walker, V. (2017) A necessary evil? Patients’ experiences receiving tube
feeding in acute care. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 32(4), pp. 516-525.
Grogan, C. and Brett, J. (2017) Google and the government of China: A case study in cross-
cultural negotiations. Kellogg School of Management Cases, pp. 1-15.
Letendre, L.A. (2017) Google, It Ain't Ford: Why the United States Needs a Better Approach to
Leveraging the Robotics Industry. AFL Rev., 77, p.51.
Martin, K. (2017) Google, Inc., in China. Darden Business Publishing Cases, pp. 1-19.
Python, J. and Go, P.H.P. (2015) Google App Engine. Development, 1, p.35.

ESSAY 10
Routledge, C., Abeyta, A.A. and Roylance, C. (2016) An existential function of evil: The effects
of religiosity and compromised meaning on belief in magical evil forces. Motivation and
Emotion, 40(5), pp.681-688.
Shane, S. and Wakabayashi, D. (2018) ‘The Business of War’: Google Employees Protest Work
for the Pentagon. The New York Times, 4(04).
Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behaviour.
Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 601-609.