ECO 101: Absolute and Comparative Advantage, Demand Curve, Marginal and Average Product, Zero Profit
Verified
Added on 2023/06/03
|10
|1708
|209
AI Summary
This article discusses the concepts of absolute and comparative advantage, demand curve, marginal and average product, and zero profit in ECO 101. It includes diagrams and tables to explain the concepts.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ECO 101 Eco 101 Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note+
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2ECO 101 Answer 1: CompanySteel (tons per labour hour) Sugar per labour (tons per labour hour) Total hours of labour AustralianCompany ABC 4610 US Company XYZ2110 Table 1: Absolute Advantage The above figure states that Australia and US has same hours of available labour. Both countriesproducesteelandSugar.However,ABCCompanyhasabsoluteadvantagein producing sugar while XYZ Company has absolute advantage in producing steel1. Hence, the initial part of the given statement is false. According to absolute advantage theory, Australian Company ABC would specialise in sugar production while US Company XYZ needs to specialise in steel production. However, David Ricardo provided the concept of comparative advantage. Based on this concept, a country may become specialise to produce any commodity if it has lower opportunity costandhighercomparativeadvantage2.Hence,tounderstandthatwhichcompanywill specialise in which country, it is essential to calculate comparative advantage. CompanySteel (tons per labour hour) Sugar per labour (tons per labour hour) Total hours of labour AustralianCompany ABC 4/6 = 0.676/4 = 1.510 US Company XYZ2/1 = 2½ = 0.510 Table 2: Comparative Advantage 1MaryamAlmasifard1andSasanTorabzadehKhorasani,‘RelationshipBetweenDomesticProductionin Agricultural and Industrial Sectors and Purchasing Power by Controlling for International Trade Variables (Iran) ‘ (2017) 7(4)International Journal of Economics and Financial, 244, 253. 2Andrei A. Levchenko and Jing Zhang,‘The evolution of comparative advantage: Measurement and welfare implications’ (2016)(78)Journal of Monetary Economics, 96,111
3ECO 101 According to above diagram, Australian Company ABC has comparative advantage in producing steel while US Company XYZ has comparative advantage in producing sugar. Thus, ABC will specialise in producing steel and XYZ will specialise in producing sugar. Thus, the given statement becomes false as it considers absolute advantage theory instead of comparative advantage. Answer 2: The given statement related to demand curve is true. In general, the demand law states that price of any commodity have inverse relationship with demand. This implies that increase in price can reduce the quantity demanded for the product. The opposite situation can also occur when price of the product goes down3. A negatively sloped demand curve represents this opposite relation. On the contrary, a positively sloped demand curve generates when price and quantity demanded of a product increases at a same time4. This situation can be occurred for Giffen goods and shares of companies and so on. A diagrammatical representation can describe this situation precisely. 3Rabah Amiry , Philip Ericksonz and Jim Jin, ‘On the microeconomic foundations of linear demand for differentiated products’ (2017) (169)Journal of Economic Theory, 641,665. 4Thomas M. Fullerton, Ileana M. Resendez and Adam G. Walke, ‘Upward sloping demand for a normal good? Residential electricity in Arkansas’ (2015) 5(4)International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 1065,1072.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ECO 101 Price O P0 P1 Q0Q1 Quantity demanded D Source: (created by author) In the above diagram, price of a product increases from P0 to P1 and consequently demand for the product also increases from Q0 to Q1. This positive relation between price and quantity demanded generates an upward rising demand curve, D, which has positive slope. Answer 3: The statement is true that if the marginal product decreases, the average product should decrease. This statement can be described with the law of diminishing returns. The law related to diminishing marginal return can establish the relation between marginal product and average product. Marginal product of any input implies the increase of total product due to one unit increase of this input while other inputs are remained constant. Average product related to any input, one the other side, represents total product divided by the Figure1: Positively sloped demand curve
5ECO 101 MP AP Marginal product and Average product Quantity of input O A amount of this input employed5. Based on the diminishing law, average product and marginal product increase at the initial phase. However, marginal product reaches to its maximum point at first and then it starts to decline. Average product reaches to its highest point later and at that point it intersects with diminishing portion of marginal product curve6. After this point average product curve also starts to decrease. This relation can be described with the help of following diagram. Source: (created by author) Figure 2 represents that after point A, both average product curve and marginal product curve has declined together. Furthermore, marginal product curve starts to decline before average 5Ballard Timothy, Gillian Yeo, Andrew Neal, and Simon Farrell. ‘Departures from optimality when pursuing multiple approach or avoidance goals’ (2016) 101(7)Journal of Applied Psychology, 1056. 6Eckel Carsten, Leonardo Iacovone, Beata Javorcik, and Peter Neary. ‘Multi-product firms at home and away: Cost- versus quality-based competence’ (2015) 95(2)Journal of International Economics, 216,232. Figure2: Marginal Product and Average Product
6ECO 101 product curve. Hence, from there it can be stated that if marginal product decreases, average product should decrease. Answer 4: The given statement states that a firm, which is making zero profits, should leave the industry. This statement is false. Zero profit occurs when total revenue and total cost of a firm becomes equal. Hence, normal profit represents the minimum profit level that a company needs to sustain within the industry. Zero profit of the firm arises when firm uses its resources efficiently. During this situation, a firm operates at the minimum point of long run average cost curve. However, zero profit does not imply that the firm earns no money7. In a perfectly competitive market, firms can earn zero economic profit during short-run and long-run. During short–run, firms earn excess profit and this attracts other firms to enter into the market. On the contrary, if firms incur loss in short-run then some of them can leave the market8. Thus, in long-run, all existing firms earn zero profits only. Hence, this means that these firms efficiently utilise resources. Thus, they will not leave the industry. 7Simshauser Paul, and Jude Ariyaratnam. ‘What is normal profit for power generation?’ (2014) 6(2)Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 152,178. 8Shirai Kenji, and Yoshinori Amano. ‘CHARACTERISTIC SIMILARITY OF PRODUCTION KEY ELEMENTS GREATLY AFFECTING PROFIT OF A PRODUCTIVE BUSINESS’ (2018) 14(5)INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1929,1946.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7ECO 101 MC AC AR=MR= P Revenues and Costs QuantityO Zero Profit Source: (created by author) The above diagram represents the condition of zero profit. In this situation, the average total cost curve intersects with average total revenue and marginal revenue curve. Thus, cost equates with revenue and the firm does not earn any excess profit or incurs any cost. Hence, it can efficiently perform in the industry. Figure3: Zero profit condition
8ECO 101 References: Andrei A. Levchenko and Jing Zhang,‘The evolution of comparative advantage: Measurement and welfare implications’ (2016)(78)Journal of Monetary Economics, 96,111. Ballard Timothy, Gillian Yeo, Andrew Neal, and Simon Farrell. ‘Departures from optimality whenpursuingmultipleapproachoravoidancegoals’(2016)101(7)JournalofApplied Psychology, 1056. Eckel Carsten, Leonardo Iacovone, Beata Javorcik, and Peter Neary. ‘Multi-product firms at home and away: Cost-versus quality-based competence’ (2015) 95(2)Journal of International Economics, 216,232. MaryamAlmasifard1andSasanTorabzadehKhorasani,‘RelationshipBetweenDomestic Production in Agricultural and Industrial Sectors and Purchasing Power by Controlling for International Trade Variables (Iran) ‘ (2017) 7(4)International Journal of Economics and Financial, 244, 253. Rabah Amiry , Philip Ericksonz and Jim Jin, ‘On the microeconomic foundations of linear demand for differentiated products’ (2017) (169)Journal of Economic Theory, 641,665. Shirai Kenji, and Yoshinori Amano. ‘CHARACTERISTIC SIMILARITY OF PRODUCTION KEY ELEMENTS GREATLY AFFECTING PROFIT OF A PRODUCTIVE BUSINESS’ (2018) 14(5)INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1929,1946. Simshauser Paul, and Jude Ariyaratnam. ‘What is normal profit for power generation?’ (2014) 6(2)Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 152,178.
9ECO 101 Thomas M. Fullerton, Ileana M. Resendez and Adam G. Walke, ‘Upward sloping demand for a normal good? Residential electricity in Arkansas’ (2015) 5(4)International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 1065,1072.